Probabilistic Analysis of Major Construction Materials in the Life Cycle Embodied Environmental Cost of Korean Apartment Buildings

This study employs probabilistic analysis to evaluate the life cycle embodied environmental cost of Korean apartment buildings, with a focus on six major construction materials. To this end, the bill of materials was analyzed for 443 Korean apartment buildings according to the type and plan form, and probability density functions (PDFs) were established for the input quantities of the six materials under consideration. Life cycle scenarios were then examined for each material, and their respective life cycle embodied environmental cost factors were established, using a monetary valuation-based damage cost life cycle analysis model. The estimated environmental costs were evaluated by apartment structural type and plan form, based on probability distributions using the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Building life cycle embodied environmental cost was estimated between 16.87 USD/m2 and 23.03 USD/m2 (90% confidence interval). Among the structure types analyzed, the highest costs were associated with the wall structure, followed by rigid frame and flat plate structures; at the plan form level, costs followed the sequence plate-type > mixed-type > tower type for a given type of structure.

[1]  Patricia P.A. Evangelista,et al.  Environmental performance analysis of residential buildings in Brazil using life cycle assessment (LCA) , 2018 .

[2]  T. Theodosiou,et al.  Normalising and assessing carbon emissions in the building sector: A review on the embodied CO 2 emissions of residential buildings , 2018 .

[3]  Xiaocun Zhang,et al.  Stochastic analysis of embodied emissions of building construction: A comparative case study in China , 2017 .

[4]  Walaa S.E. Ismaeel,et al.  Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in Green building rating systems , 2018 .

[5]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Development of a building life cycle carbon emissions assessment program (BEGAS 2.0) for Korea׳s green building index certification system , 2016 .

[6]  Saqib Javed,et al.  The Dutch approach for assessing and reducing environmental impacts of building materials , 2017 .

[7]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Green Template for Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings Based on Building Information Modeling: Focus on Embodied Environmental Impact , 2015 .

[8]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools , 2017 .

[9]  Hyo Seon Park,et al.  A model for predicting the environmental impacts of educational facilities in the project planning phase , 2015 .

[10]  Rahman Azari,et al.  Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[11]  Wahidul K. Biswas,et al.  Carbon footprint and embodied energy consumption assessment of building construction works in Western Australia , 2014 .

[12]  Ali Tighnavard Balasbaneh,et al.  Combinations of building construction material for residential building for the global warming mitigation for Malaysia , 2015 .

[13]  Zhihua Zhou,et al.  Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis , 2017 .

[14]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials , 2017 .

[16]  Z. L. Oliveira,et al.  Decision making process assisted by life cycle assessment:greenhouse gas emission , 2017 .

[17]  Kyong Ju Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment based environmental impact estimation model for pre-stressed concrete beam bridge in the early design phase , 2017 .

[18]  Hanbin Luo,et al.  Assessment of material related embodied carbon of an office building in Sri Lanka , 2018 .

[19]  Bryan A. McCabe,et al.  An embodied carbon and embodied energy appraisal of a section of Irish motorway constructed in peatlands , 2015 .

[20]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends , 2013 .

[21]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Integrated building life-cycle assessment model to support South Korea's green building certification system (G-SEED) , 2017 .

[22]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Evaluating the embodied environmental impacts of major building tasks and materials of apartment buildings in Korea , 2017 .

[23]  Bogusław Bieda,et al.  Application of stochastic approach based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for life cycle inventory (LCI) to the steel process chain: case study. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[25]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  Systematic method for the sustainability analysis of refurbishment concepts of exterior walls , 2012 .

[26]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Development of an optimum design program (SUSB-OPTIMUM) for the life cycle CO2 assessment of an apartment house in Korea , 2014 .

[27]  Dimitrios A. Georgakellos,et al.  A probabilistic framework for the evaluation of products' environmental performance using life cycle approach and Principal Component Analysis , 2013 .

[28]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Factoring in embodied GHG emissions when assessing the environmental performance of building , 2016 .

[29]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  An integrated assessment system for managing life cycle CO2 emissions of a building , 2017 .

[30]  A. Meneghelli.  Whole-building embodied carbon of a North American LEED-certified library: Sensitivity analysis of the environmental impact of buildings materials , 2018 .

[31]  Darli Rodrigues Vieira,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review , 2016 .

[32]  Hae Jin Kang.  Development of a systematic model for an assessment tool for sustainable buildings based on a structural framework , 2015 .

[33]  F. Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Embodied energy versus operational energy : showing the shortcomings of the energy performance building directive (EPBD) , 2011 .

[34]  Yong Geng,et al.  Embodied GHG emissions of building materials in Shanghai , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  An assessment framework for analyzing the embodied carbon impacts of residential buildings in China , 2014 .

[36]  Dongping Fang,et al.  GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies , 2016 .

[37]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[38]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Design and construction strategies for reducing embodied impacts from buildings – Case study analysis , 2018 .

[39]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review , 2014 .

[40]  Vittal S. Anantatmula,et al.  Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction , 2011 .

[41]  Chris Beckett,et al.  Life cycle analysis of environmental impact vs. durability of stabilised rammed earth , 2017 .

[42]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  The development of environmental load evaluation system of a standard Korean apartment house , 2011 .

[43]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Environmental impacts of substituting tempered glass with polycarbonate in construction – An attributional and consequential life cycle perspective , 2016 .

[44]  Srinivasan Ravi,et al.  Comparison of embodied energy and environmental impact of alternative materials used in reticulated dome construction , 2016 .

[45]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Development of building materials embodied greenhouse gases assessment criteria and system (BEGAS) in the newly revised Korea Green Building Certification System (G-SEED) , 2014 .

[46]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas , 2015 .

[47]  Rakhyun Kim,et al.  Analysis of Embodied Environmental Impacts of Korean Apartment Buildings Considering Major Building Materials , 2018 .

[48]  Jing Wu,et al.  Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings , 2018 .