Target Difficulty, Priority Assignment of Attentional Resources, Foveal Task Load, and Order of Testing of Foveal Loading on Visual Lobe Shape Characteristics

Effects of the difficulty of a peripheral target, the priority assignment of attentional resources for simultaneous peripheral and foveal tasks, and the foveal task load and order of testing of cognitive foveal loadings on visual lobe shape characteristics were investigated. Analysis showed that lobe shape characteristics were affected by target difficulty but not the low foveal load. For the tasks used here, attentional resources were sufficient for participants to perform both peripheral and foveal tasks concurrently; therefore, priority assignment of attentional resources had no effect on lobe shape. With regard to order of testing of foveal loading, lobe roundness, boundary smoothness, and vertical symmetry improved with a positive practice effect for the groups tested in the high level–low level order. The implication is that providing training or practice to participants on a task with a higher level foveal load could optimize lobe roundness, boundary smoothness, and symmetry. Performance on the foveal task was better with easy peripheral targets than difficult targets and better for the foveal-primary than for the peripheral-primary conditions, presumably because of the larger proportion of attentional resources allocated to the foveal task for these two groups.

[1]  S Plainis,et al.  Raised Visual Detection Thresholds Depend on the Level of Complexity of Cognitive Foveal Loading , 2001, Perception.

[2]  A J Courtney,et al.  Simple measures of visual-lobe size and search performance. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[3]  L. J. Williams.  Visual field tunneling in aviators induced by memory demands. , 1995, The Journal of general psychology.

[4]  Alan H S Chan,et al.  Visual lobe shape and search performance for targets of different difficulty , 2007, Ergonomics.

[5]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[6]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Sensitivity and validity of visual search models for multiple targets , 2002 .

[7]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Validating the random search model for a double-target search task , 2000 .

[8]  L J Williams,et al.  Cognitive Load and the Functional Field of View , 1982, Human factors.

[9]  L J Williams,et al.  Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. , 1988, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search. , 1998, Experimental aging research.

[11]  L. J. Williams.  Foveal Load Affects the Functional Field of View , 1989 .

[12]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  EYE MOVEMENTS AND THE PERCEPTUAL SPAN DURING VISUAL SEARCH , 1987 .

[13]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Enhanced Features of VIsual LObe Measurement System (VILOMS) , 2007, IMECS.

[14]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Visual search and visual lobe size: can training on one affect the other? , 2002 .

[15]  William J Horrey,et al.  Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  Ronald A. Eriuckson.  Relation between Visual Search Time and Peripheral Visual Acuity , 1964 .

[17]  Alan H S Chan,et al.  Quantifying Visual Field Shape for Improving Accuracy of Search Performance Prediction , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  A J Courtney,et al.  Revising and Validating the Random Search Model for Competitive Search , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Alan J. Courtney,et al.  Mapping the Binocular Visual Field for a Target Embedded in a Regular Background , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  A J Courtney,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Foveal Load on a Peripheral Single-Target Detection Task , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  R A ERICKSON.  RELATION BETWEEN VISUAL SEARCH TIME AND PERIPHERAL VISUAL ACUITY. , 1964, Human factors.

[22]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Measurement of visual lobe dimensions with a simultaneous foveal task , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Information Intelligence and Systems (Cat. No.96CH35929).

[23]  L J Williams,et al.  Tunnel Vision Induced by a Foveal Load Manipulation , 1985, Human factors.

[24]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Measurement and quantification of visual lobe shape characteristics , 2006 .

[25]  E M Rantanen,et al.  The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[26]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  Alain Muzet,et al.  Deformation of the Useful Visual Field with State of Vigilance, Task Priority, and Central Task Complexity , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  A J Courtney,et al.  Development of a search task for the measurement of peripheral visual acuity. , 1981, Ergonomics.

[30]  A. Chan,et al.  SHAPE CHARACTERISTICS OF USEFUL FIELD OF VIEW AND VISUAL SEARCH TIME , 2007 .

[31]  N Moray,et al.  Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[32]  A J Courtney,et al.  Eight-Axis Visual-Field Mapping for Targets Embedded in a Homogeneous Competing Background , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[33]  Cathy H. Y. Chiu,et al.  The effects of visual lobe training with easy and difficult targets on changes of visual lobe shape characteristics and visual search performance. , 2009 .

[34]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[35]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Visual lobe shape characteristics of experienced industrial inspectors and inexperienced subjects , 2010 .

[36]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  A J Courtney,et al.  Effects of priority assignment of attentional resources, order of testing, and response sequence on tunnel vision. , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[38]  W. Geisler,et al.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search. , 1995, Psychological review.

[39]  Mitsuo Ikeda,et al.  Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field , 1975 .

[40]  P. Goolkasian,et al.  Peripheral vision location and kinds of complex processing. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  M. Pomplun,et al.  Investigating the visual span in comparative search: the effects of task difficulty and divided attention , 2001, Cognition.

[42]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[43]  Theodore Watson Forbes.  Human Factors in Highway Design, Operation and Safety Problems1 , 1960 .

[44]  D. Plude,et al.  Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[45]  Alan J. Courtney,et al.  Visual Lobe Area for Single Targets on a Competing Homogeneous Background , 1985, Human factors.

[46]  E. C. M. van de Weijgert.  Foveal load and peripheral task performance: tunnel vision or general interference , 1993 .