A new, hand-held keratometer: comparison of theNidek KM-500 auto keratometer with the B&L keratometer and the topcon RK-3000A keratometer

Abstract The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch & Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch & Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.

[1]  A. Lam.  A hand-held keratometer. , 1995 .

[2]  M A Bullimore,et al.  Use of statistics for comparing two measurement methods. , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  A. R. Hill,et al.  Estimating the reliability of clinical tests , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[5]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test , 1991, Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  M J Moseley,et al.  Analysis of method‐comparison data , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.