IFRS Adoption and Accounting Quality: A Review

Abstract In 2002, the European Union (EU) Parliament passed a regulation that requires consolidated and simple accounts for all companies listed in the EU to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for fiscal years starting after 1 January 2005. This change in accounting systems will have a large impact on the information environment for EU companies. This paper provides a review of the literature on adoption of different Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). We thus provide background and guidance for researchers studying the change in accounting quality following widespread IFRS adoption in the EU. We argue that cross-country differences in accounting quality are likely to remain following IFRS adoption because accounting quality is a function of the firm's overall institutional setting, including the legal and political system of the country in which the firm resides.

[1]  R. H. Parker,et al.  ‘True and Fair’: A Survey of Uk Financial Directors , 1991 .

[2]  David A. Guenther,et al.  The association between financial accounting measures and real economic activity: a multinational study , 2000 .

[3]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings , 1999 .

[4]  J. Niskanen,et al.  A note on the information content of parent company versus consolidated earnings in Finland , 1998 .

[5]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  Financial Reporting Incentives for Conservative Accounting: The Influence of Legal and Political Institutions , 2005 .

[6]  Culture, Openness, and Finance , 2001 .

[7]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  The Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Big 4 Audits on Earnings Quality Around the World , 2006 .

[8]  Eli Bartov,et al.  Comparative Value Relevance Among German, U.S. And International Accounting Standards: A German Stock Market Perspective , 2002 .

[9]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting , 2000 .

[10]  Sudipta Basu.  The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings , 1997 .

[11]  Ole‐Kristian Hope,et al.  Differences between Domestic Accounting Standards and IAS: Measurement, Determinants and Implications , 2006 .

[12]  R. H. Parker,et al.  True and Fair': UK Auditors' View , 1991 .

[13]  I. Haw,et al.  Ultimate Ownership, Income Management, and Legal and Extra‐Legal Institutions , 2004 .

[14]  J. Jones.  Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations , 1991 .

[15]  R. Ball,et al.  EARNINGS QUALITY IN UK PRIVATE FIRMS: COMPARATIVE LOSS RECOGNITION TIMELINESS , 2005 .

[16]  James A. Ohlson.  Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation* , 1995 .

[17]  Mingyi Hung,et al.  Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany , 2007 .

[18]  Markus K. Brunnermeier,et al.  Disclosure Requirements and Stock Exchange Listing Choice in an International Context , 1998 .

[19]  Shivaram Rajgopal,et al.  The Accrual Anomaly: International Evidence , 2005 .

[20]  P. Verwijmeren,et al.  The Economic Consequences of IFRS: The Impact of IAS 32 on Preference Shares in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[21]  R. Ball.  Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and Disclosure , 2001 .

[22]  Mingyi Hung,et al.  ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: AN INTERNATIONAL ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[23]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Law and Finance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  R. Ball,et al.  Earnings Quality in U.K. Private Firms , 2004 .

[25]  Ronald A. Dye,et al.  Classifications Manipulation and Nash Accounting Standards , 2002 .

[26]  C. Leuz,et al.  IAS Versus U.S. GAAP: Information Asymmetry–Based Evidence from Germany's New Market , 2003 .

[27]  Abbie J. Smith,et al.  Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance , 2001 .

[28]  Country-Specific Factors Related to Financial Reporting and the Value Relevance of Accounting Data , 1999 .

[29]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Disclosure Incentives and Effects on Cost of Capital around the World , 2005 .

[30]  Derek Johnston.  Managing Stock Option Expense: The Manipulation of Option-Pricing Model Assumptions* , 2006 .

[31]  J. Laffarga,et al.  An Evaluation of the Value Relevance of Consolidated versus Unconsolidated Accounting Information: Evidence from Quoted Spanish Firms , 2000 .

[32]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  What Determines Corporate Transparency? , 2003 .

[33]  Mark Lang,et al.  Earnings Management and Cross Listing: Are Reconciled Earnings Comparable to Us Earnings? , 2005 .

[34]  Jinhan Pae,et al.  The Reduction of Firms' Ownership Induced Agency Costs Following Financial Reporting Reform in the European Union , 2006 .

[35]  K. Schipper,et al.  Implications of Accounting Research for the SEC's Consideration of International Accounting Standards for U.S. Securities Offerings , 1999 .

[36]  S. Sunder.  Regulatory Competition Among Accounting Standards within and Across International Boundaries , 2002 .

[37]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Myopic management behavior with efficient, but imperfect, financial markets: A comparison of information asymmetries in the U.S. and Japan☆ , 1993 .

[38]  Morton Pincus,et al.  Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings , 2000 .

[39]  Xu Li,et al.  Characteristics of a Firm's Information Environment and the Information Asymmetry Between Insiders and Outsiders , 2003 .

[40]  C. Leuz.  IAS versus US GAAP: Information Asymmetry-Based Evidence from Germany's New Market , 2002 .

[41]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  International accounting harmonization and global equity markets , 1999 .

[42]  Mark Lang,et al.  THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF GERMAN ACCOUNTING MEASURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[43]  C. Leuz.  Comment and Discussion , 2001 .

[44]  Holger Daske.  Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or Usgaap - Has the Expected Cost of Equity Capital Really Decreased? , 2006 .

[45]  Felix Oberholzer-Gee,et al.  Political Relationships, Global Financing and Corporate Transparency: Evidence from Indonesia , 2006 .

[46]  T. Harris.  International accounting standards versus US-GAAP reporting : empirical evidence based on case studies , 1995 .

[47]  Kurt V. Auer.  Capital market reactions to earnings announcements: empirical evidence on the difference in the information content of IAS-based earnings and EC-Directives-based earnings , 1996 .

[48]  C. Leuz.  Cross listing, bonding and firms' reporting incentives: A discussion of Lang, Raedy and Wilson (2006) , 2006 .

[49]  K. Schipper.  The introduction of International Accounting Standards in Europe: Implications for international convergence , 2005 .

[50]  Katherine Schipper,et al.  Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes , 2004 .

[51]  K. Sun.  Financial Reporting Quality, Capital Allocation Efficiency, and Financing Structure: An International Study , 2005 .

[52]  Joseph P. H. Fan,et al.  Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia , 2000 .

[53]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Adoption of IFRS in Europe , 2006 .

[54]  D. Damant.  Discussion of ‘International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors’ , 2006 .

[55]  Douglas W. Diamond.  Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring , 1984 .

[56]  Mark Lang,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ACCOUNTING DIVERSITY - EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN-UNION , 1994 .

[57]  C. Leuz,et al.  The Role of Accounting in the German Financial System , 2003 .

[58]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK 1 We appreciate helpf , 1999 .

[59]  David Burgstahler,et al.  The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms , 2004 .

[60]  Disclosure Requirements and Stock Exchange Listing Choice in an International Context , 1999 .

[61]  Karl A. Muller,et al.  The market valuation of IAS versus US-GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations , 1999 .

[62]  G. Whittington.  The adoption of International Accounting Standards in the European Union , 2005 .

[63]  Carla K. Hayn.  The information content of losses , 1995 .

[64]  J. Niskanen,et al.  To whom are IAS earnings informative? Domestic versus foreign shareholders' perspectives , 2000 .

[65]  Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes,et al.  What Works in Securities Laws? , 2003 .

[66]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality , 2007 .

[67]  R. Kalra,et al.  Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison , 2004 .

[68]  W. Buijink,et al.  Voluntary adoption of non-local GAAP in the European Union: A study of determinants and consequences , 2005 .

[69]  Gary C. Biddle,et al.  Relative Versus Incremental Information Content , 1995 .

[70]  Per Olsson,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Valuation Properties of Cross-Listed Firms' IAS and U.S. GAAP Earnings and Book Values , 2002 .

[71]  Bo-Göran Ekholm,et al.  Quo vadis true and fair view , 1998 .

[72]  Robert E. Verrecchia,et al.  Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital , 1991 .

[73]  Hollis Ashbaugh,et al.  Non-US Firms' Accounting Standard Choices , 2001 .

[74]  Christian Leuz,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure , 1999 .

[75]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[76]  N. Kirk.  'TRUE AND FAIR VIEW' VERSUS 'PRESENT FAIRLY IN CONFORMITY WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES' , 2001 .

[77]  David A. Guenther,et al.  Financial Reporting Environments and International Capital Mobility , 2003 .

[78]  A. Vanstraelen,et al.  Earnings management under German GAAP versus IFRS , 2005 .