Artificial Intelligence Related Publication Analysis Based on Citation Counting

Artificial intelligence is one of the most popular technologies in recently years. Journals and conferences are widely viewed as major tools to track the development of technologies. Citation counting analysis is one of the most acknowledged metrics in spite of its controversial drawbacks. To the best of our knowledge, most methods based on citation counting do not taken into account the citation weight in different years. In this paper, we focused on citation counting and designed a scheme to calculate both the citation weight and weighting of the cited credits of different publications, which are used to verify the efficiency of the proposed scheme. We also evaluated the popularity of publications by calculating their popularity scores. Unlike other ranking regulations, our proposed measure was able to compare journals and conferences simultaneously. In addition, we extracted ranking results to calculate the pairwise similarity via a generalized measure, which provided a more objective insight into the differences between publications. Several interesting observations were found from the experimental results with real data.

[1]  Sushmita Ruj,et al.  A Graph Analytics Framework for Ranking Authors, Papers and Venues , 2017, ArXiv.

[2]  Hau-San Wong,et al.  Generalized Adjusted Rand Indices for cluster ensembles , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Re-examination of interestingness measures in pattern mining: a unified framework , 2010, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[4]  Saqib Iqbal,et al.  DS-Index: Ranking Authors Distinctively in an Academic Network , 2017, IEEE Access.

[5]  Michel Zitt,et al.  The journal impact factor: angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay’s article 2011 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[6]  Ying Ding,et al.  Weighted citation: An indicator of an article's prestige , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  L. Hubert,et al.  Comparing partitions , 1985 .

[8]  Tobias Wolbring,et al.  Matched control groups for modeling events in citation data: An illustration of nobel prize effects in citation networks , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The role of conference publications in CS , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Martin Davies,et al.  Geographies of influence: a citation network analysis of Higher Education 1972–2014 , 2017, Scientometrics.

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Ying Ding,et al.  Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Nan Jiang,et al.  Citation regression analysis of computer science publications in different ranking categories and subfields , 2017, Scientometrics.

[15]  Tanmoy Chakraborty,et al.  Role of interdisciplinarity in computer sciences: quantification, impact and life trajectory , 2017, Scientometrics.

[16]  Yin Leng Theng,et al.  Exploring prestigious citations sourced from top universities in bibliometrics and altmetrics: a case study in the computer science discipline , 2017, Scientometrics.

[17]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Dynamic credit allocation in scientific literature , 2017, Scientometrics.

[18]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data? , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks , 2010, KDD.

[20]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[21]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[22]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[23]  Feng Xia,et al.  Shifu: Deep Learning Based Advisor-advisee Relationship Mining in Scholarly Big Data , 2017, WWW.

[24]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators , 2016, Scientometrics.

[25]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[26]  Padraig Cunningham,et al.  Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science , 2010, Commun. ACM.