Lomustine and Bevacizumab in Progressive Glioblastoma

Background Bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma on the basis of uncontrolled data. Data from a phase 2 trial suggested that the addition of bevacizumab to lomustine might improve overall survival as compared with monotherapies. We sought to determine whether the combination would result in longer overall survival than lomustine alone among patients at first progression of glioblastoma. Methods We randomly assigned patients with progression after chemoradiation in a 2:1 ratio to receive lomustine plus bevacizumab (combination group, 288 patients) or lomustine alone (monotherapy group, 149 patients). The methylation status of the promoter of O6‐methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was assessed. Health‐related quality of life and neurocognitive function were evaluated at baseline and every 12 weeks. The primary end point of the trial was overall survival. Results A total of 437 patients underwent randomization. The median number of 6‐week treatment cycles was three in the combination group and one in the monotherapy group. With 329 overall survival events (75.3%), the combination therapy did not provide a survival advantage; the median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 10.1) in the combination group and 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 10.4) in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.21; P=0.65). Locally assessed progression‐free survival was 2.7 months longer in the combination group than in the monotherapy group: 4.2 months versus 1.5 months (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.61; P<0.001). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 63.6% of the patients in the combination group and 38.1% of the patients in the monotherapy group. The addition of bevacizumab to lomustine affected neither health‐related quality of life nor neurocognitive function. The MGMT status was prognostic. Conclusions Despite somewhat prolonged progression‐free survival, treatment with lomustine plus bevacizumab did not confer a survival advantage over treatment with lomustine alone in patients with progressive glioblastoma. (Funded by an unrestricted educational grant from F. Hoffmann–La Roche and by the EORTC Cancer Research Fund; EORTC 26101 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01290939; Eudra‐CT number, 2010‐023218‐30.)

[1]  H. Urbach,et al.  Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  NIMG-24HIGH SPATIOTEMPORAL DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST (DSC) PERFUSION MRI USING MULTIBAND ECHOPLANAR IMAGING (MB-EPI) , 2015 .

[3]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Uhm Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group , 2010 .

[5]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of life assessment in clinical trials—guidelines and a checklist for protocol writers: the U.K. Medical Research Council experience , 1997 .

[6]  R. Bourgon,et al.  Patients With Proneural Glioblastoma May Derive Overall Survival Benefit From the Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: Retrospective Analysis of the AVAglio Trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  D. Osoba,et al.  Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials--does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making? , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Vernhout,et al.  Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Osoba,et al.  An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[11]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  The impact of bevacizumab on health-related quality of life in patients treated for recurrent glioblastoma: results of the randomised controlled phase 2 BELOB trial. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[12]  K. Aldape,et al.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Marion Smits,et al.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[14]  Alexander Radbruch,et al.  Relevance of T2 signal changes in the assessment of progression of glioblastoma according to the Response Assessment in Neurooncology criteria. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[15]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Treatment Response Evaluation Using 18F-FDOPA PET in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Glioma on Bevacizumab Therapy , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  MGMT testing—the challenges for biomarker-based glioma treatment , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[17]  Martin Sill,et al.  Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  L S Freedman,et al.  On the use of Pocock and Simon's method for balancing treatment numbers over prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1976, Biometrics.

[19]  M. Lezak Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[20]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Martin Sill,et al.  Assessing CpG island methylator phenotype, 1p/19q codeletion, and MGMT promoter methylation from epigenome-wide data in the biomarker cohort of the NOA-04 trial. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[22]  Jacoline E. C. Bromberg,et al.  Phase II part of EORTC study 26101: The sequence of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma. , 2016 .

[23]  A. Brandes,et al.  AVAREG: a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study of fotemustine or bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[25]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.