Quantitative analysis of gene function in the Drosophila embryo.

The specific functions of gene products frequently depend on the developmental context in which they are expressed. Thus, studies on gene function will benefit from systems that allow for manipulation of gene expression within model systems where the developmental context is well defined. Here we describe a system that allows for genetically controlled overexpression of any gene of interest under normal physiological conditions in the early Drosophila embryo. This regulated expression is achieved through the use of Drosophila lines that express a maternal mRNA for the yeast transcription factor GAL4. Embryos derived from females that express GAL4 maternally activate GAL4-dependent UAS transgenes at uniform levels throughout the embryo during the blastoderm stage of embryogenesis. The expression levels can be quantitatively manipulated through the use of lines that have different levels of maternal GAL4 activity. Specific phenotypes are produced by expression of a number of different developmental regulators with this system, including genes that normally do not function during Drosophila embryogenesis. Analysis of the response to overexpression of runt provides evidence that this pair-rule segmentation gene has a direct role in repressing transcription of the segment-polarity gene engrailed. The maternal GAL4 system will have applications both for the measurement of gene activity in reverse genetic experiments as well as for the identification of genetic factors that have quantitative effects on gene function in vivo.

[1]  J. Gergen,et al.  Regulation of runt transcription by Drosophila segmentation genes , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[2]  P. Rørth.  Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline , 1998, Mechanisms of Development.

[3]  H. Krause,et al.  Control of segmental asymmetry in Drosophila embryos. , 1993, Development.

[4]  U. Banerjee,et al.  Patterning of cells in the Drosophila eye by Lozenge, which shares homologous domains with AML1. , 1996, Genes & development.

[5]  Judith A. Kassis,et al.  Two-tiered regulation of spatially patterned engrailed gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis , 1988, Nature.

[6]  Alfred L. Fisher,et al.  Groucho-dependent and -independent repression activities of Runt domain proteins , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[7]  G. Struhl.  Near-reciprocal phenotypes caused by inactivation or indiscriminate expression of the Drosophila segmentation gene ftz , 1985, Nature.

[8]  G. Boulianne,et al.  Distinct expression patterns detected within individual tissues by the GAL4 enhancer trap technique. , 1996, Genome.

[9]  W. Theurkauf,et al.  Tissue-specific and constitutive alpha-tubulin genes of Drosophila melanogaster code for structurally distinct proteins. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Gergen Jp.  Dosage Compensation in Drosophila: Evidence That daughterless and Sex-lethal Control X Chromosome Activity at the Blastoderm Stage of Embryogenesis. , 1987 .

[11]  D. Ish-Horowicz,et al.  Pattern abnormalities induced by ectopic expression of the Drosophila gene hairy are associated with repression of ftz transcription , 1987, Cell.

[12]  J. Gergen,et al.  Direct activation of Sex-lethal transcription by the Drosophila runt protein. , 1999, Development.

[13]  V. Solovyev,et al.  Expression of Msl-2 causes assembly of dosage compensation regulators on the X chromosomes and female lethality in Drosophila , 1995, Cell.

[14]  A. Brand,et al.  Runt determines cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic CNS. , 1998, Development.

[15]  Ernst Hafen,et al.  The ETS domain protein Pointed-P2 is a target of MAP kinase in the Sevenless signal transduction pathway , 1994, Nature.

[16]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila , 1980, Nature.

[17]  K. Anderson,et al.  decapentaplegic acts as a morphogen to organize dorsal-ventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo , 1992, Cell.

[18]  J. Downing,et al.  AML1, the Target of Multiple Chromosomal Translocations in Human Leukemia, Is Essential for Normal Fetal Liver Hematopoiesis , 1996, Cell.

[19]  A. Brand,et al.  Specificity of bone morphogenetic protein-related factors: cell fate and gene expression changes in Drosophila embryos induced by decapentaplegic but not 60A. , 1994, Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[20]  K. Kaiser,et al.  GAL4 enhancer traps expressed in the embryo, larval brain, imaginal discs, and ovary of drosophila , 1997, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[21]  M. Weir,et al.  Functional dissection of the paired segmentation gene in Drosophila embryos. , 1991, Genes & development.

[22]  J. Valcárcel,et al.  The Drosophila splicing regulator sex-lethal directly inhibits translation of male-specific-lethal 2 mRNA. , 1998, RNA.

[23]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Subdivision of the drosophila mushroom bodies by enhancer-trap expression patterns , 1995, Neuron.

[24]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Translational regulation of nanos by RNA localization , 1994, Nature.

[25]  C. Tsai,et al.  Pair-rule gene runt restricts orthodenticle expression to the presumptive head of the Drosophila embryo. , 1998, Developmental genetics.

[26]  J. Gergen,et al.  Expression and function of the Drosophila gene runt in early stages of neural development. , 1991, Development.

[27]  C. Tsai,et al.  Pair-rule expression of the Drosophila fushi tarazu gene: a nuclear receptor response element mediates the opposing regulatory effects of runt and hairy. , 1995, Development.

[28]  L H Frank,et al.  A group of genes required for maintenance of the amnioserosa tissue in Drosophila. , 1996, Development.

[29]  C. Ingles,et al.  Homeodomain-independent activity of the fushi tarazu polypeptide in Drosophila embryos , 1992, Nature.

[30]  C. Thummel,et al.  Vectors for Drosophila P-element-mediated transformation and tissue culture transfection. , 1988, Gene.

[31]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. , 1993, Development.

[32]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells , 1998, Current Biology.

[33]  Makoto Sato,et al.  Targeted Disruption of Cbfa1 Results in a Complete Lack of Bone Formation owing to Maturational Arrest of Osteoblasts , 1997, Cell.

[34]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Nanos and Pumilio have critical roles in the development and function of Drosophila germline stem cells. , 1998, Development.

[35]  C. Tsai,et al.  Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation. , 1994, Development.

[36]  Gerald M. Rubin,et al.  The activities of two Ets-related transcription factors required for drosophila eye development are modulated by the Ras/MAPK pathway , 1994, Cell.

[37]  Tom Maniatis,et al.  GAL4 activates transcription in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[38]  G. Karsenty,et al.  Osf2/Cbfa1: A Transcriptional Activator of Osteoblast Differentiation , 1997, Cell.

[39]  J. B. Jaynes,et al.  Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo. , 1995, Development.

[40]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Establishment and refinement of segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo: spatial control of engrailed expression by pair-rule genes. , 1987, Genes & development.

[41]  U. Banerjee,et al.  Lozenge is expressed in pluripotent precursor cells and patterns multiple cell types in the Drosophila eye through the control of cell-specific transcription factors. , 1998, Development.

[42]  H. Krause,et al.  Concentration-dependent activities of the even-skipped protein in Drosophila embryos. , 1992, Genes & development.

[43]  A. Michon,et al.  Translational control of oskar generates short OSK, the isoform that induces pole plasma assembly. , 1995, Development.

[44]  E. Wieschaus,et al.  Dosage requirements for runt in the segmentation of Drosophila embryos , 1986, Cell.

[45]  J. Kishi,et al.  Accumulation of collagen III at the cleft points of developing mouse submandibular epithelium. , 1988, Development.

[46]  H. Krause,et al.  A phosphorylation site in the Ftz homeodomain is required for activity , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[47]  U. Banerjee,et al.  Patterning an epidermal field: Drosophila lozenge, a member of the AML-1/Runt family of transcription factors, specifies olfactory sense organ type in a dose-dependent manner. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[48]  M. Levine,et al.  The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. , 1996, Development.

[49]  S. Mundlos,et al.  Cbfa1, a Candidate Gene for Cleidocranial Dysplasia Syndrome, Is Essential for Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Development , 1997, Cell.

[50]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Genetics of nanos localization in Drosophila , 1994, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[51]  G. Struhl,et al.  Cis- acting sequences responsible for anterior localization of bicoid mRNA in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Nature.

[52]  B. S. Baker,et al.  The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control , 1997, Cell.

[53]  J. Gergen,et al.  Coordinate initiation of Drosophila development by regulated polyadenylation of maternal messenger RNAs. , 1994, Science.

[54]  Ruth Lehmann,et al.  Induction of germ cell formation by oskar , 1992, Nature.

[55]  M. Noll,et al.  Network of interactions among pair-rule genes regulating paired expression during primordial segmentation of Drosophila , 1990, Mechanisms of Development.

[56]  P. Macdonald,et al.  Translational regulation of oskar mRNA by Bruno, an ovarian RNA-binding protein, is essential , 1995, Cell.

[57]  M. Marín‐Padilla,et al.  Disruption of the Cbfa2 gene causes necrosis and hemorrhaging in the central nervous system and blocks definitive hematopoiesis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Thomas C. Kaufman,et al.  Developmental distribution of RNA and protein products of the Drosophila α-tubulin gene family , 1989 .

[59]  S. Carroll,et al.  Zygotically active genes that affect the spatial expression of the fushi tarazu segmentation gene during early Drosophila embryogenesis , 1986, Cell.

[60]  J. Gergen,et al.  The Drosophila segmentation gene runt acts as a position-specific numerator element necessary for the uniform expression of the sex-determining gene Sex-lethal. , 1991, Genes & development.

[61]  M. Jacobs-Lorena,et al.  Translational regulation of mRNAs for ribosomal proteins during early Drosophila development. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[62]  W. Engels,et al.  A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1988, Genetics.

[63]  M. Horb,et al.  A Xenopus homologue of aml-1 reveals unexpected patterning mechanisms leading to the formation of embryonic blood. , 1998, Development.

[64]  L. Sánchez,et al.  The segmentation gene runt is needed to activate Sex-lethal, a gene that controls sex determination and dosage compensation in Drosophila. , 1992, Genetical research.

[65]  M. Ohki,et al.  The Runt domain identifies a new family of heteromeric transcriptional regulators. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.