Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom.

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of a second-generation prototype magnetic guidance system in complex vessel phantoms versus conventional navigation in simulated interventional radiology procedures and to analyze procedure and fluoroscopy times. MATERIALS AND METHODS The magnetic guidance system consists of two focused-field permanent magnets on each side of the body that create a 0.1-T navigation field and is integrated with a modified C-arm single-planar digital angiography system. Forty-nine navigations in a glass phantom and 80 navigations in a three-dimensional liver phantom were performed with a magnetically tipped floppy 0.014-inch guide wire and a conventional 0.014-inch microcatheter system. Rates of success and fluoroscopy and procedure times were quantified for both techniques. For the liver phantom experiment, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. For the glass phantom experiment, the Wilcoxon matched pair test was used with the Hodges-Lehmann estimator. RESULTS In the glass phantom experiments, 42 of 49 turns were successfully performed with both methods. Procedure time to reach a target did not differ significantly between methods, while fluoroscopy time was significantly different when compared with that of the magnetic guidance system (P <.01). Navigation in the liver phantom was successful in 80 of 80 turns with the magnetic guidance system and in 76 of 80 turns with conventional navigation. With the support of the magnetic guidance system, procedure time and fluoroscopy time were significantly different from those with conventional navigation (P <.001). CONCLUSION The magnetic guidance system allows the precise navigation of a magnetic guide wire in complex vessel phantoms with significantly shorter fluoroscopy and procedure times.

[1]  L. Cornelius,et al.  Fluoroscopy-induced radiodermatitis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt , 1998, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[2]  Cornelis A Grimbergen,et al.  Evaluation of vascular and interventional procedures with time-action analysis: a pilot study. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[3]  Kevin Cleary Final Report of the Technical Requirements for Image-Guided Spine Procedures Workshop , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[4]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Novel, Magnetically Guided Catheter for Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  T. Lund,et al.  A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[6]  T. Shope,et al.  Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  B J McNeil,et al.  Advances in biomedical imaging. , 2001, JAMA.

[8]  G. Gillies,et al.  Measurement of the force required to move a neurosurgical probe through in vivo human brain tissue , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  James H. Anderson Image-Guided Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Interventions , 1999 .

[10]  F. Veith,et al.  Endovascular Technology and Its Impact on the Relationships among Vascular Surgeons, Interventional Radiologists, and Other Specialists , 1996, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Emerging therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: opportunities for radiologists. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[12]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Final report of the technical requirements for image-guided spine procedures Workshop, April 17-20, 1999, Ellicott City, Maryland, USA. , 2000 .

[13]  M. Mack,et al.  Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  A. Jacob,et al.  A whole-body registration-free navigation system for image-guided surgery and interventional radiology. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Ramin Shahidi,et al.  Clinical applications of three-dimensional rendering of medical data sets , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  M. Mack,et al.  Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: volumetric and morphologic CT criteria for assessment of prognosis and therapeutic success-results from a liver transplantation center. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  Bruce D Lindsay,et al.  Magnetic catheter manipulation , 2003, Coronary artery disease.

[18]  S. Abbara,et al.  Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. , 2000, Radiology.

[19]  F. Mettler,et al.  Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  E L Siegel,et al.  Severe skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy: case report and review of the literature. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  M A Howard,et al.  Experimental study of the magnetic stereotaxis system for catheter manipulation within the brain. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.