A Model-Based Investigation of Learner Attitude towards Recently Introduced Classroom Technology

Introduction Recent technological advancements have provided educators and learners with new tools to support in-class instruction and coursework. Hence integrating technology into classrooms is a growing initiative that is becoming an important and growing part of educational culture and university life (Bratina, Hayes, & Blumsack, 2002; Wiley 21). For instance, California's educational budget provided a total of $433 million in 2003 to increase the use of technology in schools and universities. In 2008 the United States provided $273 million funding to secondary and high schools to support the deployment and integration of educational technology into classroom instruction. Classroom Technology is the collection of software, hardware and, processes that facilitate learning (and teaching) and thus impact (mostly positively) the learner's attitude and performance (Govindasamy 2002; Khan 2000). Similarly, learner attitude is defined as the impact or influence of classroom technology on a student's disposition towards learning and this can be positive, negative, or neutral (meaning no change). From September 2007 to September 2008, a University in Qatar (a country in the Middle East Gulf region) was fitted with classroom technology with the prime aim of creating an interactive and conducive learning environment. Within this context the issues that were considered pertinent in initial post-implementation stage, as far as learner attitude was concerned, were: --experience with basic Information and Communications Technologies ICTs) and their effect on learner (Liaw, Huang, & Chen, 2007). --broadening of classroom technology initiated communications channels and its impact on learning and absorbing abilities of students (Urden & Weggen, 2000). --level of learning independence created through use of classroom technologies (Cuban, 1993). --level of difficulty related to both the operational (know how to use) and situational (in working order) aspects of classroom technologies (Bannan-Ritland, Dabbagh, & Murphy, 2000; Singh, 2000). Consequently the prime focus of this study is on the introduction of an assortment of classroom technologies (i.e., a combination of audio-visual equipment and online systems) within a university (i.e., higher education) and their impact on the learners' attitude. According to a number of academics in the educational technologies field, through the implementation of educational technology student attitude tends to improve, and the students are also better prepared to enter and succeed in the digital workplace (Chen, Lee, & Chen, 2005; Liaw, 2004). Similarly, many collaborative learning theories argue that human interaction is a vital ingredient to learning and classroom technologies tend to increase the bandwidth of face-to-face (especially written and gestural) communication avenues, which creates an exchange environment where information is shared and enriched through application of classroom technologies (Bharati, 2003; Liaw & Huang, 2003). These views raise a number of questions; namely, Do classroom technologies create a platform for enhanced communications? Do classroom technologies provide new channels for information acquisition and exchange? Do classroom technologies help learner with self-directed learning by accessing relevant materials on their own? With these questions in mind and forming the research objective, the investigation examined the impact of classroom technology (which included a combination of laptop, overhead projector, document camera, DVD player, speakers, video-conferencing facility, and in-class wireless internet access) on learner attitude. As exploratory research, two focus groups (one for male and one for female students) were conducted to identify the key variables of classroom technology-related learner attitude (see Table 1). The university student population is segregated into males and females. …

[1]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Considerations for Developing Constructivist Web-Based Learning , 2004 .

[2]  Ann E. Barron,et al.  New Technologies for Education: A Beginner's Guide , 1994 .

[3]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[5]  Hahn-Ming Lee,et al.  Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  David A. Wiley Peer-to-peer and learning objects: the new potential for collaborative constructivist learning online , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[8]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The design of powerful learning environments. , 2006 .

[9]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Diane J. Hanson,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Gwo-Dong Chen,et al.  Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Thavamalar Govindasamy,et al.  Successful implementation of e-Learning: Pedagogical considerations , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[15]  Christopher R. Wolfe,et al.  Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[16]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Students’ perspectives on learning environments , 2004 .

[17]  Kim Buch,et al.  Learning style and training delivery mode preference , 2002 .

[18]  E. Corte Towards powerful learning environments for the acquisition of problem-solving skills , 1990 .

[19]  Katia Passerini,et al.  A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet , 2000 .

[20]  R. Ocker,et al.  Collaborative Learning Environments: Exploring Student Attitudes and Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Asynchronous Computer Conferencing Settings , 2001 .

[21]  A. Milne,et al.  Once a Week , 1914 .

[22]  Tuiren A. Bratina,et al.  Preparing Teachers To Use Learning Objects , 2002 .

[23]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? , 2007, Medical teacher.

[24]  Badrul H. Khan,et al.  A framework for web-based learning , 2000 .

[25]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version , 2000 .

[26]  Pratyush Bharati,et al.  People and Information Matter: Task Support Satisfaction from the other Side , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Computers Meet Classroom: Classroom Wins , 1993, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[28]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[29]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Nasar Manochehri,et al.  The Impact of Student Learning Styles with Web-Based Learning or Instructor-Based Learning on Student Knowledge and Satisfaction , 2006 .

[31]  Kathleen Burnett,et al.  User acceptance of web-based subscription databases: extending the technology acceptance model , 2005 .

[32]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[33]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[34]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[35]  L. English,et al.  Dimensions of Spirituality: A Framework for Adult Educators , 2004 .

[36]  Yehia Mortagy,et al.  The Effect of Student Background in E-Learning — Longitudinal Study , 2008 .

[37]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[38]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Assessing the Factors Deemed to Support Individual Student Intrinsic Motivation in Technology Supported Online and Face-to-Face Discussions , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[39]  T. Urdan,et al.  Corporate elearning: exploring a new frontier , 2000 .

[40]  Peter C. Honebein,et al.  Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning , 1993 .

[41]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..