The Role of the Need for Cognitive Closure in the Effectiveness of the Disrupt-Then-Reframe Influence Technique

The disrupt-then-reframe (DTR) influence technique involves confusing consumers with a disruptive message and then reducing ambiguity by reframing the message. Experiment 1 shows that the DTR technique increases retail sales in a supermarket setting. Experiment 2 shows that the DTR technique increases the willingness to pay to join a student interest group. Experiment 3 shows that the DTR technique increases student support for a tuition increase. The results also show that the DTR effect increases as the need for closure increases and that disruption motivates consumers to embrace a reframed message that facilitates closure by reducing ambiguity.

[1]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Debiasing Insights from Process Tests , 2006 .

[2]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Please, let's get an answer—any answer: Need for consumer cognitive closure , 2000 .

[3]  D. Aaker,et al.  Is Market Share all that It's Cracked up to Be? , 1985 .

[4]  D. M. Webster.  Motivated augmentation and reduction of the overattribution bias. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[6]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Multiple Source Effect in Persuasion , 1981 .

[7]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: need for closure effects on in-group bias. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Daniel D. Riner,et al.  Omega approaches to persuasion: Overcoming resistance. , 2007 .

[9]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[10]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[11]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .

[12]  Margaret C. Campbell,et al.  Goal Seeker and Persuasion Sentry: How Consumer Targets Respond to Interpersonal Marketing Persuasion , 2004 .

[13]  James J. Kellaris,et al.  The Role of Selective Information Processing in Price-Quality Inference , 2004 .

[14]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of the Affective and Cognitive Bases of Attitudes in Susceptibility to Affectively and Cognitively Based Persuasion , 1999 .

[15]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[17]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Effects of Epistemic Motivations on the Use of Accessible Constructs in Social Judgment , 1995 .

[18]  Adriaan T.H. Pruyn,et al.  “If You Can’t Dazzle Them with Brilliance, Baffle Them with Nonsense”: Extending the Impact of the Disrupt-Then-Reframe Technique of Social Influence , 2004 .

[19]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  A Disrupt-Then-Reframe Technique of Social Influence , 1999 .

[20]  A Disrupt-Then-Reframe Technique of Social Influence , 1999 .

[21]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  A Theory Of Action Identification , 1985 .

[22]  David E. Sprott,et al.  Self-Monitoring and Susceptibility to the Influence of Self-Prophecy , 2006 .

[23]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[24]  Charles E. Gengler,et al.  What's in a Name? A Complimentary Means of Persuasion , 1995 .

[25]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Information Availability as a Determinant of Multiple Request Effectiveness , 1983 .

[26]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  A. Kruglanski.  The Psychology of Closed Mindedness , 2004 .

[28]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications for Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages , 1998 .

[29]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Self‐Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration , 2005 .

[30]  M. Erickson,et al.  THE CONFUSION TECHNIQUE IN HYPNOSIS. , 1964, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[31]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  What Makes You So Sure? Effects of Epistemic Motivations on judgmental Confidence , 1987 .

[32]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Approach-Avoidance Model of Persuasion: Alpha and Omega Strategies for Change , 2004 .

[33]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[34]  F. Kardes,et al.  Market Share Overestimation and the Noncomplementarity Effect , 1998 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.