High-dose irradiation for prostate cancer via a high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: results of a phase I to II study.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients on a prospective dose-escalation study of pelvic external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost. METHODS From November 1991 to April 2003, 197 patients were treated for intermediate- and high-risk disease features. All patients had prostate-specific antigen>10 ng/ml, Gleason score>or=7, or clinical stage>or=T2b, and all received pelvic EBRT (46 Gy) while receiving either two or three HDR boost treatments. HDR dose fractionation increased progressively and was divided into two dose levels. The mean prostate biologic equivalency dose was 88.2 Gy for the low-dose group and 116.8 Gy for the high-dose group (alpha/beta=1.2). Clinical failure was either local failure or distant metastasis; clinical event-free survival (cEFS) was defined as patients who lived free of clinical failure. RESULTS Median follow-up was 4.9 years. The 5-year rates were as follows: biologic failure (BF), 18.6%, clinical failure (CF), 9.8%, cEFS 84.8%, cause-specific survival (CSS), 98.3%, and overall survival (OS), 92.9%. Five-year biochemical failure (68.7% vs. 86%, p<0.001), CF (6.1% vs. 15.6%, p=0.04), cEFS (75.5% vs. 91.7%, p=0.003), CSS (95.4% vs. 100%, p=0.02), and OS (86.2% vs. 97.8%, p=0.002) were significantly better for the high-dose group. Multivariate analysis showed that high-dose group (p=0.01, HR 0.35) and Gleason score (p=0.01, HR 1.84) were significant variables for cEFS. Multivariate analysis showed that high-dose group (p=0.01, HR 0.14) and age (p=0.03, HR 1.09 per year) were significant variables for overall survival. CONCLUSION There is a strong dose-response relationship for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients. Improved locoregional control with higher radiation doses alone can significantly decrease biochemical and clinical failures.

[1]  Daniel W. Miller,et al.  Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[2]  D. Brenner,et al.  Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low α/β ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue , 2002 .

[3]  L. Schour,et al.  High-dose-rate intensity-modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: California endocurietherapy's 10-year results. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[5]  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005 .

[6]  A W Partin,et al.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. , 1999, JAMA.

[7]  G. Gustafson,et al.  Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  M. Piérart,et al.  Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  CLINICAL STUDIES , 2022 .

[10]  Chris Mitchell,et al.  Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer. , 2002, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[11]  C B Begg,et al.  The effect of local control on metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the prostate: long-term results in patients treated with 125I implantation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Qing Guo,et al.  Randomized trial comparing iridium implant plus external-beam radiation therapy with external-beam radiation therapy alone in node-negative locally advanced cancer of the prostate. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Biochemical Outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam Radiation Therapy, or interstitial Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer , 1998 .

[15]  L. Verhey,et al.  Advanced prostate cancer: the results of a randomized comparative trial of high dose irradiation boosting with conformal protons compared with conventional dose irradiation using photons alone. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  T. Mate,et al.  Long-term outcome by risk factors using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with or without neoadjuvant androgen suppression for localized prostate cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[18]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  James D. Cox,et al.  Consensus statement: Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy , 1997 .

[20]  J. Fowler,et al.  The radiobiology of prostate cancer including new aspects of fractionated radiotherapy , 2005, Acta oncologica.