Managing Technological and Financial Uncertainty: A Decision Science Approach for Strategic Drilling Decisions

This paper presents a framework to improve the quality of investment decisions in petroleum. The model presented enables the decision-maker to explicitly consider two major objectives when evaluating new petroleum opportunities—financial and technological gain. We utilize MultiAttribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to consider simultaneously the technological challenges of petroleum exploration into the capital budgeting process of an exploration and production firm. The MAUT methodology presented in this work demonstrates that in some mature areas the advantages to exploration are restricted further only to financial gain, based upon the present economic potential of the basin. On the other hand, other seemingly less attractive areas, such as deep horizons in deep-water basins, may represent attractive targets for new exploration as a result of the interaction of financial gain and technological advancement. This advantage reflects the technological gain as a key factor for future operations for oil discoveries in areas with big geological potential. The model presented in this work enables the decision-maker to consider explicitly the risk and rewards associated with both financial and technological payoffs, the decision-maker's tolerance for those types of risks, and the relative importance of each of those objectives in the context of ongoing petroleum exploration decisions.

[1]  S. L. Smith The Harding Field: A Low Development Cost per Barrel Concept Becomes a Reality , 1995 .

[2]  Donald L. Keefer,et al.  A Multiobjective Decision Analysis: Budget Planning for Product Engineering , 1978 .

[3]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Risk Propensity and Firm Performance: A Study of the Petroleum Exploration Industry , 1996 .

[4]  John M. Cozzolino,et al.  Controlling Risk in Capital Budgeting: A Practical Use of Utility Theory for Measurement and Control of Petroleum Exploration Risk , 1979 .

[5]  R.J.B. Vargas,et al.  Campos Basin: An evaluation about 20 years of operations , 1997 .

[6]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[7]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[8]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Decision Analysis of Exploration Opportunities in the Onshore US at Phillips Petroleum Company , 1995 .

[9]  C. Kirkwood A Case History of Nuclear Power Plant Site Selection , 1982 .

[10]  M. R. Walls Integrating Business Strategy and Capital Allocation: an Application of Multi-Objective Decision Making , 1995 .

[11]  J. G. Higgins Planning for risk and uncertainty in oil exploration , 1993 .

[12]  M. R. Walls Corporate risk tolerance and capital allocation: a practical approach to implementing an exploration risk policy , 1995 .

[13]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Setting Standards for Offshore Oil Discharges: A Regulatory Decision Analysis , 1982, Oper. Res..

[14]  John C. Butler,et al.  Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models , 1997 .

[15]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Technological forecasting and long-range planning , 1969 .

[16]  Jacob W. Ulvila,et al.  Negotiation of International Oil Tanker Standards: An Application of Multiattribute Value Theory , 1980, Oper. Res..

[17]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[18]  Saul B. Suslick,et al.  SERFIT: an algorithm to forecast mineral trends , 1995 .

[19]  OIL PRODUCTION IN THE 21ST CENTURY , 1998 .