Discrimination of Direct and Indirect Interactions in a Network of Regulatory Effects

The matter of concern are algorithms for the discrimination of direct from indirect regulatory effects from an interaction graph built up by error-prone measurements. Many of these algorithms can be cast as a rule for the removal of a single edge of the graph, such that the remaining graph is still consistent with the data. A set of mild conditions is given under which iterated application of such a rule leads to a unique minimal consistent graph. We show that three of the common methods for direct interactions search fulfill these conditions, thus providing a justification of their use. The main issues a reconstruction algorithm has to deal with, are the noise in the data, the presence of regulatory cycles, and the direction of the regulatory effects. We introduce a novel rule that, in contrast to the previously mentioned methods, simultaneously takes into account all these aspects. An efficient algorithm for the computation of the minimal graph is given, whose time complexity is cubic in the number of vertices of the graph. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our method in a simulation study.

[1]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  The Transitive Reduction of a Directed Graph , 1972, SIAM J. Comput..

[2]  Rainer Spang,et al.  Non-transcriptional pathway features reconstructed from secondary effects of RNA interference , 2005, Bioinform..

[3]  John D. Storey,et al.  Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment , 2001 .

[4]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules , 2003, Science.

[5]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Estimating coarse gene network structure from large-scale gene perturbation data. , 2002, Genome research.

[6]  D. Harkin Uncovering functionally relevant signaling pathways using microarray-based expression profiling. , 2000, The oncologist.

[7]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Reconstructing Pathways in Large Genetic Networks from Genetic Perturbations , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..

[8]  T. Jaakkola,et al.  Validation and refinement of gene-regulatory pathways on a network of physical interactions , 2005, Genome Biology.

[9]  Ezgi O. Booth,et al.  Epistasis analysis with global transcriptional phenotypes , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[12]  Olga G. Troyanskaya,et al.  Nested effects models for high-dimensional phenotyping screens , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[13]  Mikko Koivisto,et al.  Exact Bayesian Structure Discovery in Bayesian Networks , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  P. Bühlmann,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Low-Order Conditional Independence Graphs for Inferring Genetic Networks , 2011 .

[16]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Ordering-Based Search: A Simple and Effective Algorithm for Learning Bayesian Networks , 2005, UAI.

[17]  Chris Wiggins,et al.  ARACNE: An Algorithm for the Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks in a Mammalian Cellular Context , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  Vadim Iourgenko,et al.  RNA interference technologies and their use in cancer research , 2007, Current opinion in oncology.

[19]  I S Kohane,et al.  Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[20]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  How to reconstruct a large genetic network from n gene perturbations in fewer than n2 easy steps , 2001, Bioinform..

[21]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Being Bayesian About Network Structure. A Bayesian Approach to Structure Discovery in Bayesian Networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[22]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Large-Sample Learning of Bayesian Networks is NP-Hard , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[23]  V. Thorsson,et al.  Discovery of regulatory interactions through perturbation: inference and experimental design. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[24]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  LassoOrderSearch: Learning Directed Graphical Model Structure using L1-Penalized Regression and Order Search , 2006 .