The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30

[1]  N. K. Aaronson,et al.  Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  M. Power,et al.  The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. , 2006, European journal of public health.

[3]  P. Crane.  Commentary on comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  P. Fayers,et al.  Response to Commentary on Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[5]  Brian E. Clauser,et al.  Using Statistical Procedures to Identify Differentially Functioning Test Items , 2005 .

[6]  Young Ik Cho,et al.  The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles , 2005 .

[7]  Y. Cheung,et al.  The equivalence and difference between the English and Chinese versions of two major, cancer‐specific, health‐related quality‐of‐life questionnaires , 2004, Cancer.

[8]  J. Bjorner,et al.  The Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was psychometrically equivalent in nine languages. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  B. Carleton,et al.  The Dimensionality and Gender Differential Item Functioning of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) , 2004 .

[10]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Response Styles in Rating Scales , 2004 .

[11]  P. Fayers,et al.  Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  L. Prieto,et al.  A Rasch model analysis to test the cross‐cultural validity of the EuroQoL‐5D in the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes Study , 2003, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[13]  B. Zumbo,et al.  Differential Item Functioning Results May Change Depending On How An Item Is Scored: An Illustration With The Center For Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale , 2003 .

[14]  S. Buka,et al.  Race/ethnicity and depressive symptoms: a cross-cultural/ethnic comparison among university students in East Asia, North and South America. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Patricia S. Jones,et al.  Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. , 2002, Research in nursing & health.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Race/ethnicity and depressive symptoms in community-dwelling young adults: a differential item functioning analysis , 2002, Psychiatry Research.

[17]  P. Areán,et al.  Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the Beck Depression Inventory. , 2001, Journal of clinical psychology.

[18]  S. Cole,et al.  Test of item-response bias in the CES-D scale. experience from the New Haven EPESE study. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  M Bullinger,et al.  The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of Quality of Life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[20]  J. Ware,et al.  Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  D. Osoba,et al.  Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  J B Bjorner,et al.  Test for item bias in a quality of life questionnaire. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  D. Osoba,et al.  Letters to the editor: Assessing quality of life in clinical trials , 1993 .

[25]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  H. Kimmel,et al.  Identification of unique cultural response patterns by means of item response theory. , 1992 .

[27]  Theo M.M. Verhallen,et al.  Response styles in rating scales : Evidence of method bias in data from 6 EU countries , 2004 .

[28]  M. Orlando,et al.  Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD checklist: detection and evaluation of impact. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[29]  Mark J. Gierl,et al.  Gender Differential Item Functioning in Mathematics and Science: Prevalence and Policy Implications , 1999 .

[30]  B. Spilker,et al.  Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials , 1996 .

[31]  Andrew Bottomley,et al.  EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual , 1995 .

[32]  S. Kaasa,et al.  The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: an update. , 1995 .

[33]  H. Wainer,et al.  Differential item functioning , 1994 .