Large Eddy Simulation and Second-Moment Closure Model of Particle Fluctuating Motion in Two-Phase Turbulent Shear Flows

Turbulence statistics of non-settling discrete solid particles suspended in homogeneous turbulent gas shear flows generated by means of large eddy simulation (LES) are investigated for two different mean shear rates (S = 25 and 50 /s) and three different particle diameters (d = 30, 45 and 60 μm). Concurrently, a second-moment closure model of the particle fluctuating motion, based on separate transport equations for the particle kinetic stresses and the fluid-particle velocity correlations, is described and the corresponding predictions are compared with the simulation results. Large eddy simulation and closure model predictions show that the most noticeable effect of inertia is to increase the degree of anisotropy of the particle fluctuating motion with respect to the fluid one. As a matter of fact, the transverse particle turbulent velocity components are directly controlled by the dragging by the fluid turbulence and decrease with increasing particle relaxation time compared to the fluid turbulence integral time scale. In contrast, the streamwise component increases, due to the influence of both the fluid and particle mean velocity gradients, and eventually exceeds the corresponding gas turbulent component.

[1]  M. Wells,et al.  The effects of crossing trajectories on the dispersion of particles in a turbulent flow , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  E. Deutsch Dispersion de particules dans une turbulence homogène isotrope stationnaire calculée par simulation numérique directe des grandes échelles , 1992 .

[3]  M. Maxey The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  M. Reeks On the constitutive relations for dispersed particles in nonuniform flows. I: Dispersion in a simple shear flow , 1993 .

[5]  L. M. Liljegren The effect of a mean fluid velocity gradient on the streamwise velocity variance of a particle suspended in a turbulent flow , 1993 .

[6]  O. Simonin,et al.  Large eddy simulation applied to the modelling of particulate transport coefficients in turbulent two-phase flows , 1991 .

[7]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Detailed measurements in a swirling particulate two-phase flow by a phase-Doppler anemometer , 1991 .

[8]  D. Laurence Advective Formulation of Large Eddy Simulation for Engineering Type Flows , 1986 .

[9]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  C. Tchen,et al.  Mean Value and Correlation Problems connected with the Motion of Small Particles suspended in a turbulent fluid , 1947 .

[11]  Olivier Simonin,et al.  Eulerian Prediction of the Fluid/Particle Correlated Motion in Turbulent Two-Phase Flows , 1993 .

[12]  U. Lei,et al.  On the motion of small particles in a homogeneous turbulent shear flow , 1991 .

[13]  G. Csanady Turbulent Diffusion of Heavy Particles in the Atmosphere , 1963 .

[14]  D. Drew Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow , 1983 .

[15]  J. Eaton,et al.  The behavior of solid particles in a vertical turbulent boundary layer in air , 1990 .

[16]  K. Squires,et al.  Measurements of particle dispersion obtained from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  J. Hinze,et al.  TURBULENT FLUID AND PARTICLE INTERACTION , 1972 .

[18]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  A generalized Langevin model for turbulent flows , 1986 .

[19]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Improved turbulence models based on large eddy simulation of homogeneous, incompressible, turbulent flows , 1983 .