Chapter 21 Reverse algebra

Publisher Summary In this chapter, Reverse algebra is discussed in detail. Reverse algebra is part of a program called “reverse mathematics” whose goal is to answer the main question: “Which set existence axioms are needed in order to prove the theorems of countable algebra?” The set existence axioms are formulated in the context of weak subsystems of the second-order arithmetic. Almost all countable algebra can be developed within the formal system Z 2 of second-order arithmetic. Investigations revealed that the set existence axioms of Z 2 are in fact, too strong. If a theorem of countable algebra is proved from the weakest possible set existence axioms, it will be possible to “reverse” the algebraic theorem by proving that it is equivalent to those axioms over a weaker base theory. The chapter provides examples of how some theorems of countable algebra can be developed in weak subsystems of Z­ 2 , and how to “reverse” them. How the reverse algebra is related to recursive algebra has been discussed. The similarities and differences between reverse algebra and recursive algebra is illustrated by an example.

[1]  Harvey M. Friedman,et al.  Higher set theory and mathematical practice , 1971 .

[2]  J. Ersov Theorie der Numerierungen II , 1973 .

[3]  M. Rabin Computable algebra, general theory and theory of computable fields. , 1960 .

[4]  A. Nerode,et al.  Effective content of field theory , 1979 .

[5]  P. Bernays,et al.  Grundlagen der Mathematik , 1934 .

[6]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Addendum to "countable algebra and set existence axioms" , 1985, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[7]  Richard Kaye Models of Peano arithmetic , 1991, Oxford logic guides.

[8]  Joseph R. Shoenfield,et al.  Mathematical logic , 1967 .

[9]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Countable Valued Fields in Weak Subsystems of Second-Order Arithmetic , 1989, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[10]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Countable algebra and set existence axioms , 1983, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[11]  Kostas Hatzikiriakou Algebraic disguises ofΣ10 induction , 1989, Arch. Math. Log..

[12]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Subsystems of second order arithmetic , 1999, Perspectives in mathematical logic.

[13]  Ju. L. Ers Theorie Der Numerierungen III , 1977, Math. Log. Q..

[14]  R. Soare,et al.  Π⁰₁ classes and degrees of theories , 1972 .

[15]  Kostas Hatzikiriakou WKL0 and Stone's Separation Theorem for Convex Sets , 1996, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[16]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Factorization of polynomials and Σ10 induction , 1986, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[17]  Kostas Hatzikiriakou,et al.  Minimal prime ideals and arithmetic comprehension , 1991, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[18]  J. Shepherdson,et al.  Effective procedures in field theory , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Which set existence axioms are needed to prove the Cauchy/Peano theorem for ordinary differential equations? , 1984, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[20]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Degrees of Unsolvability: A Survey of Results , 1977 .

[21]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Ordinal numbers and the Hilbert basis theorem , 1988, Journal of Symbolic Logic.