Bayesian model of dynamic image stabilization in the visual system

Humans can resolve the fine details of visual stimuli although the image projected on the retina is constantly drifting relative to the photoreceptor array. Here we demonstrate that the brain must take this drift into account when performing high acuity visual tasks. Further, we propose a decoding strategy for interpreting the spikes emitted by the retina, which takes into account the ambiguity caused by retinal noise and the unknown trajectory of the projected image on the retina. A main difficulty, addressed in our proposal, is the exponentially large number of possible stimuli, which renders the ideal Bayesian solution to the problem computationally intractable. In contrast, the strategy that we propose suggests a realistic implementation in the visual cortex. The implementation involves two populations of cells, one that tracks the position of the image and another that represents a stabilized estimate of the image itself. Spikes from the retina are dynamically routed to the two populations and are interpreted in a probabilistic manner. We consider the architecture of neural circuitry that could implement this strategy and its performance under measured statistics of human fixational eye motion. A salient prediction is that in high acuity tasks, fixed features within the visual scene are beneficial because they provide information about the drifting position of the image. Therefore, complete elimination of peripheral features in the visual scene should degrade performance on high acuity tasks involving very small stimuli.

[1]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Gain Modulation A Major Computational Principle of the Central Nervous System , 2000, Neuron.

[2]  A. Pouget,et al.  Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Moshe Gur PII: S0042-6989(96)00182-4 , 1997 .

[4]  Bartlett W. Mel Synaptic integration in an excitable dendritic tree. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Steady discharges of macaque retinal ganglion cells , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Visual jitter: evidence for visual-motion-based compensation of retinal slip due to small eye movements , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Functional Asymmetries in ON and OFF Ganglion Cells of Primate Retina , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Moshe Gur,et al.  Eye position compensation improves estimates of response magnitude and receptive field geometry in alert monkeys. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Fast Population Coding , 2007, Neural Computation.

[11]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  A Neural Computation for Visual Acuity in the Presence of Eye Movements , 2007, PLoS biology.

[12]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Dynamic stabilization of receptive fields of cortical neurons (VI) during fixation of gaze in the macaque , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades Keep the Eyes' Balance During Fixation , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  C. Colby,et al.  Trans-saccadic perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian Inference and Attentional Modulation in the Visual Cortex Correspondence and Requests for Reprints to Rajesh , 2005 .

[18]  I. Donaldson,et al.  The functions of the proprioceptors of the eye muscles. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Deterministic Multiplicative Gain Control with Active Dendrites , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  A multiscale dynamic routing circuit for forming size- and position-invariant object representations , 1995, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  David W. Arathorn,et al.  Map-Seeking Circuits in Visual Cognition: A Computational Mechanism for Biological and Machine Vision , 2002 .

[22]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Gain Modulation from Background Synaptic Input , 2002, Neuron.

[24]  Stephen A. Baccus,et al.  Segregation of object and background motion in the retina , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Kenneth D Miller,et al.  Multiplicative Gain Changes Are Induced by Excitation or Inhibition Alone , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  W. Merigan,et al.  Spatial resolution across the macaque retina , 1990, Vision Research.

[27]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Quality of retinal image stabilization during small natural and artificial body rotations in man , 1979, Vision Research.

[28]  S. Schein Anatomy of macaque fovea and spatial densities of neurons in foveal representation , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Binocular retinal image motion during active head rotation , 1980, Vision Research.

[30]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Power spectra for ocular drift and tremor , 1985, Vision Research.

[32]  D. Sparks,et al.  Corollary discharge provides accurate eye position information to the oculomotor system. , 1983, Science.

[33]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  B. Batlogg,et al.  Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields Created by Multiplication , 2022 .

[35]  David Williams,et al.  The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye , 1999, Nature.

[36]  Martina Poletti,et al.  Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail , 2007, Nature.

[37]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Shifter circuits: a computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.