Quantifying Neurodegenerative Progression With DeepSymNet, an End-to-End Data-Driven Approach

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide and is one of the leading sources of morbidity and mortality in the aging population. There is a long preclinical period followed by mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Clinical diagnosis and the rate of decline is variable. Progression monitoring remains a challenge in AD, and it is imperative to create better tools to quantify this progression. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used for patient assessment. However, current approaches for analysis require strong a priori assumptions about regions of interest used and complex preprocessing pipelines including computationally expensive non-linear registrations and iterative surface deformations. These preprocessing steps are composed of many stacked processing layers. Any error or bias in an upstream layer will be propagated throughout the pipeline. Failures or biases in the non-linear subject registration and the subjective choice of atlases of specific regions are common in medical neuroimaging analysis and may hinder the translation of many approaches to the clinical practice. Here we propose a data-driven method based on an extension of a deep learning architecture, DeepSymNet, that identifies longitudinal changes without relying on prior brain regions of interest, an atlas, or non-linear registration steps. Our approach is trained end-to-end and learns how a patient's brain structure dynamically changes between two-time points directly from the raw voxels. We compare our approach with Freesurfer longitudinal pipelines and voxel-based methods using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Our model can identify AD progression with comparable results to existing Freesurfer longitudinal pipelines without the need of predefined regions of interest, non-rigid registration algorithms, or iterative surface deformation at a fraction of the processing time. When compared to other voxel-based methods which share some of the same benefits, our model showed a statistically significant performance improvement. Additionally, we show that our model can differentiate between healthy subjects and patients with MCI. The model's decision was investigated using the epsilon layer-wise propagation algorithm. We found that the predictions were driven by the pallidum, putamen, and the superior temporal gyrus. Our novel longitudinal based, deep learning approach has the potential to diagnose patients earlier and enable new computational tools to monitor neurodegeneration in clinical practice.

[1]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Andrew J. Saykin,et al.  Longitudinal measurement and hierarchical classification framework for the prediction of Alzheimer’s disease , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou,et al.  A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies Which Measure Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers , 2017, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[4]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt,et al.  Detection of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Using Longitudinal Brain MRI , 2017, Frontiers Neuroinformatics.

[6]  Ricardo Nitrini,et al.  NeuroImage: Clinical , 2022 .

[7]  A. Convit,et al.  Atrophy of the medial occipitotemporal, inferior, and middle temporal gyri in non-demented elderly predict decline to Alzheimer’s disease☆ , 2000, Neurobiology of Aging.

[8]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Functional Activities Questionnaire Items that Best Discriminate and Predict Progression from Clinically Normal to Mild Cognitive Impairment. , 2015, Current Alzheimer research.

[9]  Aaron Klein,et al.  Efficient and Robust Automated Machine Learning , 2015, NIPS.

[10]  J. Weuve,et al.  2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures , 2016 .

[11]  N. Makris,et al.  MRI-Based Topographic Parcellation of Human Neocortex: An Anatomically Specified Method with Estimate of Reliability , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer's disease and its prodromal stages , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  Robert I. Reid,et al.  White-matter integrity on DTI and the pathologic staging of Alzheimer's disease , 2017, Neurobiology of Aging.

[14]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imaging , 2022 .

[15]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: A robust approach , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Zein Al-Atrache,et al.  CHLAMYDIA PNEUMONIAE-INFECTED ASTROCYTES ALTER THEIR EXPRESSION OF ADAM10, BACE1, AND PRESENILIN-1 PROTEASES , 2016, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[17]  M. Jorge Cardoso,et al.  Training recurrent neural networks robust to incomplete data: Application to Alzheimer’s disease progression modeling , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Chunxiang Jiang,et al.  Prediction and classification of Alzheimer disease based on quantification of MRI deformation , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  A unified view of gradient-based attribution methods for Deep Neural Networks , 2017, NIPS 2017.

[20]  Irene Y. H. Gu,et al.  An efficient 3D deep convolutional network for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using MR images , 2018, 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018).

[21]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Disease progression timeline estimation for Alzheimer's disease using discriminative event based modeling , 2018, NeuroImage.

[22]  Arko Barman,et al.  Determining Ischemic Stroke From CT-Angiography Imaging Using Symmetry-Sensitive Convolutional Networks , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019).

[23]  Reinhold Schmidt,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of resting state fMRI measures to classify individual patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2018, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jennifer L. Whitwell,et al.  Updated TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s disease staging scheme , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[25]  T. Kurosaki,et al.  Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[26]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[27]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[28]  Jessika Suescun,et al.  Longitudinal Connectomes as a Candidate Progression Marker for Prodromal Parkinson’s Disease , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[29]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Structured Sparse Kernel Learning for Imaging Genetics Based Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis , 2016, MICCAI.

[30]  Vladimir Fonov,et al.  ASSOCIATION OF OLFACTORY PERFORMANCE AND HIPPOCAMPAL VOLUME IN PERSONS AT RISK OF ALZHEIMER'S DEMENTIA , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[31]  Enrico Pellegrini,et al.  Machine learning of neuroimaging for assisted diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review , 2018, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[32]  Kuncheng Li,et al.  Voxel-based assessment of gray and white matter volumes in Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multimodal classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2011, NeuroImage.

[34]  Margarida Silveira,et al.  Longitudinal FDG-PET features for the classification of Alzheimer's disease , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[35]  Andres Hoyos Idrobo,et al.  Assessing and tuning brain decoders: Cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines , 2016, NeuroImage.

[36]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Resting state functional connectivity differences between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Bayesian longitudinal segmentation of hippocampal substructures in brain MRI using subject-specific atlases , 2016, NeuroImage.

[38]  Akshay Pai,et al.  Brain region’s relative proximity as marker for Alzheimer’s disease based on structural MRI , 2014, BMC Medical Imaging.

[39]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[40]  C. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2008 .

[41]  Wei Pan,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis Is More Powerful than Cross-Sectional Analysis in Detecting Genetic Association with Neuroimaging Phenotypes , 2014, PloS one.

[42]  Andrea C. Bozoki,et al.  Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Dementia Using Clinical, MRI, and Plasma Biomarkers via Probabilistic Pattern Classification , 2016, PloS one.

[43]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Predicting Future Clinical Changes of MCI Patients Using Longitudinal and Multimodal Biomarkers , 2012, PloS one.

[44]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[45]  Samuel Kadoury,et al.  Classification of Alzheimer's and MCI Patients from Semantically Parcelled PET Images: A Comparison between AV45 and FDG-PET , 2018, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[46]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies: Longitudinal MRI Data in Nondemented and Demented Older Adults , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[48]  Roy W Jones,et al.  On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum , 2017, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

[49]  D. Selkoe Alzheimer's disease. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[50]  J. Morris,et al.  Recent publications from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Reviewing progress toward improved AD clinical trials , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[51]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Reproducible evaluation of classification methods in Alzheimer's disease: Framework and application to MRI and PET data , 2018, NeuroImage.

[52]  Rui Li,et al.  Multi-modal discriminative dictionary learning for Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[53]  Pietro Liò,et al.  A parameter-efficient deep learning approach to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease , 2018, NeuroImage.

[54]  M. Mallar Chakravarty,et al.  Modeling and prediction of clinical symptom trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease using longitudinal data , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  J. Brioni,et al.  and Alzheimer's disease , 2010 .

[56]  Alexander Binder,et al.  On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation , 2015, PloS one.

[57]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-region analysis of longitudinal FDG-PET for the classification of Alzheimer's disease , 2012, NeuroImage.

[58]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Functional Connectivity Alterations of the Temporal Lobe and Hippocampus in Semantic Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease , 2018, bioRxiv.

[59]  Young Chul Youn,et al.  11C-PIB PET imaging reveals that amyloid deposition in cases with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease in the absence of known mutations retains higher levels of PIB in the basal ganglia , 2017, Clinical interventions in aging.