A decision model for spatial site selection by criminals: a foundation for law enforcement decision support

Crime analysis uses past crime data to predict future crime locations and times. Typically this analysis relies on hot spot models that show clusters of criminal events based on past locations of these events. It does not consider the decision making processes of criminals as human initiated events susceptible to analysis using spatial choice models. This paper analyzes criminal incidents as spatial choice processes. Spatial choice analysis can be used to discover the distribution of people's behaviors in space and time. Two adjusted spatial choice models that include models of decision making processes are presented. The comparison results show that adjusted spatial choice models provide efficient and accurate predictions of future crime patterns and can be used as the basis for a law enforcement decision support system. This paper also extends spatial choice modeling to include the class of problems where the decision makers' preferences are derived indirectly through incident reports rather than directly through survey instruments.

[1]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[2]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[3]  Shean-Tsong Chiu,et al.  Bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation , 1991 .

[4]  Donald E. Brown,et al.  Mining Preferences from Spatial-Temporal Data , 2001, SDM.

[5]  Kent A. Harries,et al.  Mapping Crime: Principle And Practice , 1999 .

[6]  A. Fotheringham.  Note---Consumer Store Choice and Choice Set Definition , 1988 .

[7]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[8]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[9]  D. Osgood.  Poisson-Based Regression Analysis of Aggregate Crime Rates , 2000 .

[10]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Capturing Geographically Localized Misspecification Error in Retail Store Choice Models , 1995 .

[11]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[12]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  M. Charlton,et al.  Quantitative geography : perspectives on spatial data analysis by , 2001 .

[14]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Incorporating Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Urban Work Travel Mode Choice Modeling , 2000, Transp. Sci..

[15]  Kenneth Train,et al.  THE GOODS/LEISURE TRADEOFF AND DISAGGREGATE WORK TRIP MODE CHOICE MODELS. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1978 .

[16]  E. Mulvey,et al.  Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[18]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[19]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .