Evaluating fitness by integrating the highest payoff within the neighborhood promotes cooperation in social dilemmas

In this paper, we propose a modified fitness evaluation mechanism, which integrates the environmental factors into the focal player’s fitness calculation, to investigate the evolution of cooperative behaviors in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Here, the fitness of a player is computed by combining the individual raw payoff and the highest payoff within the neighborhood, which is regulated by a single parameter termed as trust level η. We show, compared to the traditional version (η=0), that the cooperation level can be highly enhanced for η>0. Meanwhile, we illustrate the dynamical evolution of cooperators on the square lattice, and for different defection parameters b the FC−K curves are utilized to investigate the impact of noise during the strategy updates. Likely, the role of pursuing the highest payoff within the neighborhood also favors the survival of cooperators in the spatial snowdrift game. In addition, the sensibility of knowing the external factors is often not identical for all individuals and we consider the distributed trust level in which η is a distributed parameter, and the results indicate that pursuing the highest payoff in the neighborhood is also inspiring as a consequence of its positive effect on cooperation. The current results are highly instructive for us to further understand the maintenance and emergence of cooperation under the framework of evolutionary game theory.

[1]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[2]  G. Szabó,et al.  Cooperation enhanced by inhomogeneous activity of teaching for evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma games , 2006, q-bio/0610001.

[3]  M. Perc,et al.  Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  G. Szabó,et al.  Phase diagrams for an evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on two-dimensional lattices. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Long Wang,et al.  Partner switching stabilizes cooperation in coevolutionary prisoner's dilemma. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  M. Perc,et al.  Coevolution of teaching activity promotes cooperation , 2008, 0803.4091.

[7]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Aya Hagishima,et al.  What controls network reciprocity in the Prisoner's Dilemma game? , 2010, Biosyst..

[9]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Aspiring to the Fittest and Promotion of Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Coveting thy neighbors fitness as a means to resolve social dilemmas , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[13]  Xiang Li,et al.  Roles of mixing patterns in cooperation on a scale-free networked game. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[15]  Aya Hagishima,et al.  Spatially correlated heterogeneous aspirations to enhance network reciprocity , 2012 .

[16]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Emergence of social cohesion in a model society of greedy, mobile individuals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  György Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma games with voluntary participation. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  G. Szabó,et al.  Cooperation in the noisy case: Prisoner's dilemma game on two types of regular random graphs. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Aya Hagishima,et al.  An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment , 2011, Biosyst..

[20]  J. Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Robustness of cooperation in the evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on complex networks , 2007, q-bio/0703019.

[21]  J. J. Arenzon,et al.  Random mobility and spatial structure often enhance cooperation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Zhaojin Xu,et al.  Bounded rationality leads to equilibrium of public goods games. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  P. Holme,et al.  Effects of strategy-migration direction and noise in the evolutionary spatial prisoner's dilemma. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[25]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[26]  A. Colman Game Theory and its Applications: In the Social and Biological Sciences , 1995 .

[27]  Ramón Alonso-Sanz,et al.  MEMORY BOOSTS COOPERATION , 2006 .

[28]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice , 1997, cond-mat/9710096.

[29]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[30]  Wenxu Wang,et al.  Memory-based snowdrift game on networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Xianbin Cao,et al.  Integrating neighborhoods in the evaluation of fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2010, ArXiv.

[32]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[33]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Selfishness, fraternity, and other-regarding preference in spatial evolutionary games , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Chengyi Xia,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games , 2011 .

[35]  Mao-Bin Hu,et al.  Asymmetric cost in snowdrift game on scale-free networks , 2009 .

[36]  J. J. Arenzon,et al.  Does mobility decrease cooperation? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[38]  Y Moreno,et al.  Effects of mobility in a population of prisoner's dilemma players. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  K. Kaski,et al.  Spatial snowdrift game with myopic agents , 2005 .

[40]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[41]  Chengyi Xia,et al.  Enhancement of cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game on weighted lattices , 2011 .

[42]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[43]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.