Seeking shortest
travel times through smart algorithms may not only optimize the travel times
but also reduce carbon emissions, such as CO2, CO and Hydro-Carbons.
It can also result in reduced driver frustrations and can increase passenger
expectations of consistent travel times, which in turn points to benefits in
overall planning of day schedules. Fuel consumption savings are another benefit
from the same. However, attempts to elect the shortest path as an assumption of
quick travel times, often work counter to the very objective intended and come
with the risk of creating a “Braess Paradox” which is about congestion
resulting when several drivers attempt to elect the same shortest route. The
situation that arises has been referred to as the price of anarchy! We propose
algorithms that find multiple shortest paths between an origin and a
destination. It must be appreciated that these will not yield the exact number
of Kilometers travelled, but favourable weights in terms
of travel times so that a reasonable allowable time difference between the multiple
shortest paths is attained when the same Origin and Destinations are considered
and favourable responsive routes are
determined as variables of traffic levels and time of day. These routes are
selected on the paradigm of route balancing, re-routing algorithms and traffic
light intelligence all coming together to result in optimized consistent travel
times whose benefits are evenly spread to all motorist, unlike the Entropy
balanced k shortest paths (EBkSP) method which favours some motorists on the
basis of urgency. This paper proposes a Fully Balanced Multiple-Candidate
shortest path (FBMkP) by which we model in SUMO to overcome the computational
overhead of assigning priority differently to each travelling vehicle using
intelligence at intersections and other points on the vehicular network. The
FBMkP opens up traffic by fully balancing the whole network so as to benefit
every motorist. Whereas the EBkSP reserves some routes for cars on high
priority, our algorithm distributes the benefits of smart routing to all
vehicles on the network and serves the road side units such as induction loops
and detectors from having to remember the urgency of each vehicle. Instead,
detectors and induction loops simply have to poll the destination of the
vehicle and not any urgency factor. The minimal data being processed
significantly reduce computational times and the benefits all vehicles. The
multiple-candidate shortest paths selected on the basis of current traffic
status on each possible route increase the efficiency. Routes are fewer than
vehicles so possessing weights of routes is smarter than processing individual
vehicle weights. This is a multi-objective function project where improving one
factor such as travel times improves many more cost, social and environmental
factors.
[1]
Baher Abdulhai,et al.
Reinforcement learning: Introduction to theory and potential for transport applications
,
2003
.
[2]
Shannon R. Bowling,et al.
Towards reducing traffic congestion using cooperative adaptive cruise control on a freeway with a ramp
,
2011
.
[3]
David M Levinson,et al.
Integrating Feedback into the Transportation Planning Model: Structure and Application
,
1994
.
[4]
E. Lawler.
A PROCEDURE FOR COMPUTING THE K BEST SOLUTIONS TO DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE SHORTEST PATH PROBLEM
,
1972
.
[5]
Chu-Hsing Lin,et al.
Genetic Algorithm for Shortest Driving Time in Intelligent Transportation Systems
,
2008,
2008 International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering (mue 2008).
[6]
Heydar Toossian Shandiz,et al.
Intelligent Transport System Based on Genetic Algorithm
,
2009
.
[7]
Anna Nagurney,et al.
On a Paradox of Traffic Planning
,
2005,
Transp. Sci..
[8]
Marguerite FRANK,et al.
The Braess paradox
,
1981,
Math. Program..
[9]
Linda Baker.
Detours by design.
,
2009,
Scientific American.
[10]
Bo Xu,et al.
Spatio-temporal Databases in Urban Transportation
,
2010,
IEEE Data Eng. Bull..
[11]
Charles R. Standridge,et al.
Intelligent transportation system real time traffic speed prediction with minimal data
,
2012
.
[12]
E. Jenelius,et al.
Time-based vs. distance-based sampling in probe vehicle data : Implications for travel time estimation
,
2012
.
[13]
Add Sadek,et al.
Self-Learning Intelligent Agents for Dynamic Traffic Routing on Transportation Networks
,
2010
.
[14]
James H. Banks.
Introduction to Transportation Engineering
,
1997
.
[15]
Mitsuo Gen,et al.
A new approach for shortest path routing problem by random key-based GA
,
2006,
GECCO '06.
[16]
Zuojin Zhu,et al.
Visco‐elastic traffic flow model
,
2013
.
[17]
Karine Zeitouni,et al.
Proactive Vehicle Re-routing Strategies for Congestion Avoidance
,
2012,
2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems.