Lottery dependent utility

In this paper we propose a model for decision making under risk that is capable of predicting empirically observed preference patterns that have been found to be incompatible with the expected utility model. The model departs from the classical expected utility model by allowing utilities to depend on the lottery. The dependence of utilities on the lottery being evaluated is achieved by restricting the utility measure to a convenient parametric family of functions. The idea then is to use each lottery to determine a specific parameter value thus characterizing the utility function for each particular lottery. The expected value of this lottery dependent utility function provides the overall measure of preference. The model retains the properties of transitivity, stochastic dominance, and continuity. It also permits types of analyses, such as exploitation of basic attitudes toward risk through risk aversion properties, that have been found useful in decision theory. The primary use of our model is in descriptive or predictive research and applications. For some decision makers who wish to retain the preference patterns that are incompatible with the substitution principle, even after the implications of their choices are made transparent, our model could be of prescriptive use as well.

[1]  C. S. Hong,et al.  Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory , 1986 .

[2]  J. Becker A new model of decisions under risk using the concept of lottery dependent utility function , 1986 .

[3]  Louis Narens,et al.  Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type , 1985 .

[4]  David E. Bell,et al.  Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty , 1985, Oper. Res..

[5]  P. Fishburn Transitive measurable utility , 1983 .

[6]  M. Machina "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[7]  J. Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[8]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[9]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Decision Making: SOURCES OF BIAS IN ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS , 1982 .

[10]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  A Stronger Characterization of Declining Risk Aversion , 1982 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[12]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  M. Allais,et al.  The So-Called Allais Paradox and Rational Decisions under Uncertainty , 1979 .

[14]  M. Allais The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School (1952) , 1979 .

[15]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model , 1978 .

[16]  Jagdish Handa,et al.  Risk, Probabilities, and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Georges Bernard On utility functions , 1974 .

[18]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[19]  D G Morrison,et al.  On the consistency of preferences in Allais' paradox. , 1967, Behavioral science.

[20]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[21]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Pattern and level of risk in gambling decisions. , 1962, Psychological review.

[22]  J. Quirk,et al.  Admissibility and Measurable Utility Functions , 1962 .

[23]  K. Arrow Essays in the theory of risk-bearing , 1958 .

[24]  W. Edwards The prediction of decisions among bets. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[26]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[27]  J. Milnor,et al.  AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO MEASURABLE UTILITY , 1953 .

[28]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  M. G. Preston,et al.  An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[30]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.