Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model.

Some of the implications of a model of visual word recognition in which processing is conditioned by the anatomical splitting of the visual field between the two hemispheres of the brain are explored. The authors investigate the optimal processing of visually presented words within such an architecture, and, for a realistically sized lexicon of English, characterize a computationally optimal fixation point in reading. They demonstrate that this approach motivates a range of behavior observed in reading isolated words and text, including the optimal viewing position and its relationship with the preferred viewing location, the failure to fixate smaller words, asymmetries in hemisphere-specific processing, and the priority given to the exterior letters of words. The authors also show that split architectures facilitate the uptake of all the letter-position information necessary for efficient word recognition and that this information may be less specific than is normally assumed. A split model of word recognition captures a range of behavior in reading that is greater than that covered by existing models of visual word recognition.

[1]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  The Computational Exploration of Visual Word Recognition in a Split Model , 2001, Neural Computation.

[2]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Initial Fixation Location Effects in Reading Hebrew Words , 1999 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Reggia,et al.  A Neural Network Model of Lateralization during Letter Identification , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  James J. Clark,et al.  Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading , 1999, Vision Research.

[6]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  The SPLIT Model of Visual Word Recognition: Complementary Connectionist and Statistical Cognitive Modelling , 1999 .

[7]  S. Stoness,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1999 .

[8]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  James A. Reggia,et al.  Computational Studies of Lateralization of Phoneme Sequence Generation , 1998, Neural Computation.

[10]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique , 1998, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[11]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1998 .

[12]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[13]  G. Underwood Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[14]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[15]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[16]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading , 1997 .

[17]  Debra Jared,et al.  Spelling-Sound Consistency Affects the Naming of High-Frequency Words , 1997 .

[18]  S Clarke,et al.  Direct interhemispheric visual input to human speech areas , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: Investigations with a callosotomy patient , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[22]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect : On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[23]  F. Kitterle Hemispheric Communication: Mechanisms and Models , 2020 .

[24]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  C. J. Marsolek Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Recognition of CVC Syllables from LVF, RVF, and Central Locations: Hemispheric Differences and Interhemispheric Interaction , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[28]  John M. Henderson,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS DURING TRANSSACCADIC WORD RECOGNITION , 1995 .

[29]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[30]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Encoding Shape and Spatial Relations: The Role of -Receptive Field Size in Coordinating Complementary Representations , 1994 .

[31]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Hemispheric differences in sizes of receptive fields or attentional biases , 1994 .

[32]  Morihiro Sugishita,et al.  Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Bettina Mohr,et al.  Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  The Neuropsychology of High-Level Vision , 1994 .

[35]  Richard J. Mammone,et al.  Artificial neural networks for speech and vision , 1994 .

[36]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Modularity and the processing of closed-class words , 1993 .

[37]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization or Reading Habits: Evidence from Lexical Decision Research with Hebrew Words and Sentences , 1993, Brain and Language.

[38]  Nigel H. Goddard,et al.  Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1993 .

[39]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Cognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting , 1993 .

[40]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Generalization with Componential Attractors: Word and Nonword Reading in an Attractor Network , 1993 .

[41]  Emmanuel J. Yannakoudakis,et al.  An assessment of N-phoneme statistics in phoneme guessing algorithms which aim to incorporate phonotactic constraints , 1992, Speech Commun..

[42]  L. Cooper,et al.  When Networks Disagree: Ensemble Methods for Hybrid Neural Networks , 1992 .

[43]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. , 1992 .

[46]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  A. Cowey,et al.  Reflections on Blindsight , 1992 .

[48]  John R. Anderson Is human cognition adaptive? , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[49]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. , 1990 .

[51]  Colwyn Trevarthen,et al.  An Influence in Psychobiology. (Book Reviews: Brain Circuits and Functions of the Mind. Essays in Honor of Roger W. Sperry.) , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[52]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Aysenil Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric Interaction: How Do the Hemispheres Divide and Conquer a Task? , 1990, Cortex.

[54]  A. Caramazza Cognitive Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics: Advances in Models of Cognitive Function and Impairment , 1990 .

[55]  The role of the corpus callosum in the representation of the visual field in cortical areas , 1990 .

[56]  J. O'Regan Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[57]  Eileen Kowler Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[58]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[60]  Visual laterality for letter comparison: Effects of stimulus factors, response factors, and metacontrol , 1989 .

[61]  J. Sergent,et al.  Imagery in a commissurotomized patient , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  C. J. Mace,et al.  Medicine, mind and the double brain , 1988, Medical History.

[64]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[65]  A. Young,et al.  “Neglect dyslexia” and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords , 1987 .

[66]  J Sergent,et al.  A new look at the human split brain. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[67]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[68]  David Howard Reading without letters , 1987 .

[69]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The cognitive neuropsychology of language , 1987 .

[70]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Deep dyslexia since 1980. , 1987 .

[71]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. , 1987 .

[72]  Norman D. Cook,et al.  The Brain Code , 1986 .

[73]  A. Young,et al.  Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields , 1985, Brain and Language.

[74]  C. R. Lines Nasotemporal overlap investigated in a case of agenesis of the corpus callosum , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[75]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  M. Banich,et al.  Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers , 1981, Brain and Language.

[78]  K. Rayner,et al.  Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[79]  G. McConkie,et al.  Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[80]  K Rayner,et al.  Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.

[81]  G. McConkie,et al.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[82]  K. Rayner Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[83]  L. O. Harvey Single representation of the visual midline in humans , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[84]  F. Haun Functional dissociation of the hemispheres using foveal visual input , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[85]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[86]  N. Kapur,et al.  Recognition Reading in Paralexia , 1978, Cortex.

[87]  A. H. Bunt,et al.  Foveal sparing. New anatomical evidence for bilateral representation of the central retina. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[88]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[89]  G. McConkie,et al.  Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading , 1976 .

[90]  F. Allard,et al.  Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface , 1976, Brain and Language.

[91]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[92]  T. Shallice,et al.  Word Recognition in a Phonemic Dyslexic Patient , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[93]  J. Stone,et al.  The naso‐temporal division of the monkey's retina , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[94]  Y. Archibald,et al.  Language disturbance and nonverbal cognitive performance in eight patients following injury to the right hemisphere. , 1968, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[95]  R. C. Oldfield Things, Words and the Brain* , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[96]  M. Piercy Functions of the corpus callosum: Ciba Foundation Study Group No. 20. Edited by E.G. Ettlinger. J. and A. Churchill, London. 156 pp. 20s , 1966 .

[97]  J. Stone,et al.  The naso-temporal division of the cat's retina. , 1966, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[98]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Differential Recognition of Tachistoscopically Presented English and Hebrew Words in Right and Left Visual Fields , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[99]  Jon Eisenson,et al.  Language and Intellectual Modifications Associated with Right Cerebral Damage* , 1962 .