The extravehicular mobility unit: A review of environment, requirements, and design changes in the US spacesuit

Abstract Requirements are rarely static, and are ever more likely to evolve as the development time of a system stretches out and its service life increases. In this paper, we discuss the evolution of requirements for the US spacesuit, the extravehicular mobility unit (EMU), as a case study to highlight the need for flexibility in system design. We explore one fundamental environmental change, using the Space Shuttle EMU aboard the International Space Station, and the resulting EMU requirement and design changes. The EMU, like other complex systems, faces considerable uncertainty during its service life. Changes in the technical, political, or economic environment cause changes in requirements, which in turn necessitate design modifications or upgrades. We make the case that flexibility is a key attribute that needs to be embedded in the design of long-lived, complex systems to enable them to efficiently meet the inevitability of changing requirements after they have been fielded.

[1]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting change propagation in complex design , 2004 .

[2]  Bradford R. Prouty,et al.  Evolution of the Extravehicular Mobility Unit for Future Missions , 1991 .

[3]  R C Wilde.  Preparing EMU for Space Station. , 1995, Acta astronautica.

[4]  Benjamin S. Blanchard,et al.  System Engineering Management , 1991 .

[5]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Spacecraft Design Lifetime , 2002 .

[6]  Dava J Newman,et al.  Flexibility in system design and implications for aerospace systems. , 2003, Acta astronautica.

[7]  Jeff Dutton.  Extravehicular Activity Hardware for International Space Station , 1997 .

[8]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change and customisation in complex engineering domains , 2004 .

[9]  Glenn C. Lutz,et al.  EMU processing - A myth dispelled , 1991 .

[10]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: measures and design methods , 2004 .

[11]  R C Wilde,et al.  Identification and status of design improvements to the NASA Shuttle EMU for International Space Station application. , 1997, Acta astronautica.

[12]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Human-centred requirements engineering , 2004, Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2004..

[13]  Gail Goodman.  Information Requirements for Space Station Freedom EVA , 1991 .

[14]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[15]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[16]  Kenneth R. Boff,et al.  Value‐centered R&D organizations: Ten principles for characterizing, assessing, and managing value , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[17]  Gary L. Harris,et al.  The origins and technology of the advanced extravehicular space suit , 2001 .