The evolving Gleason grading system.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] U. Ferreira,et al. The value of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy , 2014, International Urology and Nephrology.
[2] R Montironi,et al. Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Contemporary approach. , 2005, Pathologica.
[3] R Y Ball,et al. A study of Gleason score interpretation in different groups of UK pathologists; techniques for improving reproducibility , 2006, Histopathology.
[4] S. Raab. A Contemporary Study Correlating Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score , 2009 .
[5] J. Epstein,et al. Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system , 2010, Nature Reviews Urology.
[6] B. Delahunt,et al. Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point , 2010, Pathology.
[7] Hilla Peretz,et al. Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .
[8] P. Stattin,et al. Gleason inflation 1998–2011: a registry study of 97 168 men , 2015, BJU international.
[9] P. Humphrey,et al. Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate , 2004, Modern Pathology.
[10] S. Piantadosi,et al. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[11] L. Egevad,et al. Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.
[12] Alberto G. Ayala,et al. Prostate pathology , 2004 .
[13] M.,et al. Changes [I] , 2018, The Complete Poems of William Barnes, Vol. 2: Poems in the Modified Form of the Dorset Dialect.
[14] L. Egevad,et al. Modified Gleason grading. An updated review. , 2009, Histology and histopathology.
[15] Jonathan I. Epstein,et al. WHO Classification of of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs , 2016 .
[16] Athanase Billis,et al. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. , 2008, The Journal of urology.
[17] A. Osunkoya. Update on prostate pathology , 2012, Pathology.
[18] Antonio Lopez-Beltran,et al. Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma , 2006, Virchows Archiv.
[19] P. Walsh. The Gleason Grading System: A Complete Guide for Pathologists and Clinicians , 2013 .
[20] L. Egevad,et al. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[21] K. Trpkov,et al. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice , 2009, Histopathology.
[22] B. Sarbay,et al. The association of the cribriform pattern with outcome for prostatic adenocarcinomas. , 2014, Pathology, research and practice.
[23] N. Kinukawa,et al. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer , 2008, The Journal of urology.
[24] J. Epstein,et al. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. , 2008, The Journal of urology.
[25] I. Sesterhenn,et al. World health organization classifications of tumours. pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs , 2005 .
[26] Mahul B Amin,et al. Update on the Gleason Grading System for Prostate Cancer: Results of an International Consensus Conference of Urologic Pathologists , 2006, Advances in anatomic pathology.
[27] Fang-Ming Deng,et al. Gleason Score 3 + 4=7 Prostate Cancer With Minimal Quantity of Gleason Pattern 4 on Needle Biopsy Is Associated With Low-risk Tumor in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[28] J. Epstein,et al. Changes in prostate cancer grading: Including a new patient‐centric grading system , 2016, The Prostate.
[29] Chin-Lee Wu,et al. Impact on the Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer by the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Modified Gleason Grading System , 2012, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[30] Ximing J. Yang,et al. Grading of Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma on Prostate Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Study among Experts in Genitourinary Pathology , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[31] J. Epstein. An update of the Gleason grading system. , 2010, The Journal of urology.
[32] Andrew J. Evans,et al. Interactive digital slides with heat maps: a novel method to improve the reproducibility of Gleason grading , 2011, Virchows Archiv.
[33] S. Moss,et al. A UK‐based investigation of inter‐ and intra‐observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies , 2006, Histopathology.
[34] B. Delahunt,et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[35] Y. Inayama,et al. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens , 2009, BJU international.
[36] L. Egevad,et al. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens , 2006, Virchows Archiv.
[37] P. Humphrey,et al. Tumors of the Prostate Gland, Seminal Vesicles, Penis, and Scrotum , 2011 .
[38] Brett Delahunt,et al. Gleason grading: past, present and future , 2012, Histopathology.
[39] R. Shah,et al. Current perspectives on the Gleason grading of prostate cancer. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[40] L. Egevad,et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[41] Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer,et al. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping : data based on the modified Gleason scoring system , 2013 .