Interaction of climate change with effects of conspecific and heterospecific density on reproduction

: We studied the relationship between temperature and the coexistence of great tit Parus major and blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus, breeding in 75 study plots across Europe and North Africa. We expected an advance in laying date and a reduction in clutch size during warmer springs as a general response to climate warming and a delay in laying date and a reduction in clutch size during warmer winters due to density-dependent effects. As expected, as spring temperature increases laying date advances and as winter temperature increases clutch size is reduced in both species. Density of great tit affected the relationship between winter temperature and laying date in great and blue tit. Specifically, as density of great tit increased and temperature in winter increased both species started to reproduce later. Density of blue tit affected the relationship between spring temperature and blue and great tit laying date. Thus, both species start to reproduce earlier with increasing spring temperature as density of blue tit increases, which was not an expected outcome, since we expected that increasing spring temperature should advance laying date, while increasing density should delay it cancelling each other out. Climate warming and its interaction with density affects clutch size of great tits but not of blue tits. As predicted, great tit clutch size is reduced more with density of blue tits as temperature in winter increases. The relationship between spring temperature and density on clutch size of great tits depends on whether the increase is in density of great tit or blue tit. Therefore, an increase in temperature negatively affected the coexistence of blue and great tits differently in both species. Thus, blue tit clutch size was unaffected by the interaction effect of density with temperature, while great tit clutch size was affected in multiple ways by these interactions terms We studied the relationship between temperature and the coexistence of great tit Parus major and blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus , breeding in 75 study plots across Europe and North Africa. We expected an advance in laying date and a reduction in clutch size during warmer springs as a general response to climate warming and a delay in laying date and a reduction in clutch size during warmer winters due to density-dependent effects. As expected, as spring temperature increases laying date advances and as winter temperature increases clutch size is reduced in both species. Density of great tit affected the relationship between winter temperature and laying date in great and blue tit. Specifically, as density of great tit increased and temperature in winter increased both species started to reproduce later. Density of blue tit affected the relationship between spring temperature and blue and great tit laying date. Thus, both species start to reproduce earlier with increasing spring temperature as density of blue tit increases, which was not an expected outcome, since we expected that increasing spring temperature should advance laying date, while increasing density should delay it cancelling each other out. Climate warming and its interaction with density affects clutch size of great tits but not of blue tits. As predicted, great tit clutch size is reduced more with density of blue tits as temperature in winter increases. The relationship between spring temperature and density on clutch size of great tits depends on whether the increase is in density of great tit or blue tit. Therefore, an increase in temperature negatively affected the coexistence of blue and great tits differently in both species. Thus, blue tit clutch size was unaffected by the interaction effect of density with temperature, while great tit clutch size was affected in multiple ways by these interactions terms.

[1]  A. V. van Noordwijk,et al.  Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole‐nesting birds , 2018, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  Ken W. Smith,et al.  Tritrophic phenological match–mismatch in space and time , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[3]  M. J. Stenning The Blue Tit , 2018 .

[4]  Jelmer M. Samplonius,et al.  Nest site preference depends on the relative density of conspecifics and heterospecifics in wild birds , 2017, Frontiers in Zoology.

[5]  Jelmer M. Samplonius,et al.  Competitor phenology as a social cue in breeding site selection , 2017, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  C. Biard,et al.  Nest-box temperature affects clutch size, incubation initiation, and nestling health in great tits , 2017 .

[7]  Bruno Massa,et al.  Interspecific variation in the relationship between clutch size, laying date and intensity of urbanization in four species of hole‐nesting birds , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[8]  Jan‐Åke Nilsson,et al.  Fluctuating selection on basal metabolic rate , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[9]  Thomas Hickler,et al.  Long‐term population dynamics of a migrant bird suggests interaction of climate change and competition with resident species , 2015 .

[10]  Kung-Sik Chan,et al.  Testing for effects of climate change on competitive relationships and coexistence between two bird species , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[12]  A. V. van Noordwijk,et al.  Variation in clutch size in relation to nest size in birds , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  R. Green,et al.  Birds and Climate Change: Birds and climate change , 2014 .

[14]  Bruno Massa,et al.  Clutch‐size variation in Western Palaearctic secondary hole‐nesting passerine birds in relation to nest box design , 2014 .

[15]  Rowan O. Martin,et al.  Effects of Climate Change on Birds , 2011 .

[16]  I. Jamieson,et al.  Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  Multiple responses to increasing spring temperatures in the breeding cycle of blue and great tits (Cyanistes caeruleus, Parus major) , 2011 .

[18]  Bruno Massa,et al.  The Design of Artificial Nestboxes for the Study of Secondary Hole-Nesting Birds: A Review of Methodological Inconsistencies and Potential Biases , 2010 .

[19]  M. Visser,et al.  Temperature has a causal effect on avian timing of reproduction , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Decline in the frequency and benefits of multiple brooding in great tits as a consequence of a changing environment , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  J. Blondel,et al.  Double-brooded great tits (Parus major) in Mediterranean oak habitats: Do first broods always perform better than second broods? , 2008, Russian Journal of Ecology.

[22]  A. Gelman Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  J. Balbontín,et al.  Density-dependence by habitat heterogeneity: individual quality versus territory quality , 2008 .

[24]  C. Perrins Tits and their caterpillar food supply , 2008 .

[25]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Clutch size and breeding success of Pied and Collared Flycatchers Ficedula spp. in nest‐boxes of different sizes , 2008 .

[26]  Shane A. Richards,et al.  Dealing with overdispersed count data in applied ecology , 2007 .

[27]  S. Baillie,et al.  Weather-dependent survival: implications of climate change for passerine population processes , 2007 .

[28]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Learning the ecological niche , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Marcel M. Lambrechts,et al.  The effect of habitat quality on foraging patterns, provisioning rate and nestling growth in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus , 2004 .

[30]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Regression Using JMP , 2003 .

[31]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[32]  David L. Thomson,et al.  Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[34]  C. Both Density dependence of avian clutch size in resident and migrant species: is there a constraint on the predictability of competitor density? , 2000 .

[35]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  M M Lambrechts,et al.  A single response mechanism is responsible for evolutionary adaptive variation in a bird's laying date. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  D. Winkler,et al.  THE SEASONAL DECLINE IN TREE SWALLOW CLUTCH SIZE: PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINT OR STRATEGIC ADJUSTMENT?' , 1996 .

[38]  A. V. van Noordwijk,et al.  Proximate and Ultimate Aspects of Phenotypic Plasticity in Timing of Great Tit Breeding in a Heterogeneous Environment , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[39]  B. G. Murray On density dependence , 1994 .

[40]  S. Haywood Sensory and Hormonal Control of Clutch Size in Birds , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[41]  J. Török,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN REPRODUCTION OF THE COLLARED FLYCATCHER (FICEDULA ALBICOLLIS) AT HIGH POPULATION LEVELS , 1988 .

[42]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global trends of measured surface air temperature , 1987 .

[43]  C. Welden,et al.  The Intensity of Competition Versus its Importance: An Overlooked Distinction and Some Implications , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[44]  R. Alatalo,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENCE IN BREEDING SUCCESS OF THE PIED FLYCATCHER (FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA) , 1984 .

[45]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Reproductive success of the great tit in relation to its territorial status , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Competition Between the Great Tit and the Blue Tit Outside the Breeding Season in Field Experiments , 1980 .

[47]  Christopher M. Perrins,et al.  Population fluctuations and clutch size in the Great tit , 1965 .

[48]  J. Gibb,et al.  Food and food supply of nestling tits (Paridae) in Breckland Pine , 1963 .

[49]  A. Dhondt Interspecific competition in birds , 2012 .

[50]  A. Dhondt Effects of competition on great and blue tit reproduction: intensity and importance in relation to habitat quality. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[51]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[52]  K. Barton MuMIn : multi-model inference, R package version 0.12.0 , 2009 .

[53]  Robert J. Smith,et al.  Arrival timing and seasonal reproductive performance in a long-distance migratory landbird , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[54]  Miguel Ferrer,et al.  Density‐Dependent Fecundity by Habitat Heterogeneity in an Increasing Population of Spanish Imperial Eagles , 1996 .

[55]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Density-dependent clutch size caused by habitat heterogeneity , 1992 .

[56]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a re-analysis. , 1984 .