Digital home monitoring for capturing daily fluctuation of symptoms; a longitudinal repeated measures study: Long Covid Multi-disciplinary Consortium to Optimise Treatments and Services across the NHS (a LOCOMOTION study)

Introduction A substantial proportion of COVID-19 survivors continue to have symptoms more than 3 months after infection, especially of those who required medical intervention. Lasting symptoms are wide-ranging, and presentation varies between individuals and fluctuates within an individual. Improved understanding of undulation in symptoms and triggers may improve efficacy of healthcare providers and enable individuals to better self-manage their Long Covid. We present a protocol where we aim to develop and examine the feasibility and usability of digital home monitoring for capturing daily fluctuation of symptoms in individuals with Long Covid and provide data to facilitate a personalised approach to the classification and management of Long Covid symptoms. Methods and analysis This study is a longitudinal prospective cohort study of adults with Long Covid accessing 10 National Health Service (NHS) rehabilitation services in the UK. We aim to recruit 400 people from participating NHS sites. At referral to study, 6 weeks and 12 weeks, participants will complete demographic data (referral to study) and clinical outcome measures, including ecological momentary assessment (EMA) using personal mobile devices. EMA items are adapted from the COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale items and include self-reported activities, symptoms and psychological factors. Passive activity data will be collected through wrist-worn sensors. We will use latent class growth models to identify trajectories of experience, potential phenotypes defined by co-occurrence of symptoms and inter-relationships between stressors, symptoms and participation in daily activities. We anticipate that n=300 participants provide 80% power to detect a 20% improvement in fatigue over 12 weeks in one class of patients relative to another. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the Yorkshire & The Humber—Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21/YH/0276). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at conferences. Trial registration number ISRCTN15022307.

[1]  D. O'Connor,et al.  Effects of COVID-19-related worry and rumination on mental health and loneliness during the pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 mental health & wellbeing study. , 2022, Journal of mental health.

[2]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  LOng COvid Multidisciplinary consortium Optimising Treatments and servIces acrOss the NHS (LOCOMOTION): protocol for a mixed-methods study in the UK , 2022, BMJ Open.

[3]  Nelson B Rodrigues,et al.  Registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID: a scoping review and recommendations for research , 2022, Infectious diseases.

[4]  A. Gebremedhin,et al.  Developing a prediction model to estimate the true burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in hospitalised children in Western Australia , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[5]  H. Ohdan,et al.  Long COVID occurrence in COVID-19 survivors , 2022, Scientific reports.

[6]  M. De Craemer,et al.  Comparison of Outcomes Derived from the ActiGraph GT3X+ and the Axivity AX3 Accelerometer to Objectively Measure 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  L. Fritsche,et al.  Global Prevalence of Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review , 2021, medRxiv.

[8]  A. Dagens,et al.  Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review , 2021, BMJ Global Health.

[9]  E. Sapey,et al.  Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review , 2021, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[10]  N. Preston,et al.  The COVID‐19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19‐YRS): Application and psychometric analysis in a post‐COVID‐19 syndrome cohort , 2021, medRxiv.

[11]  C. Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas,et al.  Prevalence of post-COVID-19 symptoms in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, European Journal of Internal Medicine.

[12]  R. Jayadevan,et al.  Long COVID: An overview , 2021, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.

[13]  D. Schacter,et al.  Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science , 2020, British journal of psychology.

[14]  A. Falavigna,et al.  Remote Patient Monitoring: A Systematic Review. , 2020, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[15]  L. Jason,et al.  A Brief Questionnaire to Assess Post-Exertional Malaise , 2018, Diagnostics.

[16]  A. Pincus,et al.  The Questionable Ecological Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment: Considerations for Design and Analysis , 2017, Research in human development.

[17]  K. Malterud,et al.  Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[18]  C. Hoppmann,et al.  Ecological Momentary Assessment , 2015 .

[19]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[20]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Decision Making and Mental Capacity , 2011 .

[21]  藤倉雄二,et al.  わが国における成人市中肺炎の原因微生物の変遷(Meta‐analysis and systematic review) , 2017 .

[22]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .

[23]  Living with Covid19 – Second review , 2022 .