Methodology for Comprehensive Comparison of Energy Harvesting Shock Absorber Systems

In recent years, there has been a lot of work related to Energy Harvesting Shock Absorbers (EHSA). These devices harvest energy from the movement of the vehicle’s shock absorbers caused by road roughness, braking, acceleration and turning. There are different technologies that can be used in these systems, but it is not clear which would be the best option if you want to replace a conventional shock absorber with an EHSA. This article presents a methodology to compare the performance of different EHSA technologies that can replace a shock absorber with a given damping coefficient. The methodology allows to include different analysis options, including different types of driving cycles, computer vehicle models, input signals and road types. The article tests the methodology in selecting the optimal EHSA technology for a particular shock absorber and vehicle, optimizing at the same time energy recovery. In addition, a study of parameters in each type of technology is included to analyze its influence on the final objective. In the example analyzed, the EHSA technology with a rack and pinion system turned out to be the best. The proposed methodology can be extrapolated to other case studies and design objectives.

[1]  Yilun Liu,et al.  Design, Modeling, Lab, and Field Tests of a Mechanical-Motion-Rectifier-Based Energy Harvester Using a Ball-Screw Mechanism , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[2]  Mitsuaki Ishitobi,et al.  Chaotic vibration of a nonlinear full-vehicle model , 2006 .

[3]  Guangming Jin,et al.  Energy Regeneration From Suspension Dynamic Modes and Self-Powered Actuation , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Octavian Curea,et al.  From functional analysis to energy harvesting system design: application to car suspension , 2014 .

[5]  Lei Zuo,et al.  Energy Harvesting, Ride Comfort, and Road Handling of Regenerative Vehicle Suspensions paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the power that is available for harvest- , 2013 .

[6]  Hamid Taghavifar,et al.  A novel approach to energy harvesting from vehicle suspension system: Half-vehicle model , 2017 .

[7]  Ahmad Syuhri,et al.  Damping properties and energy evaluation of a regenerative shock absorber , 2018 .

[8]  Frank Gauterin,et al.  Investigation of the energy recuperation potential of the damper system for a compact class passenger car , 2017 .

[9]  I Nyoman Sutantra,et al.  Modeling, Prototyping and Testing of Regenerative Electromagnetic Shock Absorber , 2014 .

[10]  Mehrdad Moallem,et al.  Regenerative Shock Absorber Using a Two-Leg Motion Conversion Mechanism , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Johannes J. H. Paulides,et al.  Efficiency of a Regenerative Direct-Drive Electromagnetic Active Suspension , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[12]  Peter Múčka,et al.  Simulated Road Profiles According to ISO 8608 in Vibration Analysis , 2017 .

[13]  Luis Guillermo Fuentes Pumarejo,et al.  Evaluation of the methodologies used to generate random pavement profiles based on the power spectral density: An approach based on the International Roughness Index , 2017 .

[14]  Yanping Yuan,et al.  A high-efficiency energy regenerative shock absorber using supercapacitors for renewable energy applications in range extended electric vehicle , 2016 .

[15]  José Luis Olazagoitia,et al.  An Innovative Energy Harvesting Shock Absorber System Using Cable Transmission , 2019, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  Mohamed A. A. Abdelkareem,et al.  Analysis of the prospective vibrational energy harvesting of heavy-duty truck suspensions: A simulation approach , 2019, Energy.

[17]  Gangfeng Tan,et al.  Design, Modeling, and Analysis of a Novel Hydraulic Energy-Regenerative Shock Absorber for Vehicle Suspension , 2017 .

[18]  R. G. Oropeza Los ciclos de manejo, una herramienta útil si es dinámica para evaluar el consumo de combustible y las emisiones contaminantes del auto transporte , 2005 .

[19]  Xuexun Guo,et al.  Energy harvesting sensitivity analysis and assessment of the potential power and full car dynamics for different road modes , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[20]  Kimihiko Nakano,et al.  Combined Type Self-Powered Active Vibration Control of Truck Cabins , 2004 .

[21]  Zhang Yuxin,et al.  Energy conversion mechanism and regenerative potential of vehicle suspensions , 2017 .

[22]  José Luis Olazagoitia,et al.  Methodology for comparing the functional performance of energy harvesting shock absorbers , 2017 .