Shift selection influence in partial cycle spinning denoising of biomedical signals

Abstract Denoising of biomedical signals using wavelet transform is a widely used technique. The use of undecimated wavelet transform (UWT) assures better denoising results but implies a higher complexity than discrete wavelet transform (DWT). Some implementation schemes have been proposed to perform UWT, one of them is Cycle Spinning (CS). CS is performed using the DWT of several circular shifted versions of the signal to analyse. The reduction of the number of shifted versions of the biomedical signal during denoising process used is addressed in the present work. This paper is about a variant of CS with a reduced number of shifts, called Partial Cycle Spinning (PCS), applied to ultrasonic trace denoising. The influence of the choice of PCS shifts in the denoised registers quality is studied. Several shifts selection rules are proposed, compared and evaluated. Denoising results over a set of ultrasonic registers are provided for PCS with different shift selection rules, CS and DWT. The work shows that PCS with the appropriate choice of shifts could be the best option to denoise biomedical ultrasonic traces.

[1]  Miguel A. Rodriguez-Hernandez,et al.  Noise reduction using wavelet cycle spinning: analysis of useful periodicities in the z-transform domain , 2016, Signal Image Video Process..

[2]  M. A. Rodriguez-Hernandez,et al.  Wavelet Cycle Spinning Denoising of NDE Ultrasonic Signals Using a Random Selection of Shifts , 2015 .

[3]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage , 1995 .

[4]  Emmanuelle Frenoux,et al.  A 1D wavelet filtering for ultrasound images despeckling , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[5]  G. Beylkin On the representation of operators in bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1992 .

[6]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Mark J. Shensa,et al.  The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a trous and Mallat algorithms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  M. A. Rodriguez-Hernandez,et al.  Wavelet denoising of ultrasonic A-scans for detection of weak signals , 2012, 2012 19th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP).

[9]  Wataru Ohyama,et al.  Speckle Reduction of Echocardiograms via Wavelet Shrinkage of Ultrasonic RF Signals , 2009 .

[10]  Fang Wang,et al.  Application of the dual-tree complex wavelet transform in biomedical signal denoising. , 2014, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[11]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[12]  E. Pardo,et al.  Shift Invariant Wavelet Denoising of Ultrasonic Traces , 2008 .

[13]  Yi Wang,et al.  An image despeckling approach using quantum-inspired statistics in dual-tree complex wavelet domain , 2015, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[14]  R. Coifman,et al.  Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms I , 1991 .

[15]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[16]  R.L. Galloway,et al.  A frequency diversity process for speckle reduction in real-time ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  J. C. Lázaro,et al.  Influence of thresholding procedures in ultrasonic grain noise reduction using wavelets. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[18]  Chen Wang,et al.  Wavelet and fast bilateral filter based de-speckling method for medical ultrasound images , 2015, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..