Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation

Dimensions is a new database that focussed on a different set of problems to other scholarly search systems. Specifically, by the including not only data about publications and their natural associated citation graph, but by also including awarded grant data, patent data and clinical data and altmetric attention data, Dimensions holds a representation of an n-partite graph associated with the heterogeneous research objects. These objects have been treated as heterogeneous, but need to be brought onto the same footing (and homogenised) in order that they should make sense to a user. The links (or edges) in the expanded network of objects is created through extensive use of text mining and machine learning to extract and to normalise data. This article gives an overview of the techniques used to create the Dimensions dataset.

[1]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Dimensions: A Competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Jonathan Adams,et al.  The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact , 2015 .

[3]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Research impact: a narrative review , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[4]  Dimensons Team,et al.  A Guide to the Dimensions Data Approach , 2018 .

[5]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Martin Szomszor,et al.  Dimensions - A Collaborative Approach to Enhancing Research Discovery , 2018 .

[7]  E. Garfield Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[8]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management , 2015 .

[10]  M. Way,et al.  The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[11]  R. Shanmugam Measuring research: what everyone needs to know , 2018, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation.

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report , 2016, Scientometrics.

[13]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[14]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Cascading Citation Expansion , 2018, ArXiv.

[15]  Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al.  Dimensions: re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information , 2018, ArXiv.