The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach

A model of the innovation diffusion process is developed using a micromodeling approach that explicitly considers the determinants of adoption at the individual level in a decision analytic framework, and incorporates heterogeneity in the population with respect to initial perceptions, preference characteristics, and responsiveness to information. The micromodelling approach provides a behavioral basis for explaining adoption at the disaggregate level and the consequent pattern of diffusion at the aggregate level. The analytical implications of the model are compared and contrasted with the traditional, aggregate-level, diffusion models. An advantage of our approach is its micro-theory driven flexibility in accommodating various patterns of diffusion. Examples are provided of conditions under which the model yields diffusion patterns identical to those of some well-known aggregate models. A pilot study is reported, outlining procedures for data collection and estimation of the individual-level parameters, and providing a preliminary test of the predictive performance of the model. Measurement of the individual parameters prior to product launch enables potential applications of the model for segmentation of the target population in terms of their expected adoption times.

[1]  R. Howard.  Proximal Decision Analysis , 1971 .

[2]  G. Urban,et al.  You have printed the following article : Modeling Multiattribute Utility , Risk , and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice , 2007 .

[3]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[4]  Marcel Corstjens,et al.  Formal Choice Models in Marketing , 1983 .

[5]  Robert B. Woodruff,et al.  Measurement of Consumers’ Prior Brand Information , 1972 .

[6]  David A. Aaker,et al.  A Normative Model of Consumer Information Processing , 1984 .

[7]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[8]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[9]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Encoding subjective probabilities: A psychological and psychometric review , 1983 .

[10]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Statistics : Probability, Inference and Decision , 1975 .

[11]  John R. Hauser,et al.  A Measurement Error Approach for Modeling Consumer Risk Preference , 1985 .

[12]  James Jd,et al.  Strategic Market Planning , 1990 .

[13]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance: A Reexamination , 1985 .

[14]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[15]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  A Procedure for Measuring and Estimating Consumer Preferences under Uncertainty , 1983 .

[16]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Assessment of Attribute Importances and Consumer Utility Functions: von Neumann-Morgenstern Theory Applied to Consumer Behavior , 1979 .

[17]  G. O'Mara,et al.  Farm size and the diffusion of green revolution technology ; On information and innovation diffusion : a bayesian approach , 1982 .

[18]  Hubert Gatignon,et al.  Toward a Methodology for Measuring Advertising Copy Effects , 1984 .

[19]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[20]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population : an analytical model based on an individual level approach , 1986 .

[21]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  A Multiattribute Model of Consumer Choice During Product Learning , 1985 .

[22]  L. Fourt,et al.  Early Prediction of Market Success for New Grocery Products , 1960 .

[23]  L. Hiebert,et al.  Risk, Learning, and the Adoption of Fertilizer Responsive Seed Varieties , 1974 .

[24]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Intra-Firm Diffusion, Bayesian Learning and Profitability , 1981 .

[25]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[26]  W. H. Rodgers.  Consumer behavior as risk taking; a new model and new hypotheses. , 1969 .

[27]  John R. Hauser,et al.  A Normative Methodology for Modeling Consumer Response to Innovation , 1977, Oper. Res..

[28]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review , 1979 .

[29]  J. Bettman.  Perceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test , 1973 .

[30]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Prelaunch forecasting of new consumer durables : ideas on a consumer value - priority model , 1982 .

[31]  D. Navon.  The importance of being conservative: Some reflections on human Bayesian behaviour , 1978 .

[32]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Diffusion of new products in risk-sensitive markets , 1988 .

[33]  H. D. Miller,et al.  The Theory Of Stochastic Processes , 1977, The Mathematical Gazette.

[34]  Richard F. Yalch,et al.  Consumer Response to Initial Product Trial: A Bayesian Analysis , 1980 .

[35]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  Analytical Models of Competition with Implications for Marketing: Issues, Findings, and Outlook , 1985 .

[36]  W. Viscusi.  Are Individuals Bayesian Decision Makers , 1985 .

[37]  Imran S. Currim,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Multiattribute Consumer Preference Models , 1984 .

[38]  P. Wilton,et al.  Forecasting the Ultimate Acceptance of an Innovation: The Effects of Information , 1981 .

[39]  Ivan Ross.  Perceived Risk and Consumer Behavior: a Critical Review , 1975 .

[40]  John O. Summers,et al.  Perceived Risk and Composition Models for Multiattribute Decisions , 1978 .

[41]  R. Jensen,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of an innovation of uncertain profitability , 1982 .

[42]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  The Fishbein Extended Model and Consumer Behavior , 1975 .

[43]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  A Nonuniform Influence Innovation Diffusion Model of New Product Acceptance , 1983 .

[44]  Per Lekvall,et al.  A STUDY OF SOME ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1973 .

[45]  N. Derzko,et al.  Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modelling , 1988 .

[46]  J. Pratt.  RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[47]  R. Belk,et al.  Predictors of Attendance at the Performing Arts , 1980 .

[48]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Stochastic Models for Social Processes , 1967 .

[49]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Experiments in the laboratory and the real world , 1973 .