Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations

Hybrid organizations combine institutional logics in their efforts to generate innovative solutions to complex problems. They face unintended consequences of that institutional complexity, however, which may impede their efforts. Past scholars have emphasized conflicting external demands, and competing internal claims on organizational identity. Data from an in-depth field study of the public-private Cambridge Energy Alliance suggest another consequence: paradoxes of performing (Smith & Lewis, 2011) that generate ambiguity about whether certain organizational outcomes represent success or failure. This article develops a process model of navigating such paradoxes: in sensemaking about paradoxical outcomes, actors grapple with definition of success and can transform the organizational logic. The result can be oscillation among logics, or novel synthesis between them when outside perspectives enable a clearer view of the paradox. Hybrid organizations' capacity for innovation depends in part on the results of this change process.

[1]  Sarah Kaplan.  Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Tammar B. Zilber,et al.  INSTITUTIONALIZATION AS AN INTERPLAY BETWEEN ACTIONS, MEANINGS, AND ACTORS: THE CASE OF A RAPE CRISIS CENTER IN ISRAEL , 2002 .

[3]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and Institutional Theory , 1997 .

[4]  Olaf G. Rughase.  What is Organizational Identity , 2006 .

[5]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[6]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[7]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Fiona E. Murray.  The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  A. Vásquez.  Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation , 1959, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Marilyn A Brown.  Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies , 2001 .

[12]  J. Bryson,et al.  The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature , 2006 .

[13]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Three Fragments From a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials , 1987 .

[14]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[15]  David Stark,et al.  The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life , 2009 .

[16]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[17]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[18]  M. Glynn.  When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra , 2000 .

[19]  T. Reay,et al.  Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics , 2009 .

[20]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[21]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  P. Senge.  The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World , 2008 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[25]  Julia Balogun,et al.  Three Responses to the Methodological Challenges of Studying Strategizing , 2003 .

[26]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[27]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[28]  TsoukasHaridimos,et al.  On Organizational Becoming , 2002 .

[29]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[30]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[31]  S. Waddock,et al.  Catalytic Alliances for Social Problem Solving , 1995 .

[32]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands , 2010 .

[34]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Clinical Inquiry/Research , 2008 .

[35]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[36]  E. Hamilton-Smith,et al.  Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-Based Management and the Environment , 2008 .

[37]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[38]  K. Cooney.  The Institutional and Technical Structuring of Nonprofit Ventures: Case Study of a U.S. Hybrid Organization Caught Between Two Fields , 2006 .

[39]  Clark G. Gilbert,et al.  Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  THE SELECTIVE SYNTHESIS OF COMPETING LOGICS. , 2006 .

[41]  Steve Waddell.  Societal Learning and Change: How Governments, Business and Civil Society are Creating Solutions to Complex Multi-Stakeholder Problems , 2005 .

[42]  M. Pratt,et al.  Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities , 2000 .

[43]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  The Intraorganizational Power Struggle: Rise of Finance Personnel to Top Leadership in Large Corporations, 1919-1979 , 1987 .

[44]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[45]  T. Cain.  The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice , 2014 .

[46]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[47]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[48]  J. Balogun,et al.  Organizational Restructuring and Middle Manager Sensemaking , 2004 .

[49]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[50]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[52]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[54]  M. Lounsbury.  A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation In the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds , 2007 .

[55]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[56]  Scienze Politiche.  American Community Survey , 2011 .

[57]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[58]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[59]  Klaus Weber,et al.  Making Sense with Institutions: Context, Thought and Action in Karl Weick’s Theory , 2006 .

[60]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[61]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses , 2010 .

[62]  W. Scott.  Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences , 2003 .

[63]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies , 2008 .

[64]  Tammy E. Beck,et al.  RADICAL CHANGE ACCIDENTALLY: THE EMERGENCE AND AMPLIFICATION OF SMALL CHANGE , 2007 .

[65]  Kenwyn K. Smith,et al.  Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. , 1987 .

[66]  Rodrigo Canales.  From Ideals to Institutions: Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mexican Small Business Finance , 2011 .

[67]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .