Factors influencing wood mobilization in streams

[1] Natural pieces of wood provide a variety of ecosystem functions in streams including habitat, organic matter retention, increased hyporheic exchange and transient storage, and enhanced hydraulic and geomorphic heterogeneity. Wood mobilization is a critical process in determining the residence time of wood. We documented the characteristics and locations of 865 natural wood pieces (>0.05 m in diameter for a portion >1 m in length) in nine streams along the north shore of Lake Superior in Minnesota. We determined the locations of the pieces again after an overbank stormflow event to determine the factors that influenced mobilization of stationary wood pieces in natural streams. Seven of 11 potential predictor variables were identified with multiple logistic regression as significant to mobilization: burial, effective depth, ratio of piece length to effective stream width (length ratio), bracing, rootwad presence, downstream force ratio, and draft ratio. The final model (P < 0.001, r2 = 0.39) indicated that wood mobilization under natural conditions is a complex function of both mechanical factors (burial, length ratio, bracing, rootwad presence, draft ratio) and hydraulic factors (effective depth, downstream force ratio). If stable pieces are a goal for stream management then features such as partial burial, low effective depth, high length relative to channel width, bracing against other objects (e.g., stream banks, trees, rocks, or larger wood pieces), and rootwads are desirable. Using the model equation from this study, stewards of natural resources can better manage in-stream wood for the benefit of stream ecosystems.

[1]  A. Elosegi,et al.  Breakdown of wood in the Agüera stream , 2002 .

[2]  Cheryl C Harrelson,et al.  Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique , 1994 .

[3]  K. Gilman.  Stream hydrology: An introduction for ecologists , 1993 .

[4]  G. Fox,et al.  Hyporheic and total transient storage in small, sand‐bed streams , 2008 .

[5]  T. Gomi,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF WOOD IN HEADWATER STREAMS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST 1 , 2005 .

[6]  Hervé Piégay,et al.  Public Perception as a Barrier to Introducing Wood in Rivers for Restoration Purposes , 2005, Environmental management.

[7]  Trent M. Sutton,et al.  Large woody debris characteristics and contributions to pool formation in forest streams of the Boreal Shield , 2005 .

[8]  M. Mutz,et al.  Processes of Surface-Subsurface Water Exchange in a Low Energy Sand-Bed Stream , 2003 .

[9]  V. R. Schneider,et al.  GUIDE FOR SELECTING MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR NATURAL CHANNELS AND FLOOD PLAINS , 1989 .

[10]  F. Swanson,et al.  Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests , 1987 .

[11]  L. Johnson,et al.  Macroinvertebrate community structure and function associated with large wood in low gradient streams , 2003 .

[12]  Patricia A. Flebbe,et al.  Trout Use of Woody Debris and Habitat in Appalachian Wilderness Streams of North Carolina , 1995 .

[13]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment on the decomposition of wood and associated microbial activity in streams , 2004 .

[14]  Kyoichi Otsuki,et al.  Transport and retention of coarse woody debris in mountain streams: An in situ field experiment of log transport and a field survey of coarse woody debris distribution , 2002 .

[15]  James R. Karr,et al.  Relationships between Woody Debris and Fish Habitat in a Small Warmwater Stream , 1984 .

[16]  D. Merritts,et al.  Natural Streams and the Legacy of Water-Powered Mills , 2008, Science.

[17]  Daniele Bocchiola,et al.  Transport of large woody debris in the presence of obstacles , 2006 .

[18]  D. Warren,et al.  Dynamics of large wood in an eastern U.S. mountain stream , 2008 .

[19]  D. Azuma,et al.  Function and dynamics of woody debris in stream reaches in the central Sierra Nevada, California , 1998 .

[20]  J. E. Cook,et al.  Branching complexity and morphological characteristics of coarse woody structure as lacustrine fish habitat , 2005 .

[21]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Transport, Retention, and Ecological Significance of Woody Debris within a Large Ephemeral River , 1999, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[22]  Reuben M. Olson,et al.  Essentials of Engineering Fluid Mechanics , 1968 .

[23]  Kenneth Kavanagh,et al.  Re-examination of the effect of a plane boundary on force and vortex shedding of a circular cylinder , 1999 .

[24]  Standing Stocks of Large Wood in Twelve Tributary Streams along the North Shore of Lake Superior , 2010 .

[25]  Yves-François Le Lay,et al.  Influence of academic education on the perception of wood in watercourses. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  James Buchanan Wallace,et al.  Wood biofilm as a food resource for stream detritivores , 2007 .

[27]  S. Hoerner.  Fluid Dynamic Drag: Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance , 1965 .

[28]  F. Swanson,et al.  Large wood and fluvial processes , 2002 .

[29]  R. Bilby.  Removal of Woody Debris May Affect Stream Channel Stability , 1984, Journal of Forestry.

[30]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[31]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  Dynamics of wood in stream networks of the western Cascades Range, Oregon , 2008 .

[32]  B. Palik,et al.  Large wood debris recruitment on differing riparian landforms along a Gulf Coastal Plain (USA) stream: a comparison of large floods and average flows , 2007 .

[33]  Yoshiharu Ishikawa,et al.  DYNAMICS OF WOOD TRANSPORT IN STREAMS: A FLUME EXPERIMENT , 1997 .

[34]  R. Walter,et al.  Mills Natural Streams and the Legacy of Water-Powered , 2008 .

[35]  D. Bolgrien,et al.  Bank stabilization, riparian land use and the distribution of large woody debris in a regulated reach of the upper Missouri River, North Dakota, USA , 2004 .

[36]  E. Wohl,et al.  Perceptions of Wood in Rivers and Challenges for Stream Restoration in the United States , 2008, Environmental management.

[37]  R. Beschta,et al.  Characteristics of Coarse Woody Debris for Several Coastal Streams of Southeast Alaska, USA , 1990 .

[38]  E. Wohl,et al.  Wood dynamics in headwater streams of the Colorado Rocky Mountains , 2008 .

[39]  Timothy J. Beechie,et al.  Relationships between Channel Characteristics, Woody Debris, and Fish Habitat in Northwestern Washington Streams , 1997 .

[40]  R. Naiman,et al.  Sources and dynamics of large logs in a temperate floodplain river. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[41]  Stanley H. Anderson,et al.  Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit , 2002 .

[42]  Michael Manga,et al.  Field measurements of drag coefficients for model large woody debris , 2003 .

[43]  Heinz G. Stefan,et al.  Environmental controls of wood entrapment in upper Midwestern streams , 2011 .

[44]  Daniele Bocchiola,et al.  A flume experiment on the formation of wood jams in rivers , 2008 .

[45]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  When do logs move in rivers? , 2000 .

[46]  S. Hoerner.  Fluid-Dynamic Lift , 1985 .

[47]  R. Davis,et al.  The Perception of Riverscape Aesthetics: an Example from Two Hampshire Rivers , 1993 .