Space exploration and global optimization for computationally intensive design problems: a rough set based approach

Modern engineering design problems often involve computation-intensive analysis and simulation processes. Design optimization based on such processes is desired to be efficient, informative and transparent. This work proposes a rough set based approach that can identify multiple sub-regions in a design space, within which all of the design points are expected to have a performance value equal to or less than a given level. The rough set method is applied iteratively on a growing sample set. A novel termination criterion is also developed to ensure a modest number of total expensive function evaluations to identify these sub-regions and search for the global optimum. The significance of the proposed method is twofold. First, it provides an intuitive method to establish the mapping from the performance space to the design space, i.e. given a performance level, its corresponding design region(s) can be identified. Such a mapping could be potentially used to explore and visualize the entire design space. Second, it can be naturally extended to a global optimization method. It also bears potential for more broad application to problems such as metamodeling-based design and robust design optimization. The proposed method was tested with a number of test problems and compared with a few well-known global optimization algorithms.

[1]  Alexander H. G. Rinnooy Kan,et al.  A stochastic method for global optimization , 1982, Math. Program..

[2]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[3]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  On Conflicts , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  Roman Slowinski,et al.  Rough Classification of Patients After Highly Selective Vagotomy for Duodenal Ulcer , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[5]  Allen C. Ward,et al.  Quantitative Inference in a Mechanical Design Compiler , 1989 .

[6]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  The Performance of a Mechanical Design `Compiler'' , 1989 .

[7]  Adam Mrózek,et al.  Rough Sets in Computer Implementation of Rule-Based Control of Industrial Processes , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[8]  R. Słowiński Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory , 1992 .

[9]  C. D. Perttunen,et al.  Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant , 1993 .

[10]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Global Optimization Using the Multistart Method , 1993 .

[11]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  A methodology for stock market analysis utilizing rough set theory , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr).

[12]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design , 1996 .

[13]  W. Ziarko,et al.  Rough sets applied to materials data , 1996 .

[14]  Aleksander Ohrn,et al.  ROSETTA -- A Rough Set Toolkit for Analysis of Data , 1997 .

[15]  Andrzej Czyzewski Learning algorithms for audio signal enhancement. Part 2 : Implementation of the rough-set method for the removal of hiss , 1997 .

[16]  J. M. Gablonsky An implementation of the direct algorithm , 1998 .

[17]  Dirk Van den Poel,et al.  Rough Sets for Database Marketing , 1998 .

[18]  Julia A. Johnson,et al.  Rough Mereology for Industrial Design , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[19]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough-Fuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend in Decision Making , 1999 .

[20]  Roman Barták,et al.  Constraint Programming: In Pursuit of the Holy Grail , 1999 .

[21]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Constraint-Based Support for Collaboration in Design and Construction , 1999 .

[22]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Statistical Approximations for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: The Problem of Size , 1999 .

[23]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Constraint-based support for negotiation in collaborative design , 2000, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[24]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  ADAPTIVE RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD - A GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION SCHEME FOR APPROXIMATION-BASED DESIGN PROBLEMS , 2001 .

[25]  David G. Ullman,et al.  Toward the ideal mechanical engineering design support system , 2002 .

[26]  C. Bloebaum,et al.  Development of visual design steering as an aid in large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization. Part II: method validation , 2002 .

[27]  Eliot Winer,et al.  Development of visual design steering as an aid in large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization. Part I: method development , 2002 .

[28]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Fuzzy Clustering Based Hierarchical Metamodeling for Design Optimization , 2002 .

[29]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Multidimensional Design Visualization in Multiobjective Optimization , 2002 .

[30]  G. G. Wang,et al.  Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points , 2003 .

[31]  T. Simpson,et al.  Fuzzy clustering based hierarchical metamodeling for design space reduction and optimization , 2004 .