Coordinating vector field equations and diagrams with a serious game in introductory physics

Mathematical reasoning with algebraic and graphical representations is important for a throughout understanding of physics problems and concepts. Many problems require students to fluently move between algebraic and graphical representations. We developed a freely available serious game to challenge the representational fluency of introductory students regarding vector fields. Within the game, interactive puzzles are solved using different types of vector fields that must be configured with the correct mathematical parameters. A reward system implemented in the game prevents from using trial-and-error approaches and instead encourages the player to establish a mental connection between the graphical representation of the vector field and the (algebraic) equation before taking any action. For correct solutions, the player receives points and can unlock further levels. The graphics implemented in the game make the effects of changing the direction of a field or its magnitude visible and thus can help the learner gain a throughout understanding of vector fields. We report about the aim of the game from an educational perspective, describe potential learning scenarios and put in perspective the use of the game in the classroom. Video Abstract: Coordinating vector field equations and diagrams with a serious game in introductory physics

[1]  J. Huizinga.  Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[2]  R. Feynman.  The Character of Physical Law , 1965 .

[3]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Designing Computer Games to Help Physics Students Understand Newton's Laws of Motion , 1984 .

[4]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  Student perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software , 1991 .

[5]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[6]  R. D. Knight,et al.  The vector knowledge of beginning physics students , 1995 .

[7]  Eric L. Dey.  Working with Low Survey Response Rates: The Efficacy of Weighting Adjustments , 1995 .

[8]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Solving physics problems with multiple representations , 1997 .

[9]  J. Murray.  Hamlet on the Holodeck , 1997 .

[10]  Ruhama Even,et al.  Factors involved in linking representations of functions , 1998 .

[11]  Barbara S. Page.  Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[12]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[13]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[14]  Christian Kautz,et al.  Student use of vectors in introductory mechanics , 2001 .

[15]  Xueli Zou,et al.  Multiple representations of work-energy processes , 2001 .

[16]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  Examining the Effects of Different Multiple Representational Systems in Learning Primary Mathematics , 2002 .

[17]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Initial understanding of vector concepts among students in introductory physics courses , 2003 .

[18]  Shannon K. Gilmartin,et al.  Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys , 2003 .

[19]  Tina Seufert.  Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[20]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[21]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[22]  S. Wilson.  What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , 2006 .

[23]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  An Overview of Recent Research on Multiple Representations , 2007 .

[24]  Michael C. Wittmann,et al.  Comparing Student Use of Mathematical and Physical Vector Representations , 2007 .

[25]  Duncan David Nulty,et al.  The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? , 2008 .

[26]  Tracy Fullerton.  Game design workshop : a playcentric approach to creating innovative games , 2008 .

[27]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The Educational Value of Multiple-representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts , 2008 .

[28]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Representational disfluency in algebra: evidence from student gestures and speech , 2009 .

[29]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Multiple Representations and Self-Explanation Prompts Support Learning of Fractions , 2009, AIED.

[30]  J. Elen,et al.  Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: a critical review , 2009 .

[31]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Adding Instructional Features That Promote Learning in a Game-Like Environment , 2010 .

[32]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Andrea Corradini,et al.  Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation through Educational Games , 2011 .

[34]  P. Toprac.  Motivating By Design: Using Digital-Game Based Learning Techniques to Create an Interesting Problem-Based Learning Environment , 2011 .

[35]  Soumya D.Mohanty,et al.  Teaching introductory undergraduate physics using commercial video games , 2011, 1107.5298.

[36]  Traci Sitzmann.  A META-ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED SIMULATION GAMES , 2011 .

[37]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Using Video Games to Support Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Learning of Basic Physics Principles , 2011 .

[38]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  What counts as a flexible representational choice? An evaluation of students’ representational choices to solve linear function problems , 2012 .

[39]  Elizabeth Gire,et al.  Graphical representations of vector functions in upper-division E&M , 2012 .

[40]  Jouni Viiri,et al.  Relations between Representational Consistency, Conceptual Understanding of the Force Concept, and Scientific Reasoning. , 2012 .

[41]  James M. Boyle,et al.  A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  The atomic intrinsic integration approach: A structured methodology for the design of games for the conceptual understanding of physics , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[43]  John W. Rice,et al.  The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education , 2012, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[44]  M. D. Cock,et al.  Representation use and Strategy choice in physics problem solving , 2012 .

[45]  P. Wouters,et al.  A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games , 2013 .

[46]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Game-Based Learning in Science Education: A Review of Relevant Research , 2013 .

[47]  Marjorie Darrah,et al.  Are Virtual Labs as Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two Major Universities , 2014 .

[48]  Genaro Zavala,et al.  Test of understanding of vectors: A reliable multiple-choice vector concept test , 2014 .

[49]  Phil Wilkinson,et al.  A Brief History of Serious Games , 2016, Entertainment Computing and Serious Games.

[50]  Jonas Gloeckner,et al.  Rules Of Play Game Design Fundamentals , 2016 .

[51]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Digital Games, Design, and Learning , 2016, Review of educational research.

[52]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning , 2017 .

[53]  Mieke De Cock,et al.  Student Difficulties Regarding Symbolic and Graphical Representations of Vector Fields. , 2017 .

[54]  Sara de Freitas,et al.  Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games , 2018, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[55]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Instruction-based clinical eye-tracking study on the visual interpretation of divergence : how do students look at vector field plots? , 2018 .

[56]  A. Sušac,et al.  Using the Rasch model to analyze the test of understanding of vectors , 2018, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[57]  Adriana Cardinot,et al.  Game-Based Learning to Engage Students With Physics and Astronomy Using a Board Game , 2019, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[58]  Yasanthi Kottegoda,et al.  Disconnect between undergraduates’ understanding of the algebraic and geometric aspects of vectors , 2019, European Journal of Physics.

[59]  G. Tormen,et al.  Testing students ability to use derivatives, integrals, and vectors in a purely mathematical context and in a physical context , 2020 .

[60]  P. Klein,et al.  Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes , 2020 .