Interaural Correlation Fails to Account for Detection in a Classic Binaural Task: Dynamic ITDs Dominate N0Sπ Detection

Binaural signal detection in an NoSπ task relies on interaural disparities introduced by adding an antiphasic signal to diotic noise. What metric of interaural disparity best predicts performance? Some models use interaural correlation; others differentiate between dynamic interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) of the effective stimulus. To examine the relative contributions of ITDs and ILDs in binaural detection, we developed a novel signal processing technique that selectively degrades different aspects (potential cues) of binaural stimuli (e.g., only ITDs are scrambled). Degrading a particular cue will affect performance only if that cue is relevant to the binaural processing underlying detection. This selective scrambling technique was applied to the stimuli of a classic N0Sπ task in which the listener had to detect an antiphasic 500-Hz signal in the presence of a diotic wideband noise masker. Data obtained from five listeners showed that (1) selective scrambling of ILDs had little effect on binaural detection, (2) selective scrambling of ITDs significantly degraded detection, and (3) combined scrambling of ILDs and ITDs had the same effect as exclusive scrambling of ITDs. Regarding the question which stimulus properties determine detection, we conclude that for this binaural task (1) dynamic ITDs dominate detection performance, (2) ILDs are largely irrelevant, and (3) interaural correlation of the stimulus is a poor predictor of detection. Two simple stimulus-based models that each reproduce all binaural aspects of the data quite well are described: (1) a single-parameter detection model using ITD variance as detection criterion and (2) a compressive transformation followed by a crosscorrelation analysis. The success of both of these contrasting models shows that our data alone cannot reveal the mechanisms underlying the dominance of ITD cues. The physiological implications of our findings are discussed.

[1]  V. Richards,et al.  The detectability of a tone added to narrow bands of equal-energy noise. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Matthew J Goupell,et al.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E. Osman,et al.  A Correlation Model of Binaural Masking Level Differences , 1971 .

[4]  D. H. Louage,et al.  Temporal properties of responses to broadband noise in the auditory nerve. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  L H Carney,et al.  Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  N. I. Durlach Note on Binaural Masking‐Level Differences at High Frequencies , 1964 .

[7]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Chapter 11 – MODELS OF BINAURAL INTERACTION , 1978 .

[8]  F. A. Webster,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase on Masked Thresholds I. The Role of Interaural Time‐Deviation , 1951 .

[9]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Masking with interaurally delayed stimuli: the use of "internal" delays in binaural detection. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Matthew J Goupell,et al.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  S. van de Par,et al.  The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H S Colburn,et al.  Analysis of binaural detection models for dependence on interaural target parameters. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H S Colburn,et al.  Interaural correlation sensitivity. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Binaural signal detection - Equalization and cancellation theory. , 1972 .

[15]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[16]  T. Yin,et al.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Blauert Lateralization of jittered tones. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Nigel P. Cooper,et al.  Compression in the Peripheral Auditory System , 2004 .

[20]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Binaural processing of modulated interaural level differences. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Masking of Tonal Signals , 1956 .

[22]  C Trahiotis,et al.  A consideration of the normalization that is typically included in correlation-based models of binaural detection. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Frederic L. Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differencesa) , 1978 .

[24]  Philip X Joris,et al.  Decorrelation Sensitivity of Auditory Nerve and Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Fibers to Broadband and Narrowband Noise , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Colin Cherry,et al.  On the Mechanism of Binaural Fusion , 1959 .

[26]  H S Colburn,et al.  Interaural correlation discrimination: i. bandwidth and level dependence. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  A temporal window for lateralization of interaural time difference by barn owls , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  P M Zurek,et al.  Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  P. Joris Interaural Time Sensitivity Dominated by Cochlea-Induced Envelope Patterns , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  B. Grothe,et al.  Psychophysical and Physiological Evidence for Fast Binaural Processing , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  C Trahiotis,et al.  A new way to account for binaural detection as a function of interaural noise correlation. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  S van de Par,et al.  Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  D E Robinson,et al.  Explanation of masking-level differences that result from interaural intensive disparities of noise. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  E R Hafter,et al.  Masking-level differences obtained with a pulsed tonal masker. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. I. General strategy and preliminary results on interaural discrimination. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Steven van de Par,et al.  The normalized correlation: Accounting for NoSπ thresholds with Gaussian and ‘‘low‐noise’’ masking noise , 1999 .

[38]  E de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. I. Frequency modulations ("glides") in impulse responses and cross-correlation functions. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  On the ability of neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to sense brief appearances of interaural time difference , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[41]  A Kohlrausch,et al.  The role of envelope fluctuations in spectral masking. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  S Buus,et al.  Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Andrew J. Byrne,et al.  Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .

[46]  Torsten Marquardt,et al.  Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of Interaural Phase and Level in Detection and Lateralization: 250 Hz , 1971 .

[48]  P M Zurek,et al.  Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Effect of Varying the Interaural Noise Correlation on the Detectability of Tonal Signals , 1963 .

[50]  A.R.D. Thornton,et al.  Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory , 1970 .

[51]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. II. Brief duration noises. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  Alberto Recio-Spinoso,et al.  Auditory Midbrain and Nerve Responses to Sinusoidal Variations in Interaural Correlation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Basilar Membrane Responses to Noise at a Basal Site of the Chinchilla Cochlea: Quasi-Linear Filtering , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[54]  T. Yin,et al.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. III. Comparison with afferent pathways. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  R. Fay,et al.  Compression: From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants , 2013, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[56]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Binaural detection as a function of interaural correlation and bandwidth of masking noise: implications for estimates of spectral resolution. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  E. de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.