An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum

However, it has become increasingly clear over the past twenty years that the contents of standardised tests and examinations are not a random sample from the domain of interests. In particular, these timed written assessments can assess only limited forms of competence, and teachers are quite able to predict which aspects of competence will be assessed. Especially in ‘high-stakes’ assessments, therefore, there is an incentive for teachers and students to concentrate on only those aspects of competence that are likely to be assessed. Put crudely, we start out with the intention of making the important measurable, and end up making the measurable important. The effect of this has been to weaken the correlation between standardised test scores and the wider domains for which they are claimed to be an adequate proxy.

[1]  V. Klenowski,et al.  Student Self‐evaluation Processes in Student‐centred Teaching and Learning Contexts of Australia and England , 1995 .

[2]  W. H. Angoff Criterion-Referencing, Norm-Referencing, and the SAT. , 1974 .

[3]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  National Curriculum Assessments and Programmes of Study: validity and impact , 1996 .

[4]  R. Linn Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[5]  J. Searle The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[6]  Linda Mabry,et al.  Writing to the Rubric: Lingering Effects of Traditional Standardized Testing on Direct Writing Assessment. , 1999 .

[7]  R. Shavelson Performance Assessments: Political Rhetoric and Measurement Reality , 1992 .

[8]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[9]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[12]  F. Allan Hanson,et al.  Testing Testing: Social Consequences of the Examined Life , 1992 .

[13]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  Validity, dependability and reliability in National Curriculum assessment , 1993 .

[14]  Harry Torrance Formative Assessment: some theoretical problems and empirical questions , 1993 .

[15]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  M. Smith Meanings of Test Preparation , 1991 .

[17]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  Standards in examinations: a matter of trust? , 1996 .

[18]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex, and Setting , 1997 .

[19]  Guy Claxton,et al.  What kind of learning does self-assessment drive? Developing a 'nose' for quality , 1995 .

[20]  L. Resnick,et al.  Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform , 1992 .