How to produce a diagnostic opinion at a distance? New forms of tele-expertise use in France and their transformational effects on healthcare practices in dermatology

How to produce a diagnostic opinion at a distance, without seeing and examining patients? This is the challenge of tele-expertise (TLX), defined first in legal terms, as one of the five telemedicine acts in France. It consists of a particular form of healthcare practice in which a physician, known as the “requester”, solicits remotely the opinion of another practitioner, a specialist known as the “requested”, by sharing with him/her clinical information and photographs that he/she produces for this purpose, based on the medical examination of the patient. This practice is certainly not new; it is inherent to any medical activity where it develops outside of any legislative and regulatory framework, between practitioners who already know each other more or less well. So the novelty of the recent forms of TLX as a legally recognized medical act in its own right, relies mainly on the development of secure file exchange platforms within territorialized care networks, the systematization of these practices beyond the networks of acquaintances and their coverage by the health insurance. The purpose of this article is to describe the various usages of this new form of TLX, as well as to understand how they contribute to the in-depth transformation of care practices and organizations. It suggests doing so in the specific case of dermatology, through a qualitative study based on semi-directive interviews approximately with fifty French dermatologists, mainly requested experts, practicing TLX both in the context of private practice and in a hospital setting. The results of this empirical study are presented in three parts. First, we will consider the specificity of dermatological practice and describe the particular ways in which TLX is being implemented in this field, as a new framework. Then, we will report on the multiples efforts and skills needed to produce a diagnostic opinion remotely. We will lastly present various uses that dermatologists develop of TLX in different socio-organizational configurations. We will finally discuss how these uses transform the usual practices of dermatologists, not only by creating a new type of activity, but also by allowing them to participate differently in the organization of care pathways.

[1]  P. Simon,et al.  Téléconsultation, télé-expertise, télésurveillance médicale : l’apport de « Mon Espace Santé » , 2022, Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine.

[2]  B. Cribier Le dermatologue et la photographie , 2021, Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie - FMC.

[3]  T. Duong,et al.  The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration , 2021, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Karen McKoy,et al.  International Teledermatology Review , 2021, Current Dermatology Reports.

[5]  M. Richard,et al.  French Teledermatologists: Activity and Motivations Prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[6]  M. Mamzer,et al.  Teledermatology practices: Benefits, limitations and perspectives. Qualitative interview-based study with dermatologists , 2021 .

[7]  A. Petit,et al.  Alerte cutanée liée à la COVID 19 : télédermatologie en remplacement des urgences dermatologiques ? , 2020, Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie.

[8]  M. Schuers,et al.  Indicateurs en télédermatologie : une revue de la littérature , 2020 .

[9]  Sylvie Grosjean,et al.  Quand la distance reconfigure la pratique clinique. Une analyse multimodale des interactions en télémédecine , 2020 .

[10]  T. Moulin,et al.  France Is the First Country to Reimburse Tele-Expertise at a National Level to All Medical Doctors. , 2020, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[11]  A. Dompmartin,et al.  Profil du télédermatologue en France en 2019 , 2019 .

[12]  É. Goujon,et al.  Devenir comparé des malades vus en téléconsultation sur un hôpital local et en téléexpertise en Région Bourgogne-Franche-Comté Sud, sur 1 an, de mars 2018 à février 2019 , 2019 .

[13]  Clare Liddy,et al.  A Systematic Review of Asynchronous, Provider-to-Provider, Electronic Consultation Services to Improve Access to Specialty Care Available Worldwide. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  O. Chosidow,et al.  TELDERM Urgence : quels avis par téléexpertise ? Étude transversale mai 2016 et mai 2017 , 2018, Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie.

[15]  É. Thomas,et al.  TELDERM : télé-expertise en dermatologie : évolution sur 21 mois dans un établissement gériatrique , 2018, Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie.

[16]  G. Randhawa,et al.  Diagnosis and Decision-Making in Telemedicine , 2018, Journal of patient experience.

[17]  C. Pope,et al.  Digitized patient-provider interaction: How does it matter? A qualitative meta-synthesis. , 2018, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Alexandre Mathieu-Fritz,et al.  À la recherche des configurations sociotechniques de la télémédecine , 2018 .

[19]  J. English,et al.  Teledermatology: A Review and Update , 2018, American Journal of Clinical Dermatology.

[20]  Kathy Dallest,et al.  Teledermatology for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review , 2017, JAMA dermatology.

[21]  Trilokraj Tejasvi,et al.  The Empirical Foundations of Teledermatology: A Review of the Research Evidence. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[22]  C. Blanc,et al.  Apport de la télémédecine en médecine interne : expérience de la mise en place de la télédermatologie sur le centre hospitalier de Versailles , 2015 .

[23]  Alexandre Mathieu-Fritz,et al.  Les transformations des pratiques professionnelles lors des téléconsultations médicales , 2013 .

[24]  Christine Milligan,et al.  Calling for Care: ‘Disembodied’ Work, Teleoperators and Older People Living at Home , 2012 .

[25]  Nelly Oudshoorn,et al.  How places matter: Telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare , 2012, Social studies of science.

[26]  Laurence Esterle,et al.  L'impact des consultations à distance sur les pratiques médicales. Vers un nouveau métier de médecin ? , 2011 .

[27]  E. Miller,et al.  The continuing need to investigate the nature and content of teleconsultation communication using interaction analysis techniques , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[28]  Davide Nicolini Medical Innovation as a Process of Translation: A Case from the Field of Telemedicine , 2010 .

[29]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Telemedicine: A practice-based approach to technology , 2010 .

[30]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  Physical and digital proximity: emerging ways of health care in face-to-face and telemonitoring of heart-failure patients. , 2009, Sociology of health & illness.

[31]  Carl May,et al.  Making and Unmaking Telepatients , 2009 .

[32]  N. Oudshoorn Diagnosis at a distance: the invisible work of patients and healthcare professionals in cardiac telemonitoring technology. , 2008, Sociology of health & illness.

[33]  Davide Nicolini The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[34]  C. Méadel,et al.  Problématiser la question des usages , 2004 .

[35]  J. Moisdon,et al.  Les TIC restructurent-elles ? , 2003 .

[36]  Carl May,et al.  Remote Doctors and Absent Patients: Acting at a Distance in Telemedicine? , 2003 .

[37]  E. Miller,et al.  The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor–patient communication , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[38]  F. Mair,et al.  Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[39]  D. Eedy,et al.  Teledermatology: a review , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[40]  E. Miller,et al.  Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[41]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[42]  G. Plewig,et al.  The history of photography in dermatology. Milestones from the roots to the 20th century. , 1996, Archives of dermatology.

[43]  B. Asher The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[44]  Alexandre Mathieu-Fritz Les téléconsultations en santé mentale , 2018 .

[45]  T. Duong,et al.  Emerging Telemedicine Analysis of Future Teledermatology Application in France , 2015 .

[46]  Nelly E.J. Oudshoorn,et al.  Telecare Technologies and the Transformation of Healthcare , 2011 .

[47]  P. Lehoux,et al.  8. La télémédecine et la transformation des formes organisationnelles de l’hôpital , 2005 .

[48]  A. Michel,et al.  L'oral et l'écrit dans les communications de travail ou les illusions du «tout écrit» , 1998 .

[49]  D. Perednia,et al.  Teledermatology: one application of telemedicine. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.