Pure wave mechanics and the very idea of empirical adequacy

Hugh Everett III proposed his relative-state formulation of pure wave mechanics as a solution to the quantum measurement problem. He sought to address the theory’s determinate record and probability problems by showing that, while counterintuitive, pure wave mechanics was nevertheless empirically faithful and hence empirical acceptable. We will consider what Everett meant by empirical faithfulness. The suggestion will be that empirical faithfulness is well understood as a weak variety of empirical adequacy. The thought is that the very idea of empirical adequacy might be renegotiated in the context of a new physical theory given the theory’s other virtues. Everett’s argument for pure wave mechanics provides a concrete example of such a renegotiation.

[1]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds , 2000 .

[2]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[3]  A. Kent,et al.  Many worlds? : Everett, quantum theory, and reality , 2010 .

[4]  David Deutsch,et al.  The fabric of reality : the science of parallel universes-- and its implications , 1997 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  The Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics : collected works 1955-1980 with commentary , 2012 .

[6]  How to Take a Photograph of Another Everett World , 1986 .

[7]  橋本 到 On Everett′s "Relative State"Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1987 .

[8]  David Deutsch Quantum theory of probability and decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  H. Zeh On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory , 1970 .

[10]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  The Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2015 .

[11]  A. Kent One world versus many: the inadequacy of Everettian accounts of evolution, probability, and scientific confirmation , 2009, 0905.0624.

[12]  Robert L. Weber,et al.  The scientist speculates , 1962 .

[13]  David Z. Albert 8. Probability in the Everett Picture , 2010 .

[14]  J. Barrett A Structural Interpretation of Pure Wave Mechanics , 2010 .

[15]  R. Omnes Decoherence and Ontology , 2019, Synthese Library.

[16]  Hugh Everett,et al.  The Theory of the Universal Wave Function , 2015 .

[17]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  On the Faithful Interpretation of Pure Wave Mechanics , 2011, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[18]  D. Deutsch The fabric of reality , 1997, The Art of Political Storytelling.

[19]  J. Barrett Everett’s pure wave mechanics and the notion of worlds , 2011 .

[20]  D. Albert Quantum Mechanics and Experience , 1992 .

[21]  Empirical Adequacy and the Availability of Reliable Records in Quantum Mechanics , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[22]  W. Myrvold,et al.  Everett and evidence , 2008 .

[23]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  Quantum mechanics and reality , 1970 .

[24]  S. Saunders Many Worlds: an introduction , 2010 .

[25]  Meir Hemmo,et al.  The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds , 2002 .

[26]  David Wallace,et al.  How to Prove the Born Rule , 2010 .

[27]  Ian D. Lawrie,et al.  The emergent multiverse – quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation , 2016 .

[28]  On what it takes to be a world , 1995 .