Data-driven decision making based on evidential reasoning approach and machine learning algorithms

Abstract Large volumes of data have been accumulated in identical or very similar contexts of decision making. To generate accurate and explanatory decision recommendations by using these data, this paper proposes a data-driven multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method based on machine learning (ML) algorithms and the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. In the method, based on the assessments of all historical alternatives, a comparison framework is designed to determine the most appropriate ML algorithm with the highest predictive accuracy. An optimization model is then constructed to connect the appropriate ML algorithm with the ER approach. Through the optimization model, the difference between overall assessments derived from the ER approach and the predicted results derived from the appropriate ML algorithm is minimized to learn criterion weights. The learned criterion weights are used to generate accurate and explanatory decisions. Such a combination takes advantage of high predictability of ML algorithms and favorable interpretability of the ER approach simultaneously. To demonstrate the validity and applicability of the proposed method, it is used to aid the diagnosis of thyroid nodules for a tertiary hospital located in Hefei, Anhui, China. Its merits are further highlighted by its comparison with two traditional ER approaches and the appropriate ML algorithm.

[1]  Ali P. Yunus,et al.  Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  R. Barzilay,et al.  High-Risk Breast Lesions: A Machine Learning Model to Predict Pathologic Upgrade and Reduce Unnecessary Surgical Excision. , 2017, Radiology.

[3]  Robert E. Schapire,et al.  The strength of weak learnability , 1990, Mach. Learn..

[4]  Marko Bohanec,et al.  Explaining machine learning models in sales predictions , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[6]  Saeed Behzadipour,et al.  A modular extreme learning machine with linguistic interpreter and accelerated chaotic distributor for evaluating the safety of robot maneuvers in laparoscopic surgery , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[7]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[9]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ömer Faruk Arar,et al.  A feature dependent Naive Bayes approach and its application to the software defect prediction problem , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Wonho Lee,et al.  A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma. , 2009, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[13]  Chi Xie,et al.  Forecasting SMEs' credit risk in supply chain finance with an enhanced hybrid ensemble machine learning approach , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[14]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Mohamed Elhoseny,et al.  Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Handling imprecise evaluations in multiple criteria decision aiding and robust ordinal regression by n-point intervals , 2017, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[17]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[19]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[20]  Zhong-Zhong Jiang,et al.  A fuzzy matching model with Hurwicz criteria for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges in E-brokerage , 2014, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[21]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Fuyuan Xiao CEQD: A Complex Mass Function to Predict Interference Effects , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[23]  M. Castellano,et al.  The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules. , 2006, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[24]  Ali P. Yunus,et al.  Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan , 2019, Landslides.

[25]  Alex Smola,et al.  Kernel methods in machine learning , 2007, math/0701907.

[26]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Mapping the susceptibility to landslides based on the deep belief network: a case study in Sichuan Province, China , 2020, Natural Hazards.

[27]  Fei Wang,et al.  Efficient tree classifiers for large scale datasets , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[28]  Jie Dou,et al.  Evaluating GIS-Based Multiple Statistical Models and Data Mining for Earthquake and Rainfall-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Using the LiDAR DEM , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Dorit S. Hochbaum,et al.  A comparative study of the leading machine learning techniques and two new optimization algorithms , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence , 2019, Science Robotics.

[31]  Ali P. Yunus,et al.  Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance , 2020 .

[32]  J. R. Quinlan Induction of decision trees , 2004, Machine Learning.

[33]  Cemil Kuzey,et al.  A comparative analysis of machine learning systems for measuring the impact of knowledge management practices , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Eric J Topol,et al.  High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[35]  Pavel V. Sevastjanov,et al.  A framework for rule-base evidential reasoning in the interval setting applied to diagnosing type 2 diabetes , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  E. Horvath,et al.  Prospective validation of the ultrasound based TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System) classification: results in surgically resected thyroid nodules , 2017, European Radiology.

[37]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[38]  Mark J. Stefik Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach: R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell and T.M. Mitchell, (Tioga, Palo Alto, CA); 572 pages, $39.50 , 1985 .

[39]  Jay J. Shen,et al.  Trends and associated factors of use of opioid, heroin, and cannabis among patients for emergency department visits in Nevada: 2009–2017 , 2019, Medicine.

[40]  Terry S Desser,et al.  Common and Uncommon Sonographic Features of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[41]  Ricardo Rossi,et al.  An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. , 2009, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[42]  Andreas Kleine,et al.  Decisions with uncertain alternatives , 1999 .

[43]  Peng Wang,et al.  Long short-term memory for machine remaining life prediction , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[44]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[45]  Ali P. Yunus,et al.  Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Support-vector networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[47]  H. Pourghasemi,et al.  An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[48]  Paulo S. C. Alencar,et al.  The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: A systematic review , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[49]  Chao Fu,et al.  Data-driven multiple criteria decision making for diagnosis of thyroid cancer , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[50]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Explainable artificial intelligence for breast cancer: A visual case-based reasoning approach , 2019, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[51]  Zarita Zainuddin,et al.  Reliable multiclass cancer classification of microarray gene expression profiles using an improved wavelet neural network , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[53]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  B. Pham,et al.  Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[55]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[56]  D. Cox The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences , 1958 .

[57]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Component-based machine learning for performance prediction in building design , 2018, Applied Energy.

[58]  Jeong Hyun Lee,et al.  Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. , 2008, Radiology.

[59]  Julian Hagenauer,et al.  A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for modeling travel mode choice , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[60]  W. Ding,et al.  Clinical diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and TI-RADS classification for benign and malignant thyroid tumors , 2019, Medicine.

[61]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. , 2005, Ultrasound quarterly.

[62]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[63]  Hongwei Zhu,et al.  Automated brain tissue segmentation and MS lesion detection using fuzzy and evidential reasoning , 2003, 10th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 2003. ICECS 2003. Proceedings of the 2003.