Lead-like Compounds

Lead-like compounds have lower initial values for structural properties, allowing increases without becoming non-drug-like. The “hits” that serve as starting places for leads come from high-throughput screening, virtual screening, natural ligands, natural products, and the scientific literature. In the “hit-to-lead” phase, it is important to include properties in the workflow and goals for lead selection. In this evaluation process, some effective concepts have been emerging: lead-likeness, template conservation, triage, and fragment-based screening. The use of one or more of these concepts can increase the chances of success in discovering a strong lead-like structural foundation. Structure modifications during optimization are often added onto the lead template, thus retaining much of the original core structure of the lead. An emerging strategy in exploring for novel leads is termed as fragment-based screening. The well-studied lead-like criteria reinforce the principle that success in discovering drug-like clinical candidates is higher when starting with compounds that have structural properties with lower values, which allow the opportunity for structural modifications to enhance activity and selectivity without condemning the series to unacceptable pharmacokinetic performance.

[1]  Christopher W Murray,et al.  Fragment-based lead discovery: leads by design. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[2]  J. Proudfoot Drugs, leads, and drug-likeness: an analysis of some recently launched drugs. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[3]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  H. Jhoti,et al.  The Discovery of Novel Protein Kinase Inhibitors by Using Fragment‐Based High‐Throughput X‐ray Crystallography , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[5]  John Davies,et al.  Design of small molecule libraries for NMR screening and other applications in drug discovery. , 2002, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[6]  H. Jhoti,et al.  Structure-based screening of low-affinity compounds. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[7]  M. Congreve,et al.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[8]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  The Design of Leadlike Combinatorial Libraries. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  Edgar Jacoby,et al.  Library design for fragment based screening. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[10]  G. Rishton Nonleadlikeness and leadlikeness in biochemical screening. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[11]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[12]  Joseph C. Lin Rule of Three: a case of discrimination against certain authors caused by the cataloging rules , 1985 .

[13]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.