Sun Exposure Guidelines and Serum Vitamin D Status in Denmark: The StatusD Study

Little is known on how vitamin D status is affected by adherence to UVB-limiting sun exposure guidelines. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between adherence to the Danish sun exposure guidelines and vitamin D status. In total, 3194 Danes (2625 adults, 569 children) were recruited among the general population, and more than 92% had blood samples taken both autumn and spring. Using linear regression, we associated serum vitamin D concentrations to questionnaire responses on: seeking shade, wearing a sunhat, wearing protective clothing or using sunscreen. The odds ratio (OR) of either low (<25 or 50 nmol/L) or adequate/high (≥50 nmol/L) vitamin D status was examined using logistic regression. For adults, those who always sought shade or wore protective clothing compared to those who did not had lower levels of vitamin D (autumn concentrations for shade: 7.2 nmol/L lower (−11.0–−3.6 nmol/L); for protective clothing: 9.9 nmol/L lower (−13.6–−6.2 nmol/L). Adherence to all four guidelines was also associated with lower vitamin D concentrations (autumn: 9.7 nmol/L lower (−14.3–−5.1 nmol/L). Use of sunscreen was associated with adequate vitamin D status, as those who always sought shade compared to those who did not had an OR (95% CI) of 1.68 (1.25–2.35) of having ≥50 nmol/L during both spring and autumn. No associations were found with wearing a sunhat, and there were no clear associations for children. In conclusion, adherence to the sun exposure guidelines on shade and protective clothing was associated with lower vitamin D status among Danish adults, but not children.

[1]  A. Benomar,et al.  Vitamin D deficiency and its role in neurological conditions: A review. , 2016, Revue neurologique.

[2]  E. Jacobs,et al.  Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence , 2016, Journal of Cancer.

[3]  D. Papandreou,et al.  The Role of Vitamin D in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Review of the Literature , 2015, Disease markers.

[4]  S. Koskinen,et al.  Standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data from four Nordic population samples using the Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols: Shedding new light on vitamin D status in Nordic individuals , 2015, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[5]  A. Tjønneland,et al.  A Reverse J-Shaped Association Between Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: The CopD Study. , 2015, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[6]  K. H. Madsen,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of the effects of vitamin D–fortified milk and bread on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in families in Denmark during winter: the VitmaD study. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  A. Thorne-Lyman,et al.  Development and Validation of a Vitamin D Status Prediction Model in Danish Pregnant Women: A Study of the Danish National Birth Cohort , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  D. Viswanath,et al.  Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D , 2012, Pediatrics.

[9]  J. Christensen,et al.  A reverse J-shaped association of all-cause mortality with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in general practice: the CopD study. , 2012, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  P. Lips,et al.  The effect of vitamin D on bone and osteoporosis. , 2011, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[11]  C. Pedersen,et al.  The Danish Civil Registration System , 2011, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[12]  K. Glanz,et al.  Validity of Self-reported Solar UVR Exposure Compared with Objectively Measured UVR Exposure , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[13]  I. H. Clemmensen,et al.  Prevalence of sunburn and sun-related behaviour in the Danish population: A cross-sectional study , 2010, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[14]  H. Wulf,et al.  [UV index and its implications]. , 2010, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[15]  J. Zerwekh Blood biomarkers of vitamin D status. , 2008, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[16]  E. Thieden Sun exposure behaviour among subgroups of the Danish population. Based on personal electronic UVR dosimetry and corresponding exposure diaries. , 2008, Danish medical bulletin.

[17]  A. Tjønneland,et al.  Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in Diet, Cancer and Health: A population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark , 2007, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[18]  P. Autier,et al.  Sunscreen use and increased duration of intentional sun exposure: Still a burning issue , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[19]  K. Cashman Vitamin D in childhood and adolescence , 2007, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[20]  A. Webb,et al.  Calculated Ultraviolet Exposure Levels for a Healthy Vitamin D Status , 2006, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[21]  S. Oliveria,et al.  Sun exposure and risk of melanoma , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[22]  J. Verne,et al.  Preventing skin cancer , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  J. Olsen,et al.  Second malignant neoplasms after cancer in childhood or adolescence. Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. , 1993, BMJ.

[24]  M. Holick,et al.  Sunscreens suppress cutaneous vitamin D3 synthesis. , 1987, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[25]  T. Oppé,et al.  Vitamin D deficiency. , 1979, British medical journal.

[26]  Kristin L. Sainani,et al.  Sun protective behaviors and vitamin D levels in the US population: NHANES 2003–2006 , 2011, Cancer Causes & Control.

[27]  Keith C. Norris,et al.  Vitamin D and chronic kidney disease. , 2009, Ethnicity & disease.

[28]  Pär Stattin,et al.  Both high and low levels of blood vitamin D are associated with a higher prostate cancer risk: A longitudinal, nested case‐control study in the Nordic countries , 2004, International journal of cancer.