"IT Isn't Different After All": Implications of Normalized Systems for the Industrialization of Software Development
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kris Ven,et al. Towards evolvable software architectures based on systems theoretic stability , 2012, Softw. Pract. Exp..
[2] Meir M. Lehman,et al. Rules and Tools for Software Evolution Planning and Management , 2001, Ann. Softw. Eng..
[3] Dieter Van Nuffel,et al. Towards designing modular and evolvable business processes , 2011 .
[4] W. Edwards Deming,et al. Out of the Crisis , 1982 .
[5] Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al. Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior , 2008, Inf. Syst..
[6] M.M. Lehman,et al. Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[7] Jack Joseph,et al. Oracle Fusion Middleware , 1997 .
[8] Jan Verelst,et al. Normalized systems: re-creating information technology based on laws for software evolvability , 2009 .
[9] Philip Huysmans,et al. On the feasibility of normalized enterprises : applying normalized systems theory to the high-level design of entreprises , 2011 .
[10] August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al. ARIS - Business Process Modeling , 1998 .
[11] Francisco Curbera,et al. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 , 2007 .
[12] Kris Ven,et al. The transformation of requirements into software primitives: Studying evolvability based on systems theoretic stability , 2011, Sci. Comput. Program..
[13] John A. Zachman,et al. A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..
[14] Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Process mining , 2012, CACM.
[15] Jan Mendling,et al. Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects , 2008, BPM.
[16] Remco M. Dijkman,et al. On the usefulness of subprocesses in business process models , 2010 .