Using real options theory to a country’s environmental policy: considering the economic size and growth

The aim of this paper is to consider how the economic size and growth of a country affect its environmental policy under uncertainty in a real options framework. In contrast to the prior literature, this work explicitly takes into account the link between the development of an economy and the pollution state of the environment. Policy implementation is found to be determined by the levels of the economic size and the disutility of the pollution. We illustrate how to apply our method to the implementation of an environmental policy in an actual situation and show with numerical calculations that the optimal threshold is sensitive only to the subjective time preference, while the expected implementation time is affected by other parameters.

[1]  Konstadinos Mattas,et al.  Using Real Options Theory to Irrigation Dam Investment Analysis: An Application of Binomial Option Pricing Model , 2007 .

[2]  Margaret C. Insley On the Option to Invest in Pollution Control Under a Regime of Tradable Emissions Allowances , 2003 .

[3]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[4]  Jinhuan Zhao Irreversible Abatement Investment Under Cost Uncertainties: Tradable Emission Permits and Emissions Charges , 2001 .

[5]  R. Pindyck Uncertainty in Environmental Economics , 2006, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[6]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Optimal timing problems in environmental economics , 2002 .

[7]  H. Janzen Carbon cycling in earth systems—a soil science perspective , 2004 .

[8]  Political Measures for Strategic Environmental Policy with External Effects , 2006 .

[9]  F. Schmidt‐bleek,et al.  The Factor 10/MIPS-Concept: Bridging Ecological, Economic, and Social Dimensions with Sustainability Indicators , 1999 .

[10]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development , 1996 .

[11]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[12]  Pollution thresholds under uncertainty , 2006, Environment and Development Economics.

[13]  F. Wirl Energy Prices and Carbon Taxes under Uncertainty about Global Warming , 2007 .

[14]  Motoh Tsujimura,et al.  Induced effects and technological innovation with strategic environmental policy , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso,et al.  Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in the European Union , 2001 .

[16]  T. Selden,et al.  Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? , 1994 .

[17]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Irreversibilities and the Timing of Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[18]  J. C. van den Bergh,et al.  Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves , 1998 .

[19]  D. Stern,et al.  Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: A Critique of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 1994 .

[20]  Ruediger Kuehr,et al.  Strategic sustainable development — selection, design and synergies of applied tools , 2002 .

[21]  Théophile T. Azomahou,et al.  Economic Development and Co2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach , 2006 .

[22]  Murat Işık Incentives for Technology Adoption Under Environmental Policy Uncertainty: Implications for Green Payment Programs , 2004 .

[23]  Marc Chesney,et al.  Optimal Timing to Adopt an Environmental Policy in a Strategic Framework , 2003 .