The Timecourse of Sentence Processing in the Brain

[1]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[2]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[3]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[5]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[7]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[8]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[10]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[13]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Friederici.  The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[15]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[16]  M. Kutas,et al.  The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Neurobiology of Language Comprehension , 1998 .

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[20]  J. Hopf,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials and Case Information in Syntactic Ambiguities , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[23]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[24]  J. Nicol,et al.  On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies. , 1999 .

[25]  M. Ullman.  A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  S. Frisch,et al.  The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing , 2001, Neuroreport.

[27]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[31]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[34]  David Poeppel,et al.  The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time' , 2003, Speech Commun..

[35]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  M. Bar.  A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[38]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  S. Sereno,et al.  Context Effects in Word Recognition , 2003, Psychological science.

[41]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The Influence of Semantic and Syntactic Context Constraints on Lexical Selection and Integration in Spoken-Word Comprehension as Revealed by ERPs , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  G. Dogil,et al.  Where and how does grammatically geared processing take place—and why is Broca’s area often involved. A coordinated fMRI/ERBP study of language processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of syntactic and semantic errors , 2005, Neuroreport.

[49]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[51]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  H. Kolk,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences , 2006, Brain Research.

[55]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[56]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Early MEG Activation Dynamics in the Left Temporal and Inferior Frontal Cortex Reflect Semantic Context Integration , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Setting the Stage for Automatic Syntax Processing: The Mismatch Negativity as an Indicator of Syntactic Priming , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  P. Hagoort.  The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[60]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Beyond the sentence given , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  Imaging cortical dynamics of language processing with the event-related optical signal , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[64]  Kara D. Federmeier.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[65]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  The internal structure of the N400: Frequency characteristics of a language-related ERP component , 2007 .

[66]  A. Friederici,et al.  The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture , 2008 .

[67]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[68]  David A. Balota,et al.  Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .

[69]  Kemal Oflazer,et al.  Erratum: Dependency Parsing of Turkish , 2008, CL.

[70]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Chapter 1 Time for Meaning: Electrophysiology Provides Insights into the Dynamics of Representation and Processing in Semantic Memory , 2009 .

[71]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The N400 as a correlate of interpretively relevant linguistic rules: Evidence from Hindi , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit , 2009, Neuroreport.

[73]  J. Dien.  Foreword to the special issue “Before the N400: Early Latency Language ERPs” , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[74]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[76]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[77]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain , 2009, Brain and Language.

[79]  J. Connolly,et al.  Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom–up and top–down effects on spoken word processing , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[80]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[81]  K. Rayner,et al.  Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event-related potential research , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[82]  Karl J. Friston.  The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[83]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension , 2010, Brain and Language.

[85]  Franziska Kretzschmar,et al.  The electrophysiological reality of parafoveal processing: On the validity of language-related ERPs in natural reading , 2010 .

[86]  E. Chang,et al.  Categorical Speech Representation in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[87]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.

[88]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[89]  S. Cappa,et al.  Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[90]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[91]  A. Friederici.  The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[92]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[93]  Suzanne Dikker,et al.  Before the N400: Effects of lexical–semantic violations in visual cortex , 2011, Brain and Language.

[94]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Meaningful physical changes mediate lexical–semantic integration: Top-down and form-based bottom-up information sources interact in the N400 , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[95]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[96]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[97]  C. Price,et al.  The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[98]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension , 2011, Brain and Language.

[99]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[100]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Perceptions as Hypotheses: Saccades as Experiments , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[101]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[102]  David Poeppel,et al.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[103]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  The time course of predictability effects in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012 .

[104]  Heather Sheridan,et al.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[105]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies , 2012, Brain and Language.

[106]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Distribution of Fixation Durations During Reading : Effects of Stimulus Quality , 2011 .

[107]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Ultra-rapid access to words in the brain , 2012, Nature Communications.

[108]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[109]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Reconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal–ventral stream model of sentence comprehension , 2013, Brain and Language.

[110]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: An eye movement analysis , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[111]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[112]  G. Kuperberg,et al.  Friendly drug-dealers and terrifying puppies: Affective primacy can attenuate the N400 effect in emotional discourse contexts , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[113]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Cross-linguistic variation in the neurophysiological response to semantic processing: Evidence from anomalies at the borderline of awareness , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[114]  Blair C. Armstrong,et al.  The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[115]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned , 2014, Brain and Language.