Supporting group decisions by mediating deliberation to improve information pooling

Group decision support systems (GDSS) hold significant potential for improving decision making, but they have not been broadly adopted. One reason for this is that these platforms introduce representational work for users that is distinct from a more familiar deliberative interaction but they offer uncertain payoff. This article presents a study with a platform that addresses this problem by leveraging the argumentative structure of deliberative conversation to drive a decision support algorithm. The platform uses argument visualization to mediate the collaborators' conversation. The study demonstrates that the platform addresses a known deficiency in human information pooling called the common knowledge phenomenon.

[1]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[2]  Timothy J. Hickey,et al.  Adaptive mediation in groupware , 2008 .

[3]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[4]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Using group support systems to discover hidden profiles: an examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Yolanda Gil,et al.  User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures , 2005, IUI '05.

[6]  C. Sunstein.  Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge , 2006 .

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Providing Decisional Guidance for Multicriteria Decision Making in Groups , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  Implementing Dempster's Rule for Hierarchical Evidence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The impact of information on small group choice. , 1997 .

[10]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Samuel N Fraidin,et al.  When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making , 2004 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[14]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[15]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority , 1998 .

[16]  Marc D. Street.  Groupthink , 1997 .

[17]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[19]  Ramon Prudencio S. Toledo.  Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making , 2005, Inf. Vis..

[20]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  On theory-driven design and deployment of collaboration systems , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Richard Alterman,et al.  Using shared representations to improve coordination and intent inference , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[22]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[23]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[25]  S. Das,et al.  Symbolic argumentation for decision making under uncertainty , 2005, 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[26]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[27]  Ashraf I. Shirani,et al.  Sampling and pooling of decision-relevant information: Comparing the efficiency of face-to-face and GSS supported groups , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[29]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[30]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[31]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .