Ice accretion and release in fuel systems

Following the B777 accident at Heathrow in 2008, the certification authorities required Boeing, Airbus, and Rolls-Royce to conduct icing analysis and tests of their Rolls-Royce Trent engined aircraft fuel systems. The experience and the test data gained from these activities were distilled and released by Airbus to the EASA ICAR project for research and analysis. This paper provided an overview of the Airbus ice accretion and release tests. Brief narratives on the test rigs, the test procedure and methodology were given and key findings from the ice release investigations were presented. The accreted ice thickness was non-uniform; however, it is found typically c.  $\mathrm{2\;\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}}$ thick. Analysis of the accreted ice collected from the rig tests showed the ice was very porous. The porosity is very much dependant on how the water was introduced and mixed in the icing test rigs. The standard Airbus method produced accreted ice of higher porosity compared to that produced by the injection method. The porosity of the accreted ice from Airbus icing investigations was found to be c. 0.90. The relationship of permeability with porosity was inferred from published data and models for freshly fallen snow in the atmosphere. Derived permeability $\mathrm{7.0\times 10^{-9}\;\mathrm{\mathrm{\mathrm{m}}^{\mathrm{2}}}}$ was then applied in the CFD analysis of pipe flow with a porous wall lining to determine the shear stress on the accreted ice. It showed that 25%, 50% and 75% of the accreted ice has interface shear strength of less than $\mathrm{15.3\;\mathrm{Pa}}$ , $\mathrm{20.7\;\mathrm{Pa}}$ and $\mathrm{26.1\;\mathrm{Pa}}$ , respectively.

[1]  W. J. Steenburgh,et al.  Snow-to-Liquid Ratio Variability and Prediction at a High-Elevation Site in Utah's Wasatch Mountains , 2009 .

[2]  J. K. Lam,et al.  Character and interface shear strength of accreted ice on subcooled surfaces submerged in fuel , 2015, The Aeronautical Journal.

[3]  Christos Tzimopoulos,et al.  A new explicit relation for the Friction coefficient in the Darcy – Weisbach equation , 2010 .

[4]  Kambiz Vafai,et al.  between a porous medium and a fluid layer---an exact solution , 1990 .

[5]  Mark D. Carpenter,et al.  Water solubility characteristics of current aviation jet fuels , 2014 .

[6]  Wei Che Huang,et al.  Macroscopic modeling of turbulent flow over a porous medium , 2007 .

[7]  Sophia Haussener,et al.  Tomography-based determination of permeability and Dupuit–Forchheimer coefficient of characteristic snow samples , 2011, Journal of Glaciology.

[8]  Harold E. Brooks,et al.  Improving Snowfall Forecasting by Accounting for the Climatological Variability of Snow Density , 2006 .

[9]  D. F. Young,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1996 .

[10]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Pressure-driven flow in a channel with porous walls* , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Turbulent Flow Through Porous Media , 2001, Ground water.

[12]  R. E. Uittenbogaard,et al.  The influence of wall permeability on turbulent channel flow , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Dejan Brkić,et al.  Review of explicit approximations to the Colebrook relation for flow friction , 2011 .

[14]  Glenn O. Brown The History of the Darcy-Weisbach Equation for Pipe Flow Resistance , 2002 .

[15]  A. Smits,et al.  Turbulent flow in smooth and rough pipes , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Y. Nishio,et al.  Three Dimensional Microscopic Flow Simulation Across the Interface of a Porous Wall and Clear Fluid by the Lattice Boltzmann Method , 2009 .

[17]  D. W. Barr Coefficient of Permeability Determined By Measurable Parameters , 2001, Ground water.

[18]  H. Yeung,et al.  Behaviour of Water in Jet Fuel in a Simulated Fuel Tank , 2011 .

[19]  Iraj Mortazavi,et al.  Numerical modelling and passive flow control using porous media , 2008 .

[20]  A. Costa,et al.  Permeability‐porosity relationship: A reexamination of the Kozeny‐Carman equation based on a fractal pore‐space geometry assumption , 2006 .

[21]  Hiromu Shimizu,et al.  Air Permeability of Deposited Snow , 1970 .

[22]  Luca Cortelezzi,et al.  Linear stability analysis of pressure-driven flows in channels with porous walls , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  M. Al-Nimr,et al.  On forced convection in channels partially filled with porous substrates , 2002 .

[24]  A. Steinfeld,et al.  Tomography-based determination of porosity, specific area and permeability of snow and comparison with measurements , 2014 .

[25]  Joseph K.-W. Lam,et al.  Ice growth in aviation jet fuel , 2013 .

[26]  D. Joseph,et al.  Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Evangelos Keramaris,et al.  Turbulent flow over and within a porous bed , 2003 .

[28]  Christian Geindreau,et al.  3-D image-based numerical computations of snow permeability: links to specific surface area, density, and microstructural anisotropy , 2012 .

[29]  James T. Moore,et al.  A Climatology of Snow-to-Liquid Ratio for the Contiguous United States , 2005 .

[30]  Kenneth G. Libbrecht,et al.  The physics of snow crystals , 2005 .

[31]  C F Colebrook,et al.  TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. , 1939 .

[32]  A. Smits,et al.  Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  B. Boersma,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flow over a permeable wall using a direct and a continuum approach , 2005 .

[34]  M. V. Zagarola,et al.  A new friction factor relationship for fully developed pipe flow , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[35]  Henry W. Schab PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER CONTAMINATED JET FUELS , 2009 .

[36]  Paul Roebber,et al.  Improving Snowfall Forecasting by Diagnosing Snow Density , 2003 .