Limitations in Drivers' Ability to Recognize Pedestrians at Night

This study quantified drivers' ability to recognize pedestrians at night. Ten young and 10 older participants drove around a closed road circuit and responded when they first recognized a pedestrian. Four pedestrian clothing and two beam conditions were tested. Results demonstrate that driver age, clothing configuration, headlamp beam, and glare all significantly affect performance. Drivers recognized only 5% of pedestrians in the most challenging condition (low beams, black clothing, glare), whereas drivers recognized 100% of the pedestrians who wore retroreflective clothing configured to depict biological motion (no glare). In the absence of glare, mean recognition distances varied from 0.0 m (older drivers, low beam, black clothing) to 220 m (722 feet; younger drivers, high beam, retroreflective biomotion). These data provide new motivation to minimize interactions between vehicular and pedestrian traffic at night and suggest garment designs to maximize pedestrian conspicuity when these interactions are unavoidable.

[1]  Johnell O. Brooks,et al.  Educational Interventions Successfully Reduce Pedestrians' Overestimates of Their Own Nighttime Visibility , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Joanne M Wood,et al.  On-road measures of pedestrians' estimates of their own nighttime conspicuity. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[3]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Differentiation of Visibility and Alcohol as Contributors to Twilight Road Fatalities , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[4]  D. Roenker,et al.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  J. Wood,et al.  Effect of Visual Impairment on Driving , 1994, Human factors.

[6]  Kenneth W. Gish,et al.  DRIVER BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE USING AN INFRARED NIGHT VISION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM , 2002 .

[7]  M. Flannagan,et al.  The role of ambient light level in fatal crashes: inferences from daylight saving time transitions. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  P M Garvey,et al.  Age differences in dynamic contrast thresholds. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  R A Tyrrell,et al.  The assured clear distance ahead rule: implications for nighttime traffic safety and the law. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  M. Frisén,et al.  How good is normal visual acuity? , 2004, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie.

[11]  J Luoma,et al.  Effects of retroreflector positioning on nighttime recognition of pedestrians. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  K E Higgins,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of age, test-retest, and psychophysical method. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  Aashto,et al.  A Policy on geometric desing of highways and streets. , 1984 .

[14]  J. Brabyn,et al.  Seeing into old age: vision function beyond acuity. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  K. Rumar.  The basic driver error: Late detection : Ergonomics, 1990, 33.10 & 11, 1281–1290, 11 refs , 1991 .

[16]  K Rumar,et al.  The basic driver error: late detection. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[17]  David F. Preusser,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE CONSPICUITY-ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS , 1986 .

[18]  G. M. Long,et al.  The nature and basis of age-related changes in dynamic visual acuity. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[19]  R. G. Mortimer.  Evaluation of meeting beams by field tests and computer simulation. Final report , 1974 .

[20]  D. Alfred Owens,et al.  Biological Motion and Nighttime Pedestrian Conspicuity , 1994 .

[21]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Changes in the lower displacement limit for motion with age , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[22]  Susan T. Chrysler,et al.  Age Differences in Visual Abilities in Nighttime Driving Field Conditions , 1996 .

[23]  The University of Aston in Birmingham , 1965, Nature.

[24]  M J Allen,et al.  ACTUAL PEDESTRIAN VISIBILITY AND THE PEDESTRIAN'S ESTIMATE OF HIS OWN VISIBILITY* , 1970, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  Mark Ivan Woolf,et al.  Application of parallax for the measurement of visibility distances in the open-road environment , 1998 .

[26]  I. Brown,et al.  Vision in Vehicles III , 1991 .

[27]  David Whitaker,et al.  Neural contribution to spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity decline in healthy ageing eyes , 1990, Vision Research.

[28]  David Shinar.  Actual versus estimated night-time pedestrian visibility , 1984 .