Third International Congress on MR-mammography, 25-27 September 2003, Jena, Germany - Abstracts

[1]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Angiogenesis , 2000, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI of breast: the most sensitive method for detecting multicentric carcinomas in female breast? , 1993, European Radiology.

[3]  Joachim Böttcher,et al.  Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning , 2003, European Radiology.

[4]  P. Carmeliet.  Angiogenesis in health and disease , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[5]  P. Choyke,et al.  Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[6]  M. Knopp,et al.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  A. Malich,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[8]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning—application of this new technique for lymph node evaluation in children , 2003, Pediatric Radiology.

[9]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Nonrigid image registration in shared-memory multiprocessor environments with application to brains, breasts, and bees , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  Werner A. Kaiser,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning as a new imaging modality in breast cancer detection—a short review of clinical value on breast application, limitations and perspectives , 2003 .

[14]  P J Drew,et al.  Current applications and future direction of MR mammography , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  Robert C. Brasch,et al.  Macromolecular contrast agents for MR mammography: current status , 2003, European Radiology.

[16]  R. Warren,et al.  Is breast MRI ever useful in a mammographic screening programme? , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[17]  C. Riedl,et al.  Elektrische Impedanzmessung in der Abklärung von Brustläsionen: Vergleich mit Mammographie, Sonographie und Histopathologie , 2002 .

[18]  J. Peterse,et al.  Breast MR imaging in women at increased lifetime risk of breast cancer: clinical system for computerized assessment of breast lesions initial results. , 2002, Radiology.

[19]  Sarah Lenington,et al.  Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Gesine Hellwig,et al.  Dynamic MR mammography: three-dimensional real-time visualization of contrast enhancement in virtual reality. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[21]  D. McDonald,et al.  Significance of blood vessel leakiness in cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[22]  L. Esserman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for primary breast cancer management: current role and new applications. , 2002, Endocrine-related cancer.

[23]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[24]  Edna Furman-Haran,et al.  Parametric analysis of breast MRI. , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  L. Liberman,et al.  Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Claus D Claussen,et al.  Diagnostic Potential of Targeted Electrical Impedance Scanning in Classifying Suspicious Breast Lesions , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[27]  R. Lucht,et al.  Neural network-based segmentation of dynamic MR mammographic images. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  M. Knopp,et al.  [Comparison of methods for quantifying contrast enhancement exemplified by dynamic MRI mammography]. , 2002, Der Radiologe.

[29]  C. Kuhl.  High-risk screening: multi-modality surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer (proven or suspected carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene). , 2002, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[30]  M. Thelen,et al.  [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[31]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Exploration of Time-Varying Data for Medical Diagnosis , 2002, VMV.

[32]  I. Zuna,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of breast cancer using dynamic MRI with high temporal resolution , 2002, European Radiology.

[33]  N V Ruiter,et al.  AUTOMATIC IMAGE MATCHING FOR BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSTICS BY A 3D DEFORMATION MODEL OF THE MAMMA , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[34]  Luis Santamaría,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnosis , 2002, European Radiology.

[35]  J. Debus,et al.  A new noninvasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. , 2001, Cancer research.

[36]  Ruth Warren.  Is breast MRI mature enough to be recommended for general use? , 2001, The Lancet.

[37]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Methods for Modeling and Predicting Mechanical Deformations of the Breast Under External Perturbations , 2001, MICCAI.

[38]  A R Padhani,et al.  Challenges for imaging angiogenesis. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[39]  Thomas Boehm,et al.  Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system , 2001, European Radiology.

[40]  R. Baum,et al.  Evaluation of therapy response in breast and ovarian cancer patients by positron emission tomography (PET). , 2001, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[41]  Gunnar Brix,et al.  Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience , 2001, European Radiology.

[42]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 2001, Radiology.

[43]  M. Knopp,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI using Gd‐DTPA: Interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  F. Kelcz,et al.  Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[45]  N M Hylton,et al.  Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[47]  R. Brasch,et al.  Tumor microvascular characterization using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) in an experimental breast cancer model , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  D Hahn,et al.  Understanding Why Contrast Enhancement in Dynamic MRI Is Not Reproducible: Illustration with a Simple Phantom , 2001, The breast journal.

[49]  U. Bick,et al.  Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria , 2001, European Radiology.

[50]  D M Shames,et al.  MR imaging characterization of microvessels in experimental breast tumors by using a particulate contrast agent with histopathologic correlation. , 2001, Radiology.

[51]  A. Malicha,et al.  Additional value of electrical impedance scanning : experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions , 2001 .

[52]  G Brix,et al.  Classification of signal-time curves from dynamic MR mammography by neural networks. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[53]  R. Anderson,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning: a new technique in the diagnosis of lymph nodes in which malignancy is suspected on ultrasound. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[54]  U. Fischer,et al.  International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[55]  C K Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[56]  D. Drost,et al.  Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[57]  S. Wurdinger,et al.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[58]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases , 2000, Nature.

[59]  E A Sickles,et al.  Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[60]  R. Brasch,et al.  MRI characterization of tumors and grading angiogenesis using macromolecular contrast media: status report. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[61]  D Krebs,et al.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. , 2000, Radiology.

[62]  R K Jain,et al.  Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[63]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[64]  G Brix,et al.  Elastic matching of dynamic MR mammographic images , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[65]  R. Anderson,et al.  On Electrical Impedance Scanning - Principles and Simulations , 2000 .

[66]  H. Sittek,et al.  Electrical impedance measurement of the breast: effect of hormonal changes associated with the menstrual cycle , 2000, European Radiology.

[67]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI of breast tumors , 2000, European Radiology.

[68]  E. Grabbe,et al.  A multipurpose phantom for quality assurance of contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast , 2000, European Radiology.

[69]  D M Ikeda,et al.  Lesion Diagnosis Working Group Report , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[70]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[71]  E Grabbe,et al.  Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. , 1999, Radiology.

[72]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: User‐defined versus semi‐automated region‐of‐interest analysis , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[73]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[74]  G Brix,et al.  Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: Blood‐tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[75]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[76]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[77]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[78]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[79]  G. Glover,et al.  Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[80]  B K Rutt,et al.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[81]  D M Shames,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[82]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[83]  Volker Barth,et al.  Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[84]  J F Debatin,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[85]  M. Wendland,et al.  Macromolecular contrast media-enhanced MRI estimates of microvascular permeability correlate with histopathologic tumor grade. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[86]  E Grabbe,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Guided Localization and Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions , 1998, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[87]  J Jossinet,et al.  The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[88]  S. Delorme,et al.  Non-invasive vascular imaging: assessing tumour vascularity , 1998, European Radiology.

[89]  M. Friedrich,et al.  MRI of the breast: state of the art , 1998, European Radiology.

[90]  H. Degani,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and analysis at high spatial resolution of MCF7 human breast tumors. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[91]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[92]  Scott Fields,et al.  Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[93]  M. Knopp,et al.  [Methodological approaches to quantitative evaluation of microcirculation in tissues with dynamic magnetic resonance tomography]. , 1997, Der Radiologe.

[94]  A Horsman,et al.  Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[95]  Michael Brady,et al.  Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[96]  R. Jain,et al.  Transmural coupling of fluid flow in microcirculatory network and interstitium in tumors. , 1997, Microvascular research.

[97]  A Heinig,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[98]  P. L. Davis,et al.  Sensitivity of enhanced MRI for the detection of breast cancer: new, multicentric, residual, and recurrent , 1997, European Radiology.

[99]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical modelling, simulation and prediction of tumour-induced angiogenesis. , 1996, Invasion & metastasis.

[100]  J P Morucci,et al.  Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part I: Bioimpedance measurement. Second section: impedance spectrometry. , 1996, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[101]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[102]  M Recht,et al.  Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[103]  R. Gilles,et al.  Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. , 1993, Radiology.

[104]  E Grabbe,et al.  [Signal characteristics of malignant and benign lesions in dynamic 2D-MRT of the breast]. , 1993, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[105]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[106]  E. Frei,et al.  Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements. , 1990, Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering.

[107]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[108]  Stuchly,et al.  Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[109]  T Iritani,et al.  [In vivo measurements of electrical bio-impedance of breast tumors]. , 1988, Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi.