Information Revolutions and the Overthrow of Autocratic Regimes

This paper presents a model of information quality and political regime change. If enough citizens act against a regime, it is overthrown. Citizens are imperfectly informed about how hard this will be and the regime can, at a cost, engage in propaganda so that at face-value it seems hard. The citizens are rational and evaluate their information knowing the regime's incentives. The model makes three predictions. First, even rational citizens may not correctly infer the amount of manipulation. Second, as the intrinsic quality of information available becomes sufficiently high, the regime is more likely to survive. Third, the regime benefitsfrom ambiguity about the amount of manipulation, and consequently, as it becomes cheaper to manipulate, the regime is also more likely to survive. Key results of the benchmark static model extend to a simple dynamic setting where there are waves of unrest.

[1]  Amil Dasgupta,et al.  Coordination and delay in global games , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[2]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China , 1980 .

[3]  S. Morris,et al.  Rethinking Multiple Equilibria in Macroeconomic Modeling , 2000, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[4]  R. Cooper,et al.  Coordination Games: Technological Complementarities , 1999 .

[5]  M. Keith Chen,et al.  One-Way Essential Complements , 2006 .

[6]  C. Chamley Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning , 2003 .

[7]  S. Morris,et al.  Unique Equilibrium in a Model of Self-Fulfilling Currency Attacks" American Economic Review , 1996 .

[8]  Michael S. Chase,et al.  You've Got Dissent!: Chinese Dissident Use of the Internet and Beijing's Counter-Strategies , 2002 .

[9]  R. Petersen,et al.  Decision Calculus of Protesters and Regimes: Eastern Europe 1989 , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  Daniel C. Lynch After the Propaganda State: Media, Politics, and ‘Thought Work’ in Reformed China , 1999 .

[11]  Timothy Besley,et al.  Handcuffs for the grabbing hand: the role of the media in political accountability , 2001 .

[12]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[13]  S. Morris,et al.  Global Games: Theory and Applications , 2001 .

[14]  M. Hodgson,et al.  The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization , 1976 .

[15]  J. Choi,et al.  Net Neutrality and Investment Incentives , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  A. Pavan,et al.  Signaling in a Global Game: Coordination and Policy Traps , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  S. Lohmann The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91 , 1994, World Politics.

[18]  C. Friedrich,et al.  Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy , 1956 .

[19]  N. Economides The Economics of the Internet , 2007 .

[20]  T. Haughton :National Cleansing: Retribution against Nazi Collaborators in Postwar Czechoslovakia , 2007 .

[21]  Christian Hellwig,et al.  Public Information, Private Information, and the Multiplicity of Equilibria in Coordination Games , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  Cracking the Conundrum , 2007 .

[23]  Sylvain Chassang,et al.  Conflict and Deterrence under Strategic Risk * , 2010 .

[24]  J. Choi Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[26]  Julian Wright,et al.  One-Sided Logic in Two-Sided Markets , 2003 .

[27]  H. Carlsson,et al.  Global Games and Equilibrium Selection , 1993 .

[28]  S. Morris,et al.  Coordination Risk and the Price of Debt , 2002 .

[29]  Shanthi Kalathil,et al.  Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule , 2003, First Monday.

[30]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[31]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[32]  S. Guriev,et al.  Media Freedom, Bureaucratic Incentives and the Resource Curse , 2006 .

[33]  Lawrence C. Soley,et al.  Clandestine Radio Broadcasting: A Study of Revolutionary and Counterrevolutionary Electronic Communication , 1986 .

[34]  Shanthi Kalathil,et al.  Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule , 2003 .

[35]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[36]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Nonbanks in the Payments System: Vertical Integration Issues , 2007 .

[37]  Christiaan Hogendorn,et al.  Broadband Internet: net neutrality versus open access , 2006 .

[38]  T. Kuran,et al.  Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989 , 1991, World Politics.

[39]  Julian Jackson France: The Dark Years, 1940-1944 , 2001 .

[40]  Scott J. Savage,et al.  The Effects of Competition on the Price for Cable Modem Internet Access , 2007 .

[41]  Austan Goolsbee,et al.  The Value of Broadband and the Deadweight Loss of Taxing New Technology , 2006 .

[42]  Alastair Smith,et al.  So You Say You Want a Revolution , 1999 .

[43]  C. Edmond Information Manipulation, Coordination and Regime Change , 2007 .

[44]  M. John,et al.  A Two-Sided Market Analysis of Provider Investment Incentives with an Application to the Net-Neutrality Issue , 2009 .

[45]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  An Economic Analysis of the Determination of Interchange Fees in Payment Card Systems , 2003 .

[46]  D. Murphey What Went Wrong? the Clash between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East , 2003 .

[47]  E. Voegelin The Origins of Totalitarianism , 2020, On Violence.

[48]  D. Pryce-Jones Nazi Propaganda , 1974 .